Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: Mortality in surgical neonates contributes to neonatal mortality rates. The study was conceptualized to study clinical and nonclinical factors affecting mortality in surgical neonates so that timely intervention could result in improved survival of the neonates. Materials and Methods: The study was initiated after approval from the institutional ethics committee and included 120 surgical neonates over a period of 18 months after obtaining consent from the parents/caregivers. Predesigned pro forma was used to record the details of antenatal care received, place of birth, travel history, maternal education and gestational age, and clinical condition at the time of admission. Values of biochemical tests such as serum electrolytes, serum creatinine, and arterial blood gasses were recorded. The need of inotrope support, blood or blood product transfusion, and postoperative ventilator support and intensive care unit (ICU) care was recorded. The results of the two groups, i.e., survivals and mortality, were compared. Outcome was recorded as mortality at 30 days or earlier. Results: Irrespective of the surgical condition, the survival rate was significantly better in those babies who weighed more than 2.5 kg at the time of admission, had capillary refill time of <3 s, had serum ionized calcium levels more than 1 mmol/L, and did not require inotropes, blood or blood product transfusion, and postoperative ICU care and ventilator support. The place of birth, educational status of the mother, gestational age, and distance traveled for care had no statistically significant effect on survival. Conclusion: There is a statistically significant correlation between the survival of the babies who weighed more than 2.5 kg and are more physiologically preserved at the time of admission. Mortality rates can be decreased by timely interventions to reduce the need of inotropes, blood or blood products, and ICU care and ventilator support during their postoperative recovery.

Background: Neonatal sepsis-related mortalities are the outcome of a complex interaction of maternal-foetal colonisation, transplacental immunity and physical and cellular defence mechanisms of neonates. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk factors of mortality in outborn neonatal sepsis. Materials and Methods: A 1-year prospective observational study was undertaken at a tertiary care centre. All referred neonates with maternal and neonatal risk factors of sepsis were enrolled. Blood culture, sepsis screen and other relevant investigations were performed. Results: The mortality rate of neonatal sepsis among outborns was 38.24%. The common presentations of these neonates were respiratory distress, lethargy and hypothermia. On univariate analysis, significant risk factors for mortality included male sex (P = 0.05), weight on admission <1500 g (P < 0.001), hypothermia (P = 0.003), respiratory distress (P = 0.04), cyanosis (P = 0.001), convulsions (P = 0.02), prolonged capillary refill time (P < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001), abnormal radiological finding (P = 0.01), cerebrospinal fluid cellularity (P = 0.002) and positive C-reactive protein (P < 0.001). Maternal factors such as hypertension in pregnancy (P = 0.001) and antepartum haemorrhage (P = 0.03) were associated with statistically significant mortality. Gestational age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.49, confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.90, P = 0.02), weight on admission (OR: 1.57, CI: 1.08-2.27, P = 0.01), age at admission (OR: 0.89, CI: 0.78-0.99, P = 0.04), distance travelled with neonate (OR: 1.01, CI: 1.00-1.01, P = 0.003), duration of hospital stay (OR: 0.69, CI: 0.63-0.74, P < 0.001), hypothermia (OR: 1.87, CI: 1.01-3.42, P = 0.04), convulsion (OR: 2.88, CI: 1.33-6.20, P = 0.007), cyanosis (OR: 2.39, CI: 1.07-5.35, P = 0.03) and prolonged capillary refill time (OR: 3.34, CI: 1.78-6.24, P < 0.001) were the independent predictors of mortality in neonatal sepsis. Conclusion: Gestational age; birth weight; long distance travelled with neonate and presentation with hypothermia, cyanosis, convulsions and prolonged capillary refill time were the independent risk factors for mortality in neonatal sepsis among outborns.

Background & objectives: Data on neonatal COVID-19 are limited to the immediate postnatal period, with a primary focus on vertical transmission in inborn infants. This study was aimed to assess the characteristics and outcome of COVID-19 in outborn neonates. Methods: All neonates admitted to the paediatric emergency from August 1 to December 31, 2020, were included in the study. SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription- (RT)-PCR test was done on oro/nasopharyngeal specimens obtained at admission. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative neonates were compared and the diagnostic accuracy of a selective testing policy was assessed. Results: A total of 1225 neonates were admitted during the study period, of whom SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was performed in 969. The RT-PCR test was positive in 17 (1.8%). Mean (standard deviation) gestation and birth weight of SARS-CoV-2-infected neonates were 35.5 (3.2) wk and 2274 (695) g, respectively. Most neonates (11/17) with confirmed COVID-19 reported in the first two weeks of life. Respiratory distress (14/17) was the predominant manifestation. Five (5/17, 29.4%) SARS-CoV-2 infected neonates died. Neonates with COVID-19 were at a higher risk for all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR): 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-8.9, P=0.03]; however, mortality did not differ after adjusting for lethal malformation (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 0.7-8.7). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratios (95% CI) of selective testing policy for SARS-CoV-2 infection at admission was 52.9 (28.5-76.1), 83.3 (80.7-85.6), 82.8 (80.3-85.1), 3.17 (1.98-5.07), and 0.56 (0.34-0.93) per cent, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate among the outborn neonates reporting to the paediatric emergency and tested for COVID-19 was observed to be low. The selective testing policy had poor diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing COVID-19 from non-COVID illness.

This study aimed to evaluate the association of neonatal transfer with the risk of neurodevelopmental outcomes at 3 years of age. Data were obtained from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. A general population of 103,060 pregnancies with 104,062 fetuses was enrolled in the study in 15 Regional Centers between January 2011 and March 2014. Live-born singletons at various gestational ages, including term infants, without congenital anomalies who were followed up until 3 years were included. Neurodevelopmental impairment was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, third edition (ASQ-3) at 3 years of age. Logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted risk and 95% confidence interval (CI) for newborns with neonatal transfer. Socioeconomic and perinatal factors were included as potential confounders in the analysis. Among 83,855 live-born singletons without congenital anomalies, 65,710 children were studied. Among them, 2780 (4.2%) were transferred in the neonatal period. After adjustment for potential confounders, the incidence of neurodevelopmental impairment (scores below the cut-off value of all 5 domains in the ASQ-3) was higher in children with neonatal transfer compared with those without neonatal transfer (communication: 6.5% vs 3.5%, OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.19–1.70; gross motor: 7.6% vs 4.0%, OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07–1.49; fine motor: 11.3% vs 7.1%, OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03–1.36; problem solving: 10.8% vs 6.8%, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12–1.48; and personal-social: 6.2% vs 2.9%, OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26–1.83).    Conclusion : Neonatal transfer was associated with a higher risk of neurodevelopmental impairment at 3 years of age. What is Known: •  Neonatal transfer after birth in preterm infants is associated with adverse short-term outcomes. • Long-term outcomes of outborn infants with neonatal transfer in the general population remain unclear. What is New: •  This study suggests that neonatal transfer at birth is associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairment. •  Efforts for referring high-risk pregnant women to higher level centers may reduce the incidence of neonatal transfer, leading to improved neurological outcomes in the general population.

The frequency of non-invasive respiratory support use has increased in neonates of all gestational ages with respiratory distress (RD). However, the impact of delayed initiation of non-invasive respiratory support in outborn neonates remains poorly understood. This study aimed to identify the impact of the delayed initiation of non-invasive respiratory support in outborn, late-preterm, and term neonates. Medical records of 277 infants (gestational age of ≥ 35 weeks) who received non-invasive respiratory support as primary respiratory therapy < 24 h of age between 2016 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Factors associated with respiratory adverse outcomes were investigated in 190 outborn neonates. Infants with RD were divided into two groups: mild (fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO 2 ] ≤ 0.3) and moderate-to-severe RD (FiO 2  > 0.3), depending on their initial oxygen requirements from non-invasive respiratory support. The median time for the initiation of non-invasive respiratory support at a tertiary center was 3.5 (2.2–5.0) h. Male sex, a high oxygen requirement (FiO 2  > 0.3), high CO 2 level, and respiratory distress syndrome were significant factors associated with adverse outcomes. Subgroup analysis revealed that in the moderate-to-severe RD group, delayed commencement of non-invasive respiratory support (≥ 3 h) was significantly associated with pulmonary air leakage ( p  = 0.033). Conclusion : Our study shows that outborn neonates with moderate-to-severe RD, who were treated with delayed non-invasive respiratory support, were associated with an increased likelihood of pulmonary air leakage. Additional prospective studies are required to establish the optimal timing and methods of non-invasive respiratory support for outborn, late-preterm, and term infants. What is Known: • Non-invasive respiratory support is widely used in neonates of all gestational ages. • Little is known on the impact of delayed initiation of non-invasive respiratory support in outborn, late preterm, and term neonates. What is New: • Male sex, high oxygen requirement (FiO2 >0.3), high initial CO2 level, and respiratory distress syndrome significantly correlated with adverse outcomes. • Outborn late-preterm and term neonates with high oxygen requirement who were treated with delayed non-invasive respiratory support indicated an increased likelihood of pulmonary air leakage.