Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background:This double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, phase-3 study was designed to test the noninferiority of paliperidone palmitate 3-month formulation (PP3M) to the currently marketed 1-month formulation (PP1M) in patients (age 18–70 years) with schizophrenia, previously stabilized on PP1M.Methods:After screening (≤3 weeks) and a 17-week, flexible-dosed, open-label phase (PP1M: day 1 [150mg eq. deltoid], day 8 [100mg eq. deltoid.], weeks 5, 9, and 13 [50, 75, 100, or 150mg eq., deltoid/gluteal]), clinically stable patients were randomized (1:1) to PP3M (fixed-dose, 175, 263, 350, or 525mg eq. deltoid/gluteal) or PP1M (fixed-dose, 50, 75, 100, or 150mg eq. deltoid/gluteal) for a 48-week double-blind phase.Results:Overall, 1016/1429 open-label patients entered the double-blind phase (PP3M: n=504; PP1M: n=512) and 842 completed it (including patients with relapse). PP3M was noninferior to PP1M: relapse rates were similar in both groups (PP3M: n=37, 8%; PP1M: n=45, 9%; difference in relapse-free rate: 1.2% [95% CI:-2.7%; 5.1%]) based on Kaplan-Meier estimates (primary efficacy). Secondary endpoint results (changes from double-blind baseline in positive and negative symptom score total and subscale scores, Clinical Global Impression-Severity, and Personal and Social Performance scores) were consistent with primary endpoint results. No clinically relevant differences were observed in pharmacokinetic exposures between PP3M and PP1M. Both groups had similar tolerability profiles; increased weight was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (double-blind phase; 21% each). No new safety signals were detected.Conclusion:Taken together, PP3M with its 3-month dosing interval is a unique option for relapse prevention in schizophrenia.

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the investigational long-acting injectable antipsychotic agent paliperidone palmitate (PP) in the treatment of schizophrenia. Patients were randomized to receive gluteal injections of placebo or PP (50 or 100 mg eq., fixed doses), without oral supplementation, on days 1, 8, and 36 (9-wk, double-blind phase) in this phase 2b study. Patients (n=197, intent-to-treat analysis set) were 62% men, mean (s.d.) age 39 (10) yr, with a baseline mean (s.d.) Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 87.0 (12.5). Mean (s.d.) PANSS total scores showed significant improvement at endpoint (primary measure) for both the PP 50 mg eq. [−5.2 (21.5)] and PP 100 mg eq. [−7.8 (19.4)] groups, vs. placebo [6.2 (18.3)] (p⩽0.001, each dose vs. placebo). This improvement was detected by day 8 and maintained to endpoint (p⩽0.011) for both doses. In the safety analysis set (n=247), fewer PP-treated patients (2%) discontinued for treatment-emergent adverse events vs. placebo-treated (10%). Rates of treatment-emergent extrapyramidal syndrome-related adverse events were comparable between active treatment and placebo, with the exception of parkinsonism-related disorders (50 mg eq. 5%, 100 mg eq. 8%, placebo 1%). Results of other safety measures suggest PP to be generally well-tolerated. Throughout the study, investigators rated injection-site pain as absent (56–71%), mild (24–39%), moderate (2–12%), or severe (0–2%). PP (50 and 100 mg eq. doses) administered as a gluteal intramuscular injection was efficacious and generally tolerated in these patients with acute symptomatic schizophrenia.

Background and Objectives The genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 is characterized by an excessive impact on positive and adverse drug reactions to antipsychotics, such as risperidone. Consequently, the pharmacokinetics of the drug and metabolite can be substantially altered and exhibit a high variability between the different phenotypes. The goal of this study was to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model considering the CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism for risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone (9-OH-RIS) taking CYP3A4 into account. Additionally, risperidone dose adjustments, which would compensate for genetically caused differences in the plasma concentrations of the active moiety (sum of risperidone and 9-OH-RIS) were calculated. Methods Based on available knowledge about risperidone, 9-OH-RIS, and relevant physiological changes according to different CYP2D6 phenotypes, several PBPK models were built. In addition, an initial model was further evaluated based on the plasma concentrations of risperidone and 9-OH-RIS from a single-dose study including 71 genotyped healthy volunteers treated with 1 mg of oral risperidone. Results PBPK models were able to accurately describe risperidone exposure after single-dose administration, especially in the concentration range ≥ 1 µg/L, illustrated by a minimal bias and a good precision. About 90.3% of all weighted residuals versus observed plasma concentrations ≥ 1 µg/L were in the ± 30% range. The risperidone/9-OH-RIS ratio increased progressively according to reduced CYP2D6 activity, resulting in a mean ratio of 4.96 for poor metabolizers. Simulations demonstrate that dose adjustment of the drug by − 25% for poor metabolizers and by – 10% for intermediate metabolizers results in a similar exposure to that of extensive metabolizers. Conversely, the risperidone/9-OH-RIS ratio can be used to determine the phenotype of individuals. Conclusion PBPK modelling can provide a valuable tool to predict the pharmacokinetics of risperidone and 9-OH-RIS in healthy volunteers, according to the different CYP2D6 phenotypes taking CYP3A4 into account. These models are able to ultimately support decision-making regarding dose-optimization strategies, especially for subjects showing lower CYP2D6 activity.

BackgroundThis analysis evaluated potential differences in subjective well-being (SW) among patients with early-phase schizophrenia (SZ) randomized to treatment with either long-acting injectable (LAI) or oral aripiprazole or paliperidone within the “European Long-acting Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Trial” (EULAST).MethodsA total of 478 patients were followed for up to 19 months. SW was measured using the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic Treatment scale (SWN). Linear mixed-effects models assessed treatment differences. Comprehensive analyses included age, sex, symptomatology (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS]), and side effects (Systematic Monitoring of Adverse Events Related to Treatments [SMARTS] and St. Hans rating scale [SHRS] for extrapyramidal syndromes) on SWN changes.ResultsOverall, SW improved over the course of the study. No significant differences emerged between LAI and oral administration (p = 0.1533) or between aripiprazole and paliperidone (p = 0.2008). Similarly, age and sex were not relevant in this regard. In contrast, negative, positive, and affective symptoms (all p < 0.0001) as well as the overall side effect burden (SMARTS sum-score, p < 0.0001) showed significant inverse associations with SW. Certain SHRS subscales correlated with SW in partial models, but associations disappeared in the fully adjusted model.ConclusionsPatients with SZ initiating LAI or oral treatment with aripiprazole or paliperidone reported comparable SW improvements. Findings emphasize that treatment choice should be guided less by formulation or substance and more by individual patient needs, prioritizing symptom control while minimizing adverse effects. A patient-centered approach remains essential to optimize both clinical outcomes and subjective well-being in early-phase SZ.

Abstract Background This double-blind (DB), randomized, parallel-group study was designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) formulation relative to paliperidone palmitate 3-month (PP3M) formulation in patients with schizophrenia. Methods Following screening, patients entered an open-label (OL) maintenance phase and received 1 injection cycle of paliperidone palmitate 1-month (PP1M; 100 or 150 mg eq.) or PP3M (350 or 525 mg eq.). Clinically stable patients were randomized (2:1) to receive PP6M (700 or 1000 mg eq., gluteal injections) or PP3M (350 or 525 mg eq.) in a 12-month DB phase; 2 doses of PP6M (corresponding to doses of PP1M and PP3M) were chosen. Results Overall, 1036 patients were screened, 838 entered the OL phase, and 702 (mean age: 40.8 years) were randomized (PP6M: 478; PP3M: 224); 618 (88.0%) patients completed the DB phase (PP6M: 416 [87.0%]; PP3M: 202 [90.2%]). Relapse rates were PP6M, 7.5% (n = 36) and PP3M, 4.9% (n = 11). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the difference (95% CI) between treatment groups (PP6M − PP3M) in the percentages of patients who remained relapse free was −2.9% (−6.8%, 1.1%), thus meeting noninferiority criteria (95% CI lower bound is larger than the pre-specified noninferiority margin of −10%). Secondary efficacy endpoints corroborated the primary analysis. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between PP6M (62.1%) and PP3M (58.5%). No new safety concerns emerged. Conclusions The efficacy of a twice-yearly dosing regimen of PP6M was noninferior to that of PP3M in preventing relapse in patients with schizophrenia adequately treated with PP1M or PP3M. Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT03345342

Abstract Background The 3 paliperidone palmitate (PP) long-acting injectable antipsychotic formulations, PP 1-month (PP1M), PP 3-month (PP3M), and PP 6-month (PP6M), have shown to reduce the risk of relapse in schizophrenia. The current phase-4 study constructed external comparator arms (ECAs) using real-world data for PP3M and PP1M and compared relapse prevention rates with PP6M from an open-label extension (OLE) study in adult patients with schizophrenia. Methods PP6M data were derived from a single-arm, 24-month, OLE study (NCT04072575), which included patients with schizophrenia who completed a 12-month randomized, double-blind, noninferiority, phase-3 study (NCT03345342) without relapse. Patients in the PP3M and PP1M ECAs were identified from the IBM® MarketScan® Multistate Medicaid Database based on similar eligibility criteria as the PP6M cohort. Results A total of 178 patients were included in each cohort following propensity score matching. Most patients were men (>70%; mean age: 39–41 years). Time to relapse (primary analysis based on Kaplan-Meier estimates) was significantly delayed in the PP6M cohort (P < .001, log-rank test). The relapse rate was lower in the PP6M cohort (3.9%) vs PP3M (20.2%) and PP1M (29.8%) cohorts. Risk of relapse decreased significantly (P < .001) by 82% for PP6M vs PP3M (HR = 0.18 [95% CI = 0.08 to 0.40]), 89% for PP6M vs PP1M (HR = 0.11 [0.05 to 0.25]), and 35% for PP3M vs PP1M (HR = 0.65 [0.42 to 0.99]; P = .043). Sensitivity analysis confirmed findings from the primary analysis. Although the ECAs were matched to mimic the characteristics of the PP6M cohort, heterogeneity between the groups could exist due to factors including prior study participation, unmeasured confounders, variations in data capture and quality, and completeness of clinical information. Conclusions In a clinical trial setting, PP6M significantly delayed time to relapse and demonstrated lower relapse rates compared with PP3M and PP1M treatments in real-world settings among adult patients with schizophrenia. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04072575; EudraCT number: 2018-004532-30

A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, noninferiority trial (NCT03345342) demonstrated that paliperidone palmitate once-every-6-months (PP6M) was noninferior to paliperidone palmitate once-every-3-months (PP3M) in preventing relapse in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety following transition to PP6M from paliperidone once-monthly (PP1M) versus PP3M. Adults with schizophrenia who were clinically stable on moderate/high doses of PP1M or PP3M were randomly assigned 1:2 to dorsogluteal PP3M or PP6M treatment for 12 months. The primary efficacy measure was time to relapse during the 12-month DB phase. Secondary endpoints included change from DB baseline to endpoint in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale scores, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale score, and Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale score. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests. Of 702 patients in the study, 231 transitioned from PP1M to PP6M and 247 transitioned from PP3M to PP6M. Low relapse rates for PP6M were observed regardless of transition pathway (PP1M/PP6M: 7.8%; PP3M/PP6M: 7.3%). Changes from DB baseline to endpoint in PANSS total, PSP, and CGI-S scores were similar between transition groups. In the DB phase, ≥1 TEAE was observed in 61.0% and 63.2% of patients in the PP1M/PP6M and PP3M/PP6M, groups, respectively. Adults with schizophrenia who transitioned to PP6M from either PP1M or PP3M experienced similarly low relapse rates. Additionally, symptom and functionality scores supported the primary analysis and, along with TEAE incidences, were comparable between transition groups.

Background and Objective A model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach was implemented for paliperidone palmitate (PP) 6-month (PP6M) clinical development, using pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based simulations. Methods PP6M pharmacokinetics were simulated by extending the PP 3-month (PP3M) pharmacokinetic model to account for increased injection volume, and hence dose. Contribution of the MIDD approach to the design of the pivotal PP6M phase-3 study (PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study, NCT03345342) investigating schizophrenia relapse rates was twofold: (1) PP6M dose selection, and (2) hypothesis generation that lower trough concentrations ( C trough ) associated with PP6M, relative to PP3M, were not associated with lower efficacy, which was to be evaluated in the phase-3 study. Moreover, accompanied by an intense sampling scheme to adequately characterize paliperidone pharmacokinetics and to elucidate the potential relationship between concentration and safety/efficacy, the bridging strategy eliminated the need for additional phase-1/phase-2 clinical studies. Results Using a MIDD bridging strategy, PP6M doses were selected that, compared with PP3M, were expected to have a similar range of exposures and a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile. Clinical data from PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study confirmed that PP6M, compared with PP3M, had a similar range of exposures (T’jollyn et al. in Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2024), as well as a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile (this manuscript). Conclusions Consistency of the MIDD approach with observed clinical outcomes confirmed the hypothesis that lower C trough did not lead to increased relapse rates at the doses administered. Although higher paliperidone peak concentrations are achieved with corresponding doses of PP6M relative to PP3M in the phase-3 clinical study, types and incidences of treatment-related adverse events were comparable between PP6M and PP3M groups and no new safety concerns emerged for PP6M (Najarian et al. in Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 25(3):238–251, 2022).

Paliperidone palmitate (PP) is a recently (USA) approved injectable new-generation antipsychotic. This 53-wk, Phase-III double-blind study was designed to assess the non-inferiority of PP to risperidone long-acting injectable (RIS-LAI) in schizophrenia treatment. Acutely symptomatic patients (n=749), with a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score between 60 and 120 were randomly allocated to gluteal injections of either (a) PP: 50 mg eq. on days 1 and 8, and flexible dosing [25–100 mg eq. (i.e. 39–156 mg USA dosing)] once-monthly; or (b) RIS-LAI: bi-weekly injections of 25 mg on days 8 and 22, and flexible dosing (25–50 mg) starting from day 36, with allowed oral supplementation. Patients (n=747) were 59% men, 92% white, mean (s.d.) age of 41 (11.95) yr and 45% (n=339) completed the study. Mean (s.d.) change from baseline to endpoint in PANSS total score was: −11.6 (21.22) PP; and −14.4 (19.76) RIS-LAI (per-protocol analysis set, primary measure); least-squares means difference was −2.6 (95% CI −5.84 to 0.61), with a prespecified 5-point non-inferiority margin. PP's suboptimal dosing regimen (<150 mg eq. initial dose) resulted in lower median plasma levels of the active moiety in PP-treated vs. RIS-LAI-treated patients. Insomnia was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event, with a similar incidence in both groups (15%). PP did not demonstrate comparable efficacy to RIS-LAI, which may be attributable to the initiation dosing strategy employed. Tolerability of both treatments was comparable to previous studies, with no new safety signals detected.

Palmitoylation involves the reversible posttranslational addition of palmitate to cysteines and promotes membrane binding and subcellular localization. Recent advancements in the detection and identification of palmitoylated proteins have led to multiple palmitoylation proteomics studies but these datasets are contained within large supplemental tables, making downstream analysis and data mining time-consuming and difficult. Consequently, we curated the data from 15 palmitoylation proteomics studies into one compendium containing 1,838 genes encoding palmitoylated proteins; representing approximately 10% of the genome. Enrichment analysis revealed highly significant enrichments for Gene Ontology biological processes, pathway maps, and process networks related to the nervous system. Strikingly, 41% of synaptic genes encode a palmitoylated protein in the compendium. The top disease associations included cancers and diseases and disorders of the nervous system, with Schizophrenia, HD, and pancreatic ductal carcinoma among the top five, suggesting that aberrant palmitoylation may play a pivotal role in the balance of cell death and survival. This compendium provides a much-needed resource for cell biologists and the palmitoylation field, providing new perspectives for cancer and neurodegeneration.