Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundIn this single-arm study, the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy were evaluated in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).MethodsThis study included patients with ESCC of clinical stages II–IVA who underwent surgery within 4 to 6 weeks after completing treatment with pembrolizumab (200 mg) combined with a conventional chemotherapy regimen (3 cycles). The safety and efficacy of this combination treatment were evaluated as primary endpoints of the study.ResultsFrom April 2019 to August 2020, a total of 18 patients (including 14 men) were enrolled, of whom 13 patients progressed to surgery. Postoperative pathology revealed a major pathological response (MPR) in 9 cases (9/13, 69.2%) and a pathological complete response (pCR) in 6 cases (6/13, 46.2%). Five patients (5/18, 27.8%) experienced serious treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of grades 3–4. At the time of data cutoff (Mar 25, 2022), the shortest duration of follow-up was 17.8 months. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in pretreatment specimens was not significantly associated with the percentage of residual viable tumor (RVT) (r=−0.55, P=0.08). Changes in counts of CD68+ macrophage between pre- and post-treatment specimens were weakly correlated with RVT (r=0.71; P=0.07), while a positive correlation was observed between postoperative forkhead box P3-positive (Foxp3)+T cells/CD4+Tcells ratios and RVT (r=0.84, P = 0.03).ConclusionsThe combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for ESCC is associated with a high pathological response and immunologic effects in the tumor microenvironment (TME). It has acceptable toxicity and great efficacy, suggesting a strong rationale for its further evaluation in randomized clinical trials (RCTs).Trial RegistrationChiCTR2100048917.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1601125.].

Purpose Previous studies have reported the benefit of dual HER2-targeting combined to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-amplified breast cancer (HER2 + BC). Moreover, besides the cardiac toxicity following their association to Trastuzumab, anthracyclines chemotherapy may not profit all patients. The NeoTOP study was designed to evaluate the complementary action of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab, and the relevance of an anthracycline-based regimen according to TOP2A amplification status. Methods Open-label, multicentre, phase II study. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 with untreated, operable, histologically confirmed HER2 + BC. After centralized review of TOP2A status, TOP2A-amplified (TOP2A+) patients received FEC100 for 3 cycles then 3 cycles of Trastuzumab (8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg), Pertuzumab (840 mg/kg then 420 mg/kg), and Docetaxel (75mg/m 2 then 100mg/m 2 ). TOP2A-not amplified (TOP2A-) patients received 6 cycles of Docetaxel (75mg/m 2 ) and Carboplatin (target AUC 6 mg/ml/min) plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab. Primary endpoint was pathological Complete Response (pCR) using Chevallier’s classification. Secondary endpoints included pCR (Sataloff), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Out of 74 patients, 41 and 33 were allocated to the TOP2A + and TOP2A- groups respectively. pCR rates (Chevallier) were 74.4% (95%CI: 58.9–85.4) vs. 71.9% (95%CI: 54.6–84.4) in the TOP2A + vs. TOP2A- groups. pCR rates (Sataloff), 5-year PFS and OS were 70.6% (95%CI: 53.8–83.2) vs. 61.5% (95%CI: 42.5–77.6), 82.4% (95%CI: 62.2–93.6) vs. 100% (95%CI: 74.1–100), and 90% (95%CI: 69.8–98.3) vs. 100% (95%CI: 74.1–100). Toxicity profile was consistent with previous reports. Conclusion Our results showed high pCR rates with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab associated to chemotherapy. They were similar in TOP2A + and TOP2A- groups and the current role of neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy remains questioned. Trial registration number NCT02339532 (registered on 14/12/14).

Purpose Neoadjuvant clinical trials with dual HER2 blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated high rates of pathological complete response (pCR) in HER2-positive early breast cancer (BC). We investigated whether the benefit on pCR seen in clinical trials is confirmed in a real-world setting. Methods Multicenter, retrospective study in patients with HER2-positive early BC receiving neoadjuvant treatment with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in routine clinical practice ( n  = 243). The primary endpoint was total pCR (tpCR) (ypT0/is ypN0). Results A total of 243 evaluable patients were included. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab were combined with anthracyclines and taxanes in 74.1% of patients, with single-agent taxane in 11.1% of patients and with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) in 14.4% of patients. The tpCR rate was 66.4%:71% with anthracyclines and taxanes, 59.3% with single-agent taxane, and 48.6% with platinum-based combinations. The tpCR rate was higher among patients with hormone receptor (HR)-negative tumors (80.9%) vs HR-positive tumors (55.4%) ( p  < 0.001). A pCR in the breast (ypT0/is) was achieved in 67.6% of patients. Of 143 patients who showed radiological complete response (rCR) (62%), 112 (78.3%) patients also achieved tpCR. Assessment of rCR by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed the highest negative predictive value (NPV) for predicting tpCR (83.5%). Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 58.7% of patients. Grade 3 and grade 4 toxicities were reported in 33 (18.2%) and 12 (6.6%) patients, respectively. No toxicity leading to death was reported. Conclusions This real-world analysis shows that neoadjuvant pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy achieve comparable or even higher rates of tpCR than those seen in clinical trials. The pCR benefit is higher in HR-negative tumors. The assessment of rCR by MRI showed the highest ability for predicting pCR. In addition, this neoadjuvant strategy confers an acceptable safety profile.

Purpose Many patients with early breast cancer (eBC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy do not achieve pathological complete response (pCR), which is a prognostic factor. We examined the role of HER2-low expression in predicting pCR and prognosis in HER2-negative eBC. Methods We evaluated patients with stage I-III HER2-negative BC, treated between 2013 and 2023 at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London. Tumors were classified based on estrogen receptor (ER) status and into HER2-low and HER2-zero subgroups. We analyzed pCR rates, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results 754 patients were included in the analysis. pCR rate was 8.9% in the ER+ /HER2-low, 16.5% in the ER+ /HER2-zero, 38.9% in the ER- ER-/HER2-low and 35.9% in the ER-/HER2-zero eBC ( p  < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed a significantly lower pCR rate in HER2-low compared to HER2-zero BC in the ER+ subgroup. At a median follow-up of 63.8 months (59.9–67.4), we observed longer OS in HER2-low compared to HER2-zero patients in the overall and in the ER+ population. There was no predictive or prognostic impact of HER2-low status in the ER- population. Conclusion This study supports the interpretation of HER2 status as a possible prognostic and predictive biomarker for HER2-negative eBC, especially among patients with ER+ disease.

The standard treatment for breast cancer typically includes surgery, often followed by systemic therapy and individualized treatment regimens. However, there is growing interest in identifying pre-therapeutic biomarkers that can predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This study systematically evaluated various analytical parameters, including age, TNM stage, histological type, molecular subtype, and several biomarker ratios, such as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). We aimed to assess the predictive value of these parameters regarding the tumor’s response rate to NACT. The analysis revealed a statistically significant association between the pathological complete response—pCR (absence of any detectable cancer cells in the tissue following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT))—rate and NLR in the subgroup with values between 1 and 3 (p = 0.001). The optimal cut-off for PLR was determined to be 120.45, with 80.55% of patients achieving pCR showing PLR values below this threshold (p = 0.000). Similarly, the LMR cut-off was found to be 12.34, with 77.77% of patients with pCR having LMR values below this threshold (p = 0.002). Additionally, lower pre-therapeutic values of NLR (p < 0.001), PLR (p = 0.002), SII (p = 0.001), and LMR (p = 0.001) were significantly correlated with pCR compared to the non-pCR subgroup (p < 0.005). These findings highlight the predictive potential of these biomarkers for achieving pCR following NACT. Our study supports the hypothesis that pre-therapeutic values of NLR, PLR, SII, and LMR can serve as predictive biomarkers for pCR in breast cancer patients undergoing NACT. However, the PNI did not demonstrate predictive potential in relation to pCR. These biomarkers may provide valuable insights into patient prognosis and guide personalized treatment strategies.

Colorectal carcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and indeed, rectal cancer accounting for approximately one third of newly diagnosed patients. Gold standard in the treatment of rectal cancer is a multimodality approach, aiming at a good control of the local disease. Distant recurrences are the major cause of mortality. Currently, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC) patients undergo a combined treatment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, followed by surgery. Eventually, more chemotherapy, namely adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), may be necessary. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) is an emerging approach aimed to reduce distant metastases and improve local control. Several ongoing studies are analyzing whether this new approach could improve oncological outcomes. Published results were encouraging, but the heterogeneity of protocols in use, makes the comparison and interpretation of data rather complex. One of the major concerns regarding TNT administration is related to its effect on larger and more advanced cancers that might not undergo similar down-staging as smaller, early-stage tumors. This minireview, based on a systematic literature search of randomized clinical trials and meta-analysis, summarizes current knowledge on TNT. The aim was to confirm or refute whether or not current practice of TNT is based on relevant evidence, to establish the quality of that evidence, and to address any uncertainty or variation in practice that may be occurring. A tentative grouping of general study characteristics, clinical features and treatments characteristics has been undertaken to evaluate if the reported studies are sufficiently homogeneous in terms of subjects involved, interventions, and outcomes to provide a meaningful idea of which patients are more likely to gain from this treatment.

Background The benefit of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) following modern primary systemic therapy (PST) in HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2 + BC) remains under investigation. The current study evaluates RNI practice patterns and outcomes based on the pathological response to PST in clinically node-positive (cN+) HER2 + BC. Methods TRYPHAENA and NeoSphere are two randomized phase II trials that investigated PST for HER2 + BC. The current study is a pooled analysis of both trials, focusing on cN + patients treated with HER2-targeted PST followed by breast-conserving surgery. The primary goal is to describe patterns of RNI practicein this population and its impact on breast cancer recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS). Results Our analysis included a total of 90 patients with cN + disease. Complete nodal pathological response was achieved in 53 patients (58.9%). Patients with ypN0 had a 5-year LRRFS of 95.83% whereas patients with ypN + had 5-year LRRFS of 87.43% ( p  = 0.105). RNI was used in 16 ypN0 (48.5%) patients and 17 ypN+ (51.5%) patients. Patients treated with RNI had 5-year LRRFS of 93.4% as compared to 92.5% in the no RNI group ( p  = 0.868). Distant metastasis was detected in 5 patients (5%) with the most common sites being: liver, lung, bone, and CNS. Locoregional recurrence was significantly associated with distant failure ( p  = 0.002). Conclusions cN + HER2 + BC patients who achieve ypN0 after PST have excellent locoregional control. In contrast, patients with ypN + tend to have lower locoregional control. The utility of RNI in HER2 + BC warrants further investigation.

Purpose Breast cancer is a primary cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a cornerstone treatment for locally advanced, non-metastatic breast cancer. Achieving pathological complete response (pCR) is often used as a surrogate marker for long-term outcomes. This study examines the impact of obesity, defined by a body mass index (BMI) over 30 kg/m 2 , on achieving pCR in patients with early stage breast cancer (eBC) undergoing NACT. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with eBC treated with NACT at the University of Tübingen. The primary objective was to assess the impact of obesity on achieving pCR. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between pre-treatment BMI and pCR, adjusting for covariates such as age, tumor stage, grading, and chemotherapy intensity. Results The study included 325 patients, with 24% classified as obese. While the univariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant impact of obesity on the odds ratio of achieving pCR, the multivariate analysis, accounting for covariates, demonstrated that obese patients had a significantly higher likelihood of achieving pCR. Conclusion In this retrospective study, obesity significantly affected the likelihood of achieving pCR in patients with eBC cancer undergoing NACT after adjusting for covariates. While obesity is a known risk factor for breast cancer development and progression, its impact on the efficacy of NACT in terms of achieving pCR was positive in our study. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate in the literature, though the retrospective design and potential uncontrolled factors should be considered.

Clinical T3 (cT3) breast cancer (BC) presents a challenge for achieving cosmetically acceptable breast conservation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is commonly used for cytoreduction in these high-risk cancers. MammaPrint® risk-of-recurrence and BluePrint® molecular subtyping genomic signatures have demonstrated high accuracy in predicting chemotherapy benefits. Here, we examined the utility of MammaPrint/BluePrint for predicting pathological Complete Response (pCR) rates to NAC among 404 patients diagnosed with cT3 early-stage BC. The association of genomic subtype and clinical features with the likelihood of pCR was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. Differences in pCR rates between genomic risk categories were evaluated by a two-sided proportional z-test and stratified by nodal status. MammaPrint/BluePrint subtyping was associated with significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for pCR in MammaPrint High-Risk/BluePrint Basal-Type (OR = 3.06, 95% CI: 1.15–8.19, p = 0.025) and HER2-Type (OR = 6.27, 95% CI: 2.19–19.38, p = 0.001) compared to BluePrint Luminal-Type. Of the 209 patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative disease, 6.7% achieved pCR, and MammaPrint High-Risk was associated with a significantly higher pCR rate (9.3%) compared to MammaPrint Low-Risk cancers (0%), regardless of nodal involvement (p = 0.036). These data show that for patients with MammaPrint Low-Risk, cT3 tumors are less likely to have clinically impactful cytoreduction from NAC, regardless of nodal involvement.