Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
1 result(s) for "pavement-sealed crack"
Sort by:
Shuffle Attention-Based Pavement-Sealed Crack Distress Detection
To enhance the detection of pavement-sealed cracks and ensure the long-term stability of pavement performance, a novel approach called the shuffle attention-based pavement-sealed crack detection is proposed. This method consists of three essential components: the feature extraction network, the detection head, and the Wise Intersection over Union loss function. Within both the feature extraction network and the detection head, the shuffle attention module is integrated to capture the high-dimensional semantic information of pavement-sealed cracks by combining spatial and channel attention in parallel. The two-way detection head with multi-scale feature fusion efficiently combines contextual information for pavement-sealed crack detection. Additionally, the Wise Intersection over Union loss function dynamically adjusts the gradient gain, enhancing the accuracy of bounding box fitting and coverage area. Experimental results highlight the superiority of our proposed method, with higher mAP@0.5 (98.02%), Recall (0.9768), and F1-score (0.9680) values compared to the one-stage state-of-the-art methods, showcasing improvements of 0.81%, 1.8%, and 2.79%, respectively.