Explore the vast range of titles available.

The aim of our case-control study was to identify novel biomarkers of Crohn’s disease (CD) that hold the potential to be employed in both disease diagnosis and monitoring activity. In the context of the contribution of intestinal barrier integrity and immune response to the pathogenesis of CD, we assessed the serum concentrations of proguanylin (pro-GN), pentraxin 3 (PTX3) and S100A12 in 20 patients before and after anti-inflammatory treatment, as well as in 20 healthy individuals. Statistical analyses revealed a significant difference in the levels of pro-GN (5.5 vs. 11.35, p < 0.001), PTX3 (2117.9 vs. 1608.37, p < 0.05) and S100A12 (79.4 vs. 19.74, p < 0.001) between pretreatment patients with CD and healthy individuals. Moreover, we noted a significant relationship between the serum profile of PTX3 and disease activity, expressed as CDAI, both before (p < 0.005, r = 0.63) and after (p < 0.05, r = 0.60) treatment. A similar correlation was noted in the case of S100A12 (p < 0.005, r = 0.81), albeit exclusively within the post-treatment group of patients. Anti-inflammatory treatment resulted in an elevation of pro-GN concentration (5.5 vs. 8.04, p < 0.001) and a reduction in PTX3 level (2117.9 vs. 1609.5, p < 0.05) in the serum of patients with CD. In comparison to our previous research conducted on a group of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), those with CD exhibited reduced levels of PTX3 (2117.9 vs. 3197.05, p < 0.005) and elevated concentrations of S100A12 (79.4 vs. 39.36, p < 0.05). The results obtained from this investigation suggest that measurements of pro-GN, PTX3 and S100A12 could prove beneficial in the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. Assessment of changes in the serum profile of PTX3 appears to be a good marker of response to treatment but also, along with analysis of S100A12 protein serum levels, a useful marker in differentiating CD from UC.

The aim of this research was to investigate potential new biomarkers which could be used in the clinical practice of ulcerative colitis (UC). Given the crucial role of intestinal barrier integrity and inflammation in the pathogenesis of UC, the serum profile of proteins linked to intestinal barrier and pro-inflammatory neutrophil products may be useful in diagnosing and monitoring the activity of the disease. We measured serum levels of proguanylin (pro-GN), S100A12, and pentraxin 3 (PTX3) in 31 patients with UC before and after a year of biological treatment, as well as in 20 healthy individuals. Significant differences in the serum profiles of pro-GN (5.27 vs. 11.35, p < 0.001), S100A12 (39.36 vs. 19.74, p < 0.001) and PTX3 (3197.05 vs. 1608.37, p < 0.001) were observed between pre-treatment patients with UC and healthy individuals. Furthermore, in UC patients prior to treatment, the levels of S100A12 (p < 0.0005; r = 0.628) and PTX3 (p < 0.05; r = 0.371) were correlated with disease activity as measured by the Mayo scale. Following a year of biological treatment with adalimumab, the concentration of pro-GN significantly increased (5.27 vs. 6.68, p < 0.005) in the blood of UC patients, while the level of PTX-3 decreased (3197.05 vs. 1946.4, p < 0.0001). Our study demonstrates the usefulness of pro-GN, S100A12, and PTX3 measurements in diagnosing and monitoring the activity of UC.

A gastrointestinal–renal natriuretic signaling axis has been proposed to regulate sodium excretion in response to acute sodium ingestion. Such an axis is thought to be regulated by a gastrointestinal sodium sensor coupled to the activation/release of a natriuretic signal and could have important clinical and scientific implications. Here we systematically tested for this putative axis and the potential involvement of the gastrointestinal-derived natriuretic prohormones prouroguanylin and proguanylin in 15 healthy volunteers. There was no difference in sodium excretion following equivalent oral or intravenous sodium loads during either high- or low-sodium diets. Furthermore, serum concentrations of prouroguanylin and proguanylin did not increase, did not differ following oral or intravenous sodium, and did not correlate with sodium excretion. Thus, our results do not support an acute gastrointestinal–renal natriuretic axis or a central role for prouroguanylin or proguanylin in humans. If such an axis does exist, it is not characterized by a significant difference in the pattern of sodium excretion following either an oral or intravenous sodium load.