Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
128,893
result(s) for
"proteomics"
Sort by:
Proteomics
Recent patents relating to protein identification, characterization and analysis.
Journal Article
Data‐independent acquisition‐based SWATH‐MS for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial
Many research questions in fields such as personalized medicine, drug screens or systems biology depend on obtaining consistent and quantitatively accurate proteomics data from many samples. SWATH‐MS is a specific variant of data‐independent acquisition (DIA) methods and is emerging as a technology that combines deep proteome coverage capabilities with quantitative consistency and accuracy. In a SWATH‐MS measurement, all ionized peptides of a given sample that fall within a specified mass range are fragmented in a systematic and unbiased fashion using rather large precursor isolation windows. To analyse SWATH‐MS data, a strategy based on peptide‐centric scoring has been established, which typically requires prior knowledge about the chromatographic and mass spectrometric behaviour of peptides of interest in the form of spectral libraries and peptide query parameters. This tutorial provides guidelines on how to set up and plan a SWATH‐MS experiment, how to perform the mass spectrometric measurement and how to analyse SWATH‐MS data using peptide‐centric scoring. Furthermore, concepts on how to improve SWATH‐MS data acquisition, potential trade‐offs of parameter settings and alternative data analysis strategies are discussed.
Graphical Abstract
SWATH‐MS combines deep proteome coverage with quantitative consistency and accuracy and is often the method of choice for personalized medicine, drug screens or systems biology. This tutorial provides guidelines on how to set up SWATH‐MS experiments, perform the mass spectrometric measurements and analyse the data.
Journal Article
Diagnostics and correction of batch effects in large‐scale proteomic studies: a tutorial
Advancements in mass spectrometry‐based proteomics have enabled experiments encompassing hundreds of samples. While these large sample sets deliver much‐needed statistical power, handling them introduces technical variability known as batch effects. Here, we present a step‐by‐step protocol for the assessment, normalization, and batch correction of proteomic data. We review established methodologies from related fields and describe solutions specific to proteomic challenges, such as ion intensity drift and missing values in quantitative feature matrices. Finally, we compile a set of techniques that enable control of batch effect adjustment quality. We provide an R package, \"proBatch\", containing functions required for each step of the protocol. We demonstrate the utility of this methodology on five proteomic datasets each encompassing hundreds of samples and consisting of multiple experimental designs. In conclusion, we provide guidelines and tools to make the extraction of true biological signal from large proteomic studies more robust and transparent, ultimately facilitating reliable and reproducible research in clinical proteomics and systems biology.
Graphical Abstract
In mass spectrometry‐based proteomics, handling large sample sets introduces technical variability known as batch effects. This tutorial provides guidelines and tools for the assessment, normalization, and batch correction of proteomics data.
Journal Article
Subcellular proteomics
This PrimeView highlights the different techniques used for acquiring information on the spatial organization of proteins within the cell.
Journal Article
Ultra‐high sensitivity mass spectrometry quantifies single‐cell proteome changes upon perturbation
Single‐cell technologies are revolutionizing biology but are today mainly limited to imaging and deep sequencing. However, proteins are the main drivers of cellular function and in‐depth characterization of individual cells by mass spectrometry (MS)‐based proteomics would thus be highly valuable and complementary. Here, we develop a robust workflow combining miniaturized sample preparation, very low flow‐rate chromatography, and a novel trapped ion mobility mass spectrometer, resulting in a more than 10‐fold improved sensitivity. We precisely and robustly quantify proteomes and their changes in single, FACS‐isolated cells. Arresting cells at defined stages of the cell cycle by drug treatment retrieves expected key regulators. Furthermore, it highlights potential novel ones and allows cell phase prediction. Comparing the variability in more than 430 single‐cell proteomes to transcriptome data revealed a stable‐core proteome despite perturbation, while the transcriptome appears stochastic. Our technology can readily be applied to ultra‐high sensitivity analyses of tissue material, posttranslational modifications, and small molecule studies from small cell counts to gain unprecedented insights into cellular heterogeneity in health and disease.
Synopsis
A new ultra‐high sensitivity LC‐MS workflow increases sensitivity by up to two orders of magnitude and enables true single‐cell proteome analysis. In‐depth comparison indicates that the single‐cell transcriptome is stochastic while the single‐cell proteome is complete and stable.
A highly optimized data independent acquisition powered single‐cell proteomics workflow including sub‐µl sample preparation, very low flow chromatography and trapped ion mobility mass spectrometry (diaPASEF) is presented.
Single‐cell proteome analysis is performed by injecting cells one‐by‐one across the cell cycle into the LC‐MS and correctly identifies cell states.
Single‐cell proteome information is highly complementary to single‐cell transcriptome information.
At the single‐cell level the proteome is quantitatively and qualitatively stable, while the transcriptome is stochastic.
Graphical Abstract
A new ultra‐high sensitivity LC‐MS workflow increases sensitivity by up to two orders of magnitude and enables true single‐cell proteome analysis. In‐depth comparison indicates that the single‐cell transcriptome is stochastic while the single‐cell proteome is complete and stable.
Journal Article