Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
2
result(s) for
"protists with uncertain phylogenetic affiliations"
Sort by:
Glissandra oviformis n. sp.: a novel predatory flagellate illuminates the character evolution within the eukaryotic clade CRuMs
2025
Culturing protists offers a powerful approach to exploring eukaryotic diversity, especially for deep-branching lineages. In this study, we cultured and described a novel protist species, named Glissandra oviformis n sp. within the poorly studied and unclassified genus Glissandra . While an SSU rDNA gene phylogeny failed to resolve its phylogenetic placement in the eukaryotic tree, a phylogenomic analysis of 340 proteins indicated G. oviformis as a member of the CRuMs clade. Prior to this study, this clade consisted of diverse heterotrophic amoeba and flagellates, and lacked clear synapomorphies. Ultrastructural observations revealed that G. oviformis shares the characteristics with some CRuMs members, including the pellicle underlying the plasma membrane and an internal sleeve surrounding the central pair of the axoneme at the flagellar transitional region. Our findings suggest potential shared characteristics and synapomorphies for CRuMs and contribute to a deeper understanding of the character evolution within this clade.
Journal Article
Protists with Uncertain Phylogenetic Affiliations for Resolving the Deep Tree of Eukaryotes
2025
Resolving the eukaryotic tree of life (eToL) remains a fundamental challenge in biology. Much of eukaryotic phylogenetic diversity is occupied by unicellular microbial eukaryotes (i.e., protists). Among these, the phylogenetic positions of a significant number of lineages remain unresolved due to limited data and ambiguous traits. To address this issue, we introduce the term “PUPAs” (protists with uncertain phylogenetic affiliations) to collectively describe these lineages, instead of using vague or inconsistent labels, such as incertae sedis or orphan taxa. Historically, protists were classified based solely on morphological features, and many with divergent cell structures were left unplaced in the eToL. With the advent of sequence-based approaches, the phylogenetic affiliations of some PUPAs have been clarified using molecular markers, such as small subunit ribosomal DNA. The combination of technological progress and continuous efforts to cultivate diverse protists, including PUPAs and novel protists, now enables phylogenetic analyses based on hundreds of proteins, providing their concrete placements in the eToL. For example, these advances have led to the discovery of new deep-branching lineages (e.g., Hemimastigophora), the resolution of relationships among major groups (e.g., Microheliella, which linked Cryptista and Archaeplastida), and insights into evolutionary innovations within specific clades (e.g., Glissandra). In this review, we summarize current consensus in eukaryotic phylogeny and highlight recent findings on PUPAs whose phylogenetic affiliations have been clarified. We also discuss a few lineages for which the phylogenetic homes remain unsettled, the evolutionary implications of these discoveries, and the remaining challenges in resolving the complete eToL.
Journal Article