Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundEndobiliary radiofrequency ablation (EB-RFA) has emerged as a palliative treatment for malignant biliary strictures (MBSs); however, concerns about complications related to thermal injury remain. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of EB-RFA with a novel catheter for MBS.MethodsPatients with inoperable cancer causing MBS were randomly assigned to either the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) group or the non-RFA group. The RFA group underwent EB-RFA at the stricture site with a temperature-controlled catheter (ELRA™; STARmed Co., Goyang, Korea) followed by deployment of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS). For the non-RFA group, only SEMS placement was performed. The duration of stent patency, overall survival (OS), and 30-day complication rate were evaluated. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT02646514).ResultsA total of 48 patients were enrolled (24 in each group). During a median follow-up period of 135.0 days (RFA group) and 119.5 days (non-RFA group), the 90-day stent patency rate, median duration of stent patency, and median OS were not different between the groups (58.3% vs. 45.8% [P = 0.386], 132.0 days vs. 116.0 days [P = 0.440], and 244.0 days vs. 180.0 days [P = 0.281], respectively). In the RFA group, procedure-related complications including thermal injury-related complications, such as bile duct perforation or hemobilia, were not reported. The early complication (< 7 days) rates were not different between the groups (4.2% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.609), and there were no late complications (7–30 days) in both groups.ConclusionEB-RFA with a temperature-controlled catheter followed by SEMS placement for patients with inoperable MBS can be safe and feasible with acceptable biliary patency.

Abstract Purpose of ReviewBased on good local control rates and an excellent safety profile, guidelines consider thermal ablation the gold standard to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, efficacy decreases exponentially with increasing tumour size. The preferred treatment for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare safety and efficacy of local ablative treatments for unresectable intermediate-size CRLM (3–5 cm).Recent FindingsWe systematically searched for publications reporting treatment outcomes of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM treated with thermal ablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE) or stereotactic ablative body-radiotherapy (SABR). No comparative studies or randomized trials were found. Literature to assess effectiveness was limited and there was substantial heterogeneity in outcomes and study populations. Per-patient local control ranged 22–90% for all techniques; 22–89% (8 series) for thermal ablation, 44% (1 series) for IRE, and 67–90% (1 series) for SABR depending on radiation dose.SummaryFocal ablative therapy is safe and can induce long-term disease control, even for intermediate-size CRLM. Although SABR and tumuor-bracketing techniques such as IRE are suggested to be less susceptible to size, evidence to support any claims of superiority of one technique over the other is unsubstantiated by the available evidence. Future prospective comparative studies should address local-tumour-progression-free-survival, local control rate, overall survival, adverse events, and quality-of-life.

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is positively correlated with age, and the population of patients with HCC was also older at the time of clinical diagnosis. In the SURF trial, elderly people aged ≥80 years were excluded. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients aged over 80 years. Patients who underwent RFA at our institution for the initial treatment of HCC tumors with largest diameters of ≤3 cm, and ≤3 HCC nodules from January 2011 to December 2023. Treatment outcomes and prognoses were examined in the elderly group (≥80 years) and in the nonelderly group (<80 years). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the factors associated with treatment outcomes and prognoses. Of the 518 eligible patients, 136 patients were aged ≥80 years. The median overall survival (OS) values were 80 (95%CI; 60-96) and 123 (95%CI; 101-nucleotide analogs (NA)) months (p = 0.021) in the elderly and nonelderly groups, respectively. For liver disease-related deaths, the median OS values were 97 (95% CI; 80-NA) and NR (95% CI; NA-NA) months (p = 0.62) in the elderly and nonelderly groups, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with OS were ALBI grade 2 or 3 (HR, 1.67, 95%CI; 1.07-2.60), DCP ≥ 40 mAU/ml (HR, 2.08, 95%CI; 1.42-3.04), persistent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (HR, 5.46, 95%CI; 3.08-9.69), and nonviral liver disease (HR, 4.19, 95%CI; 2.32-7.57). The median recurrence-free survival values were 16 (95%CI; 14-22) and 26 (95%CI; 19-30) months, respectively (p = 0.023). HCC recurrence was significantly associated with the male sex (HR, 1.50, 95%CI; 1.17-1.93), elderly group (HR, 1.37, 95%CI; 1.10-1.95), ALBI grade 2 or 3 (HR, 1.39, 95%CI; 1.07-1.80), DCP ≥ 40 mAU/ml (HR, 1.41, 95%CI; 1.10-1.81), and persistent HCV infection (HR, 1.67, 95%CI; 1.30-2.15). The factors associated with liver disease-related death were ALBI grade 2 or 3 (HR, 2.17, 95% CI; 1.26-3.75), DCP ≥ 40 mAU/ml (HR, 2.33, 95% CI; 1.47-3.69), and persistent HCV infection (HR, 2.22, 95% CI; 1.39-3.56). In RFA for tumors with diameters of ≤3 cm and ≤3 HCC nodules, age over ≥80 years was not a significant factor associated with OS or liver disease-related death. The results support that RFA would be a promising treatment option for patients with HCC patients aged ≥80 years.

PurposeTo assess safety and outcome of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) as compared to systemic chemotherapy and partial hepatectomy (PH) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).MethodsMEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized trials and comparative observational studies with multivariate analysis and/or matching were included. Guidelines from National Guideline Clearinghouse and Guidelines International Network were assessed using the AGREE II instrument.ResultsThe search revealed 3530 records; 328 were selected for full-text review; 48 were included: 8 systematic reviews, 2 randomized studies, 26 comparative observational studies, 2 guideline-articles and 10 case series; in addition 13 guidelines were evaluated. Literature to assess the effectiveness of ablation was limited. RFA + systemic chemotherapy was superior to chemotherapy alone. PH was superior to RFA alone but not to RFA + PH or to MWA. Compared to PH, RFA showed fewer complications, MWA did not. Outcomes were subject to residual confounding since ablation was only employed for unresectable disease.ConclusionThe results from the EORTC-CLOCC trial, the comparable survival for ablation + PH versus PH alone, the potential to induce long-term disease control and the low complication rate argue in favour of ablation over chemotherapy alone. Further randomized comparisons of ablation to current-day chemotherapy alone should therefore be considered unethical. Hence, the highest achievable level of evidence for unresectable CRLM seems reached. The apparent selection bias from previous studies and the superior safety profile mandate the setup of randomized controlled trials comparing ablation to surgery.

Cardiac radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has received substantial attention for the treatment of multiple arrhythmias. In this scenario, there is an ever-growing demand for monitoring the temperature trend inside the tissue as it may allow an accurate control of the treatment effects, with a consequent improvement of the clinical outcomes. There are many methods for monitoring temperature in tissues undergoing RFA, which can be divided into invasive and non-invasive. This paper aims to provide an overview of the currently available techniques for temperature detection in this clinical scenario. Firstly, we describe the heat generation during RFA, then we report the principle of work of the most popular thermometric techniques and their features. Finally, we introduce their main applications in the field of cardiac RFA to explore the applicability in clinical settings of each method.

Abstract Context Thermal ablative techniques of the thyroid have recently gained clinical traction as a therapeutic alternative that provides symptomatic relief and confers potential advantages over surgery. A truly multidisciplinary technique, thyroid ablation is currently performed by endocrinologists, interventional radiologists, otolaryngologists, and endocrine surgeons. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), specifically, has seen widespread adoption, particularly in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules. This review summarizes current evidence on the application of RFA in benign thyroid nodules, and provides a start to finish overview of procedural preparation, performance, and outcomes. Evidence Acquisition A narrative review of literature focusing on RFA in the treatment of benign nodular disease was performed. Emphasis was placed on consensus statements, best practice guidelines, multi-institutional studies, and systematic reviews to summarize key concepts in candidacy, techniques, expectations, and outcomes. Findings RFA is increasingly recognized as a first-line treatment strategy in the management of symptomatic nonfunctional benign thyroid nodules. It can also be considered in functional thyroid nodules with small volumes or in patients ineligible for surgery. A targeted and efficacious technique, RFA results in gradual volume reduction that preserves the function of the surrounding thyroid parenchyma. Proper procedural technique, proficiency in ultrasound, and experience in ultrasound-guided procedures are instrumental to maintaining low complication rates and achieving successful ablation outcomes. Conclusions In pursuit of a personalized approach, physicians across disciplines are increasingly incorporating RFA into their treatment algorithms, most commonly for benign nodules. As with any intervention, thoughtful selection and implementation ensure a safe procedure with optimal patient benefit.

Abstract Background and Objectives Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment for patients with chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis; however, little is known about factors that predict procedure success. The current study evaluated the utility of genicular nerve blocks to predict the outcome of genicular nerve cooled radiofrequency ablation (cRFA) in patients with osteoarthritis. Methods This randomized comparative trial included patients with chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis. Participants were randomized to receive a genicular nerve block or no block prior to cRFA. Patients receiving a prognostic block that demonstrated ≥50% pain relief for six hours received cRFA. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction in knee pain at six months. Results Twenty-nine participants (36 knees) had cRFA following a prognostic block, and 25 patients (35 knees) had cRFA without a block. Seventeen participants (58.6%) in the prognostic block group and 16 (64.0%) in the no block group had ≥50% pain relief at six months (P = 0.34). A 15-point decrease in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index at six months was present in 17 of 29 (55.2%) in the prognostic block group and 15 of 25 (60%) in the no block group (P = 0.36). Conclusions This study demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in pain and physical function up to six months following cRFA. A prognostic genicular nerve block using a local anesthetic volume of 1 mL at each injection site and a threshold of ≥ 50% pain relief for subsequent cRFA eligibility did not improve the rate of treatment success.

Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are widely accepted techniques to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Although previous studies labelled thermal ablation inferior to surgical resection, the apparent selection bias when comparing patients with unresectable disease to surgical candidates, the superior safety profile, and the competitive overall survival results for the more recent reports mandate the setup of a randomized controlled trial. The objective of the COLLISION trial is to prove non-inferiority of thermal ablation compared to hepatic resection in patients with at least one resectable and ablatable CRLM and no extrahepatic disease. Methods In this two-arm, single-blind multi-center phase-III clinical trial, six hundred and eighteen patients with at least one CRLM (≤3 cm) will be included to undergo either surgical resection or thermal ablation of appointed target lesion(s) (≤3 cm). Primary endpoint is OS (overall survival, intention-to-treat analysis). Main secondary endpoints are overall disease-free survival (DFS), time to progression (TTP), time to local progression (TTLP), primary and assisted technique efficacy (PTE, ATE), procedural morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay, assessment of pain and quality of life (QoL), cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Discussion If thermal ablation proves to be non-inferior in treating lesions ≤3 cm, a switch in treatment-method may lead to a reduction of the post-procedural morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay and incremental costs without compromising oncological outcome for patients with CRLM. Trial registration NCT03088150 , January 11th 2017.

Background Although radiofrequency ablation is widely used in the treatment of arrhythmias, its role in septal reduction therapy of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is unclear. This meta‐analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency septal ablation for HOCM. Hypothesis Radiofrequency septal ablation is effective and safe for relieving obstruction and improving exercise capacity in patients with HOCM. Methods A systematic review of eligible studies that reported outcomes of patients with HOCM who underwent radiofrequency septal ablation was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ProQuest, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science database. Pooled estimates were calculated using random‐effects meta‐analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle‐Ottawa scale. Publication bias and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Results Eight studies with 91 patients (mean follow‐up 11.6 months) were included. The left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient at rest decreased significantly after radiofrequency septal ablation (pooled reduction: −58.8 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI] −64.3 to −53.5). A reduction was also found in the provoked LVOT gradient with a pooled reduction of −97.6 mmHg (95% CI: −124.4 to −87.1). An improvement of the New York Heart Association classification (mean: −1.4; 95% CI: −1.6 to −1.2) was found during follow‐up. The change in septal thickness was minimal and not statistically significant. Two procedure‐related deaths were documented, and complete heart block occurred in eight patients. Conclusions Radiofrequency septal ablation is effective and safe for relieving LVOT obstruction and improving exercise capacity in patients with HOCM.

Background: Patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee and patients post total knee arthroplasty often develop refractory, disabling chronic knee pain. Radiofrequency ablation, including conventional, pulsed, and cooled, has recently become more accepted as an interventional technique to manage chronic knee pain in patients who have failed conservative treatment or who are not suitable candidates for surgical treatment. Objective: This systematic review aimed to analyze published studies on radiofrequency ablation to provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding variations in procedures, nerve targets, adverse events, and temporal extent of clinical benefit. Study Design: A systematic review of published studies investigating conventional, pulsed, or cooled radiofrequency ablation in the setting of chronic knee pain. Methods: Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were reviewed for studies on radiofrequency ablation for patients with chronic knee pain through July 29, 2016. From the studies, the procedural details, outcomes after treatment, follow-up points, and complications were compiled and analyzed in this literature review. Included studies were analyzed for clinical relevance and strength of evidence was graded using either the NHLBI Quality assessment of controlled intervention studies or the NHLBI quality assessment for before-after (pre-post) studies with no control group. Results: Seventeen total publications were identified in the search, including articles investigating conventional, pulsed, or cooled radiofrequency ablation. These studies primarily targeted either the genicular nerves or used an intraarticular approach. Of the studies, 5 were small-sized randomized controlled trials, although one involved diathermy radiofrequency ablation. There were 8 retrospective or prospective case series and 4 case reports. Utilizing the strength of evidence grading, there is a low level of certainty to suggest a superior benefit between targeting the genicular nerve, an intraarticular approach, or targeting the larger nerves such as femoral and tibial nerves. Utilizing the strength of evidence grading, there is a low level of certainty in supporting the superiority of any specific RFA procedure modality. The majority of the studies report positive patient outcomes, but the inconsistent procedural methodology, inconsistent patient assessment measures, and small study sizes limit the applicability of any specific study to clinical practice. Limitations: While the wide search strategy included a variety of articles, broad conclusions and pooled data could not be obtained based on the studies analyzed. Conclusions: Overall, the studies showed promising results for the treatment of severe chronic knee pain by radiofrequency ablation at up to one year with minimal complications. Numerous studies, however, yielded concerns about procedural protocols, study quality, and patient follow-up. Radiofrequency ablation can offer substantial clinical and functional benefit to patients with chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis or post total knee arthroplasty. Key words: Radiofrequency ablation, knee osteoarthritis, knee pain, genicular nerve, total knee arthroplasty (TKA), cooled radiofrequency ablation, pulsed radiofrequency ablation