Explore the vast range of titles available.

In recent years, radionuclide therapy (RT) and targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) have gained great interest in cancer treatment. This is due to promising results obtained in both preclinical and clinical studies. However, a complete response is achieved in only a small percentage of patients that receive RT or TRT. As a consequence, there have been several strategies to improve RT and TRT outcomes including the combination of these treatments with other well-established anti-cancer therapies, for example, chemotherapy. Combinations of RT and TRT with other therapies with distinct mechanisms of action represent a promising strategy. As for prostate cancer and breast cancer, the two most prevalent cancer types worldwide, several combination-based therapies have been evaluated. In this review, we will provide an overview of the RT and TRT agents currently used or being investigated in combination with hormone therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer and breast cancer.

There is a critical need for innovative therapies beyond the current standard of care for meningiomas and gliomas. Radioligand therapy (RLT), with its theranostic approach, holds significant promise in this regard. Although several reviews on this topic have been published, none yet have combined the utilization of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) analysis, along with a dedicated subsection specifically addressing ongoing and completed clinical trials. This review aims to fill this gap in the literature by providing a comprehensive assessment of the current evidence on RLT in these tumors. Published studies were searched through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to 30 April 2025. Only original articles and clinical studies were included. Following a structured selection process, data extraction was performed. Study quality was critically appraised using CASP analyses. For clinical trials, an additional search was conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov beginning on 12 May 2025. A total of 30 studies were included in the review: 22 on meningiomas (290 patients) and 8 on gliomas (259 patients). For each study, first author, journal, year of publication, somatostatin receptor imaging, study design, radiopharmaceutical used, main topics, response criteria, toxicity assessment, post-therapy scintigraphy, number of patients, WHO grade, demographics, findings and median follow-up were considered. Among clinical trials, 22 were analyzed, including study site, year of first submission, proposed radiopharmaceutical, study type, primary endpoints and status. Efficacy and toxicity data were the primary focus, and the findings were generally encouraging. Studies on RLT in meningiomas was more robust, while in gliomas remained largely experimental. Nevertheless, the authors' critical appraisal was generally positive. Clinical trials confirmed the more \"traditional\" nature of research in meningiomas compared to gliomas. Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, RLT emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy in neuro-oncology. Its theranostic paradigm offers a distinctive advantage, enabling patient selection, treatment personalization, and response monitoring. The development of potentially novel radiopharmaceuticals and the conduct of well-designed multicenter trials with standardized response criteria are needed to further increase the impact and clinical translation of RLT in neuro-oncology.

This review article explores the evolving landscape of Molecular Radiotherapy (MRT), emphasizing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). The primary focus is on the transition from β-emitting radiopharmaceuticals to α-emitting agents in PRRT, offering a critical analysis of the radiobiological basis, clinical applications, and ongoing developments in Targeted Alpha Therapy (TAT). Through an extensive literature review, the article delves into the mechanisms and effectiveness of PRRT in targeting somatostatin subtype 2 receptors, highlighting both its successes and limitations. The discussion extends to the emerging paradigm of TAT, underlining its higher potency and specificity with α-particle emissions, which promise enhanced therapeutic efficacy and reduced toxicity. The review critically evaluates preclinical and clinical data, emphasizing the need for standardised dosimetry and a deeper understanding of the dose-response relationship in TAT. The review concludes by underscoring the significant potential of TAT in treating SSTR2-overexpressing cancers, especially in patients refractory to β-PRRT, while also acknowledging the current challenges and the necessity for further research to optimize treatment protocols.

Objectives: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) commonly relies on somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) agonists such as DOTA-TOC/TATE, which may show limited efficacy due to high hepatic uptake and therapy resistance in some patients. SSTR2 antagonists have demonstrated superior tumor targeting. This study aimed to establish the production and quality control of the Actinium-225-labeled SSTR2 antagonist [225Ac]Ac-DOTA-LM3 and to report in-human clinical experience with targeted alpha therapy (TAT). Methods: [225Ac]Ac-DOTA-LM3 was produced by radiolabeling DOTA-LM3 with Actinium-225 under validated conditions. Radiochemical conversion, purity, yield, and stability were assessed using radio-TLC, fractionated radio-HPLC combined with gamma spectroscopy, and in vitro serum stability testing. Clinical feasibility and therapeutic response were evaluated in a patient with metastatic neuroendocrine pancreatic neoplasm refractory to prior 177Lu-based PRRT. Results: Radiolabeling achieved reproducibly high radiochemical purity (>97%) and decay-corrected yields exceeding 80%. The radiopharmaceutical showed high in vitro stability with minimal release of free Actinium-225 over five days. Fractionated radio-HPLC enabled indirect purity assessment. In the reported patient, [225Ac]Ac-DOTA-LM3 therapy resulted in partial remission without clinically relevant hematologic, renal, or hepatic toxicity and was associated with marked clinical improvement. Conclusions: [225Ac]Ac-DOTA-LM3 can be produced with high purity and stability using clinically applicable procedures. In-human results suggest promising efficacy and safety, supporting further clinical investigation of Actinium-225-labeled SSTR2 antagonists for advanced NETs.

Background: α-emitting Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (α-PRRT) is emerging as a promising new generation of PRRT for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), providing enhanced tumor cell cytotoxicity and reduced irradiation of adjacent healthy tissues due to its high linear energy transfer (LET) and short particle range. This review summarizes available clinical evidence on α-PRRT using different α-emitting isotopes, including actinium-225, lead-212, and bismuth-213, in somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive NETs. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, as well as major oncology congress abstracts (ENETS, ESMO, ASCO). Eligible studies included clinical trials evaluating α-PRRT in patients with advanced SSTR-positive NETs, reporting therapeutic response and adverse events. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Seven studies encompassing 150 patients were included. Treatment with [225Ac]Ac-DOTATATE yielded a pooled ORR of 50% and a DCR of 81.3% across 121 evaluable patients. The best responses were observed in patients who had previously responded to β-PRRT (ORR 70.4%, DCR 96.3%), while one-third of β-PRRT–refractory patients achieved partial or complete responses. [212Pb]Pb-DOTAMTATE demonstrated an ORR of 56.8% and DCR of 100% in preliminary phase II results, though dysphagia was noted in 34% of patients. [213Bi]Bi-DOTATOC and [212Pb]Pb-VMT-α-NET studies also showed promising disease control with minimal grade ≥ 3 hematologic or renal toxicities. Across all studies, α-PRRT was well tolerated, with predominantly low-grade hematologic adverse events and no significant hepatic or renal toxicity. Conclusions: Clinical data to date indicate that α-PRRT offers meaningful therapeutic benefit in patients with metastatic or treatment-refractory NETs, achieving favorable response rates with manageable toxicity. Early results support α-PRRT as a potential first- or second-line therapeutic option. Ongoing phase III trials will be critical to confirm its long-term safety, survival outcomes, and role in routine clinical practice.

Purpose Radionuclide therapy with Lu-177-DOTATATE is well established for patients with advanced somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors with a standard schedule of 7.4 GBq at four occasions. However, this approach does not consider individual variability affecting the tumor radiation dose or dose to organs at risk. Therefore, it is important to assess more personalized strategies. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate individualized Lu-177-DOTATATE for which the number of cycles varied based on renal dosimetry. Methods Patients were eligible if they had a progressive, somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumor with a Ki 67 labeling index <20%. They received cycles of 7.4 GBq of Lu-177-DOTATATE at 10 +/- 2-week intervals until a predefined radiation dose to the kidneys was reached. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response (RECIST v 1.1). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity (CTCAE v. 4.0). Results Ninety-six patients who had received a median of 5 cycles (range 1-9) were evaluable for efficacy. The objective tumor response was 16% partial response, 66% stable disease, and 19% progressive disease. The median PFS and OS were 29 months and 47 months, respectively, and were significantly associated with kidney dose, performance status, and Ki 67 levels but not with tumor origin. The overall toxicity was mild, and the most common events were grade 1-2 anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. Grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in <10% of patients and was mostly hematological, with no grade 3-4 renal toxicity. Conclusion Individualized treatment with Lu-177-DOTATATE based on renal dosimetry is clearly feasible with low toxicity and promising efficacy, showing the potential to further improve outcome beyond the standard approach, and should be further assessed in randomized trials.

BackgroundNeuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a treatment modality with great potential, however, the predictive indicators for its efficacy remain unclear. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prognostic utility of quantitative metrics obtained from 18F-AlF-NOTATATE PET/CT at baseline and post-treatment for predicting response in PRRT in pediatric neuroblastoma.MethodsPatients with high-risk neuroblastoma that was either recurrent or resistant to treatment were prospectively enrolled for one or two cycles of 177Lu-PRRT. 18F-AlF-NOTATATE PET/CT was performed 1 month before and after PRRT; some patients underwent mid-treatment scans (7 weeks post-cycle). Treatment response was evaluated using a modified approach combining principles from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) criteria. Lesions were delineated semiautomatically to obtain maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), ratio of tumor SUVmax to liver SUVmax (SUVT/L), ratio of tumor SUVmax to spleen SUVmax (SUVT/S), tumor volume, total lesion activity, and heterogeneity values. Data were analyzed using independent t -tests or Mann–Whitney U tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the optimal cut-offs for PET parameters.ResultsTwenty-two patients (13 boys, 9 girls) were included. Baseline PET revealed significantly lower SUVT/S, tumor volume, and total lesion activity in non-progressive lesions ( p < 0.05); SUVT/S predicted efficacy (area under the curve [AUC], 0.588). Interim PET showed significantly lower SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVT/L, and SUVT/S in non-progressive lesions ( p < 0.05); SUVT/L predicted efficacy (AUC, 0.740). The SUVmax ratio (interim/baseline) had the highest predictive accuracy, with a cut-off of 1.25 (AUC, 0.796; sensitivity, 73.03%; specificity, 76.92%).ConclusionQuantitative baseline and mid-treatment 18F-AlF-NOTATATE PET/CT-derived parameters possess value in predicting PRRT response. An interim-to-baseline PET-derived lesion SUVmax ratio of ≤1.25 can effectively predict neuroblastoma response to PRRT.

BackgroundSomatostatin receptor 68Ga PET imaging is standard for evaluation of a patient’s suitability for 177Lu peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). The 68Ga PET serves to ensure sufficient somatostatin receptor expression, commonly evaluated qualitatively. The aim of this study is to investigate the quantitative relationships between uptake in 68Ga PET and absorbed doses in 177Lu therapy.MethodEighteen patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET imaging within 20 weeks prior to their first cycle of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE. Absorbed doses for therapy were estimated for tumours, kidney, spleen, and normal liver parenchyma using a hybrid SPECT/CT–planar method. Gallium-68 activity concentrations were retrieved from PET images and also used to calculate SUVs and normalized SUVs, using blood and tissue for normalization. The 68Ga activity concentrations per injected activity, SUVs, and normalized SUVs were compared with 177Lu activity concentrations 1 d post-injection and 177Lu absorbed doses. For tumours, for which there was a variable number per patient, both inter- and intra-patient correlations were analysed. Furthermore, the prediction of 177Lu tumour absorbed doses based on a combination of tumour-specific 68Ga activity concentrations and group-based estimates of the effective half-lives for grade 1 and 2 NETs was explored. ResultsFor normal organs, only spleen showed a significant correlation between the 68Ga activity concentration and 177Lu absorbed dose (r = 0.6). For tumours, significant, but moderate, correlations were obtained, with respect to both inter-patient (r = 0.7) and intra-patient (r = 0.45) analyses. The correlations to absorbed doses did not improve when using 68Ga SUVs or normalized SUVs. The relationship between activity uptakes for 68Ga PET and 177Lu SPECT was stronger, with correlation coefficients r = 0.8 for both inter- and intra-patient analyses. The 177Lu absorbed dose to tumour could be predicted from the 68Ga activity concentrations with a 95% coverage interval of − 65% to 248%.ConclusionsOn a group level, a high uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE is associated with high absorbed doses at 177Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy, but the relationship has a limited potential with respect to individual absorbed dose planning. Using SUV or SUV normalized to reference tissues do not improve correlations compared with using activity concentration per injected activity.

This review describes the basic principles of radiometal-theranostics and its dawn based on the development of the positron-emitting 86 Y and 86 Y-labeled radiopharmaceuticals to quantify biodistribution and dosimetry of 90 Y-labeled analogue therapeutics. The nuclear and inorganic development of 86 Y (including nuclear and cross section data, irradiation, radiochemical separation and recovery) led to preclinical and clinical evaluation of 86 Y-labeled citrate and EDTMP complexes and yielded organ radiation doses in terms of mGy/MBq 90 Y. The approach was extended to [ 86/90 Y]Y-DOTA-TOC, yielding again yielded organ radiation doses in terms of mGy/MBq 90 Y. The review further discusses the consequences of this early development in terms of further radiometals that were used ( 68 Ga, 177 Lu etc.), more chelators that were developed, new biological targets that were addressed (SSTR, PSMA, FAP, etc.) and subsequent generations of radiometal-theranostics that resulted out of that.

Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the modern world. Treatment modalities comprise radiation therapy, surgery, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Radiation therapy can be performed by using external or internal radiation therapy. However, each method has its unique properties which undertakes special role in cancer treatment, this question is brought up that: For cancer treatment, whether external radiation therapy is more efficient or internal radiation therapy one? To answer this question, we need to consider principles and structure of individual methods. In this review, principles and application of each method are considered and finally these two methods are compared with each other.