Explore the vast range of titles available.

The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected those who face historical and ongoing marginalization. In centering pandemic experience of recent immigrant women in the accommodation and food services sector in Canada, we examine how their precarious work translated to experiences of work precarity and wellbeing. This paper illuminates how pre-existing and ongoing marginalization are reproduced during a health crisis for those at the intersection of gender, race, migration, and labour inequities. Using semi-structured interviews and systematic analysis using the Work Precarity Framework, we found that the pandemic exacerbated pre-existing socio-economic marginalization and resulted in unique experiences of work precarity. The latter was experienced as precarity of work (unpredictable work hours and job or employment insecurity), precarity from work (inadequate incomes), and precarity at work (physical, psychological, and relational unsafety). Work precarity stood out as a social determinant of health in relation to its outcome of degraded mental health and wellbeing. Recognizing the role of policies in producing, reproducing, and distributing precarity, we recommend policy directions to reduce social inequities in pandemic recovery.

La pandémie mondiale de coronavirus de 2019 (COVID-19) a mis au jour et sans doute amplifié un grand nombre d’inégalités qui existaient déjà. Cette analyse explore la relation entre le salaire de personnes récemment immigrées et la pandémie. En particulier, nous essayons de répondre empiriquement à la question suivante : « La pandémie de COVID-19 a-t-elle exacerbé (ou atténué) les écarts quant à l’emploi et aux salaires entre personnes issues de l’immigration récente et personnes non immigrantes ? » Nos résultats montrent que la pandémie n’a pas modifié le profil de participation au marché du travail des personnes immigrantes, qu’elles soient arrivées récemment ou depuis plus longtemps. La pandémie n’a pas non plus désavantagé de manière disproportionnée les personnes arrivées récemment quant aux salaires. En fait, les hommes récemment immigrés qui occupaient un emploi pendant la pandémie ont connu une bonification salariale, petite mais statistiquement significative. Cette hausse ne suffit pas, malheureusement, à compenser le déclassement salarial généralement associé au fait d’être une personne récemment immigrée. Nous montrons également que cette bonification salariale, attribuable à la COVID-19, des personnes issues de l’immigration récente ne s’observe qu’à partir de la médiane et vers le bas dans la distribution des salaires. Nous employons la méthode de correction des biais de Heckman pour tenir compte des éléments non sélectionnés par le critère d’échantillonnage de l’emploi pendant la pandémie. Le fait que la COVID-19 n’a pas empiré les écarts de salaires pour les personnes récemment immigrées ne devrait pas occulter les écarts importants qui existaient avant la pandémie et qui continuent d’exister, avec ou sans crise sanitaire. The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has exposed and arguably intensified many existing inequalities. This analysis explores the relationship between recent immigrant earnings and the pandemic. Specifically, we attempt to empirically answer the question “Has the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated (or mitigated) recent immigrant-non-immigrant employment and wage gaps?” We find that the pandemic did not change the labour force activity profile of recent or long-term immigrants. Moreover, the pandemic did not disproportionately disadvantage recent immigrants’ earnings. In fact, recent immigrant men who were employed during the COVID-19 crisis experienced a small but statistically significant earnings premium. This was insufficient, however, to overcome the overall earnings discount associated with being a recent immigrant. In addition, we find that the recent immigrant COVID-19 earnings boost is observable only at and below the median of the earnings distribution. We also use Heckman selection correction to attempt to adjust for unobserved sample selection into employment during the pandemic. The fact that COVID-19 has not worsened recent immigrant earnings gaps should not overshadow the large, recent immigrant earnings disparities that existed before the pandemic and continue to exist regardless of the COVID-19 crisis.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the effect of an increase in the relative supply of immigrants on natives’ task reallocation, with a focus on Germany. Specifically, it investigates whether natives, as a response to increased immigration, re-specialise in communication-intensive occupations, where they arguably have a comparative advantage due to language proficiency. Design/methodology/approach The analysis uses regional data from the German Labour Force Survey between 2002 and 2014. To derive data on job tasks requirements, it employs the US Department of Labor’s O*NET database, the results of which are tested through a sensitivity analysis using the European Working Condition Survey and the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies data sets. Findings The paper finds that indeed German workers respond to increasing immigration by shifting their task supply and providing more communication relative to manual tasks. Importantly, the decrease in the supply of communication tasks is stronger and more robust than the increase in the supply of manual tasks, pointing to a potential displacement effect taking place between natives and immigrants, alongside task reallocation. This would suggest that countries with relatively more rigid labour markets are less responsive to immigration shocks. Moreover, it suggests that labour market rigidity can minimise the gains from immigration and exacerbate employment effects. Originality/value The paper not only investigates task reallocation as a result of immigration in a different institutional context and labour market functioning, but the results feed into broader policy and scholarly discussions on the effects of immigration, including questions about how the institutional context affects labour market adjustment to immigration, worker occupational mobility in a more rigid labour markets and the fine balance needed between flexibility and rigidity.

Background Research on the relationship between medical tourism—traveling abroad for healthcare and cervical cancer screening is lacking. This study examines (1) the association between medical tourism and cervical cancer screening among immigrant women and (2) whether the association varies across years in the U.S. Methods We analyzed the New Immigrant Survey data of immigrant women aged 21–65 (n = 999). The outcome was having had a Pap smear since becoming a permanent resident, and the main predictor was medical tourism. Logistic regressions were conducted. Results Immigrant women who engaged in medical tourism had higher cervical cancer screening rates compared to those who did not engage in medical tourism (84.09% vs. 71.68%). This relationship was statistically significant only among women who have recently immigrated, after controlling for covariates. Conclusions Immigrant women who engaged in medical tourism had 2.18 higher odds of receiving a Pap smear than immigrant women who did not, after controlling for other covariates. Health educators should be aware of the practice of medical tourism and consider providing education on adherence to cancer screening guidelines and follow up abnormal results to ensure that immigrant women receive continuous cancer care.

Dans un rapport récent de l’Institut Fraser, Grady et Grubel (2015) concluent que les immigrants arrivés depuis peu au Canada, compte tenu du faible niveau d’impôts et de taxes qu’ils paient et des services gouvernementaux qu’ils reçoivent, représentent un fardeau fiscal important pour le Canada (5 329 $ par immigrant en 2010). La présente étude révèle toutefois que ce fardeau fiscal n’est important que dans le cas des réfugiés et des immigrants parrainés. Les immigrants économiques, pour leur part, paient en réalité davantage d’impôts et de taxes qu’ils ne reçoivent d’avantages. Il s’agit d’un constat d’importance, car les immigrants économiques sont sélectionnés avant tout pour des raisons économiques, alors que les réfugiés et les immigrants parrainés sont acceptés principalement pour des motifs humanitaires et par souci de compassion. In a recent report from the Fraser Institute, Grady and Grubel (2015) concluded that, because of the low taxes they pay and the government services they receive, the fiscal burden of recent immigrants to Canada was significant ($5,329 per immigrant in 2010). The present study, however, shows that the fiscal burden is significant only in the case of refugees and sponsored immigrants. By contrast, economic immigrants actually pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits. This is an important finding because economic immigrants are selected primarily on economic grounds, whereas refugees and sponsored immigrants are accepted primarily on humanitarian and compassionate grounds.

Sur la base des données de l’Enquête sur la population active du Canada, nous estimons l’effet différentiel de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur sept résultats sur le marché du travail, séparément pour les immigrants récents et établis par rapport aux Canadiens nés au pays. Nous utilisons également des régressions quantiles inconditionnelles de la fonction d’influence recentrée (RIF) pour estimer les effets différentiels sur la distribution des résultats. Nous constatons que la pandémie a eu un effet négatif sur les résultats du marché du travail pour tous les travailleurs, les effets négatifs étaient généralement plus importants pour les immigrants et en particulier les immigrants récents ainsi que pour les immigrants au bas de la distribution des résultats. Les effets néfastes étaient généralement plus importants pour les premières vagues de la pandémie et pour les immigrants récents qui étaient des femmes, moins instruits, ceux qui avaient des responsabilités envers les enfants et pour les emplois les plus à risque d’être en contact avec la pandémie. Based on Canadian Labour Force Survey data, we estimate the differential effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on seven labour market outcomes, and separate between recent and established immigrants relative to domestic-born Canadians. We also use Recentered Influence Function (RIF) unconditional quantile regressions to estimate the differential effects across the distribution of outcomes. We find that the pandemic had an adverse effect on the labour market outcomes for all workers, and that the adverse effects were generally larger for immigrants and especially recent immigrants as well as for immigrants at the bottom of the outcome distributions. The adverse effects were generally larger at the earliest waves of the pandemic, and for recent immigrants who were female, less educated, and those with child responsibilities, and for jobs at greater risk of contact with the pandemic.

This study determined the prevalence and clinical features of occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) in a population of recent immigrants to Italy. Two hundred-five immigrants were tested for HBV-infection and were classified as seropositive - OBI or false - OBI . Biochemical/virological activities and imaging diagnostics were determined in anti-HBc-positive subjects. Among the tested subjects, 39.0% were anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative; 11.2% had persistently normal ALT levels with mild detectable HBV-DNA, seropositive - OBI ; 6.2% had slightly elevated ALT and positive serum HBV-DNA with a mean level of viral load: 3275 copies/mL- false - OBI . The total prevalence of OBI was 6.8%; 4.4% were seropositive - OBI and 2.4% were false - OBI . Diagnosis by echo-tomography was achieved in 35.7% OBI subjects with alterations of the hepatic echo-texture. We found a moderate prevalence of occult hepatitis B-infection in immigrants. Frequently, these subjects present false-OBI.

Adequate, suitable and affordable housing is one of the basic needs that must be successfully attained in the process of immigrant integration into a community. This case study consisting of semi-structured interviews and focus groups with new immigrants and landlords centres particularly on the housing experiences of immigrants in North Bay, a small city in Northeast Ontario. North Bay, like many small urban centres in Canada, has undertaken an immigration strategy in order to counter demographic challenges and boost economic development. The housing experiences were examined in terms of suitability given household size and composition, affordability relative to the immigrants’ financial resources as well as ownership and dwelling type. The connection between the immigrant’s housing experiences, their interactions with neighbours and landlords and their perceptions of the city as a welcoming community were also explored. Generally, the immigrants who participated in the study were satisfied with their current housing situation. Several participants were surprised to find a limited and older housing stock in North Bay and rental prices that were not significantly different from the larger cities they had left. Their housing experiences tended to either have a positive impact on their perceptions of the city or not at all. Policy implications and recommendations are also discussed.

From its most cosmopolitan urban centers to the rural Midwest, the United States is experiencing a rising tide of religious interest. While terrorist attacks keep Americans fixed on an abhorrent vision of militant Islam, popular films such as The Passion of the Christ and The Da Vinci Code make blockbuster material of the origins of Christianity. The 2004 presidential election, we are told, was decided on the basis of religiously driven moral values. A majority of Americans are reported to believe that religious differences are the biggest obstacle to world peace.Beneath the superficial banter of the media and popular culture, however, are quieter conversations about what it means to be religious in America today-conversations among recent immigrants about how to adapt their practices to life in new land, conversations among young people who are finding new meaning in religions rejected by their parents, conversations among the religiously unaffiliated about eclectic new spiritualities encountered in magazines, book groups, or online. Interfaith Encounters in America takes a compelling look at these seldom acknowledged exchanges, showing how, despite their incompatibilities, Buddhist, Muslim, Christian, Jewish, and Hindu Americans, among others, are using their beliefs to commit to the values of a pluralistic society rather than to widen existing divisions.Chapters survey the intellectual exchanges among scholars of philosophy, religion, and theology about how to make sense of conflicting claims, as well as the relevance and applicability of these ideas \"on the ground\" where real people with different religious identities intentionally unite for shared purposes that range from national public policy initiatives to small town community interfaith groups, from couples negotiating interfaith marriages to those exploring religious issues with strangers in online interfaith discussion groups.Written in engaging and accessible prose, this book provides an important reassessment of the problems, values, and goals of contemporary religion in the United States. It is essential reading for scholars of religion, sociology, and American studies, as well as anyone who is concerned with the purported impossibility of religious pluralism.

Korean immigrants in the United States (U.S.) are known for their preference for, and dependence on, co-ethnic doctors due to various barriers to the U.S. healthcare system. Recent immigrants tend to face more barriers than their non-recent counterparts. However, there is little information on how they find their doctors in the U.S. This study includes a self-administrated survey of Korean immigrants aged 18 and above who lived in the New York–New Jersey Metropolitan area in 2013–2014 (n = 440). Descriptive analysis was conducted to understand the most common information sources and the number of sources based on the duration of stay in the U.S. More recent Korean immigrants were female, had no family doctor, uninsured, younger, and more educated than their non-recent counterparts. Regardless of the duration of stay in the U.S., family members and friends were the most frequently sought-after sources for Korean immigrants in their search for doctors. In addition to family members and friends, non-recent Korean immigrants also used other methods (e.g., Korean business directories), whereas recent immigrants used both U.S. and Korean websites. More recent Korean immigrants used multiple sources compared to non-recent Korean immigrants, often combined with a Korean website. Our study suggests policy implications to improve recent immigrants’ accessibility to health information in a timely manner.