Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Country Of Publication
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Target Audience
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
434,277 result(s) for "reconciliation"
Sort by:
McConnell says chips bill negotiations are ‘stuck’
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on July 12 reiterated that Senate Republicans would tank a semiconductor bill if Democrats pursued a separate spending package.
Post-Conflict Affiliative Behaviors Towards Humans in Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris)
Social species need conflict-resolution mechanisms to maintain group cohesion and diminish aggression. Reconciliation (affiliative contact between opponents) and consolation (affiliative contact between the victim and an uninvolved third party) have been postulated for this function in various species. The purpose of this work is to study post-conflict affiliative behaviors toward humans in domestic dogs. This study has looked into post-conflict affiliative behaviors in domestic dogs toward their owners. To this end, a conflict situation was created where the animal was scolded by one of the owners for “stealing” human food. Behaviors were recorded along a period of 3 min and 30 s before and after the scolding. Results show that dogs exhibit affiliative behaviors (significant increase in closeness, gazing, and tail wagging) as well as appeasement behaviors (averting eyes, low tail carriage, lowered ears, lip licking, and crouching) toward the owner that scolded them (reconciliation). In other words, this is the first work that presents reconciliation in dogs in a conflict situation with humans. It discusses the importance of this phenomenon in the dog-human bond.
Schumer: Fully paid for reconciliation package ‘on the table’
Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) on July 13 signaled that an infrastructure reconciliation package could be fully paid for to gain the support of moderate Democrats.
PS-023 Types, causes and potential seriousness of medicines errors intercepted by medicines reconciliation in a general hospital
BackgroundAs part of the WHO’s High 5s project, the Standard Operating Protocol “Medicines Reconciliation” has been used in our hospital centre since 2010. Medicines reconciliation at the time of admission detects medicines errors (ME), called unintended discrepancies (UDs). These MEs are particularly worthy of attention because they are not detected by the computerised physician order entry system (CPOES).PurposeTo analyse the type and the potential seriousness of MEs, to identify the cause of the loss of information and to determine the ATC groups of the drugs most involved.Material and methodsProspective observational and interventional study.From July to September 2014In patients older than 65 years of age hospitalised in short stay units after admission through the Emergency Department:Within 48 h of admission, patients’ regularly used medicines are compared with computerised prescriptions at admission.Every UD identified is corrected at reconciliation, and recorded in an Excel file.Results191 lines of UDs were identified among 532 reconciled patients (30% from eligible patients):Type of ME: omission (70%), incorrect dose (20%)Potential seriousness: minor (32%), significant (48%), major+ (20%)Identified cause: inattention (60%), regular prescriptions non-available (26%), resumption of an old prescription (7%)Most involved ATC groups: C (35%) particularly subgroups C09 (30%) and C10 (30%).ConclusionMost MEs are omissions, and information is most frequently lost due to inattention; this is easily corrected by reconciliation. Almost half of MEs might have significant consequences for patients if not rectified. Concerning errors in the C09 subgroup, we must improve the equivalence database of our CPOES.Working within a multidisciplinary team in hospitalisation units, the pharmacist contributes to increasing patient safety. Medicines reconciliation is a time-consuming activity; to keep it steady in our hospital after the end of the WHO project and to be exhaustive, we have to identify which patients are the most important to reconcile.References and/or acknowledgementsNo conflict of interest.
A moral theory of political reconciliation
\"Following extended periods of conflict or repression, political reconciliation is indispensable to the establishment or restoration of democratic relationships and critical to the pursuit of peacemaking globally. In this important new book, Colleen Murphy offers an innovative analysis of the moral problems plaguing political relationships under the strain of civil conflict and repression. Focusing on the unique moral damage that attends the deterioration of political relationships, Murphy identifies the precise kinds of repair and transformation that processes of political reconciliation ought to promote. Building on this analysis, she proposes a normative model of political relationships. A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation delivers an original account of the failure and restoration of political relationships, which will be of interest to philosophers, social scientists, legal scholars, policy analysts, and all those who are interested in transitional justice, global politics, and democracy\"-- Provided by publisher.