Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
Content TypeContent Type
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
163,951
result(s) for
"research process"
Sort by:
La investigación formativa: una experiencia del cuerpo académico estudios en educación
This work is the outcome of a research developed in collaboration with the Academic Group “Estudios en Educación” based on interviews conducted to students and members of the same Academic Group. The purpose for these interviews was resuming, reconstructing and reflecting on their experiences in the implication of the strategy “Formative Research” and the impact that this exercise has had in the professional training of students as possible future researchers, as well as in the improvements in the professional training of researchers regarding the student's knowledge and their contributions in an exercise of “Everyone learn from everyone”. This is considered as emerging research experiences show that different groups are taking towards these experiences and disseminate them as references for reproduction, adaptation or exclusion according to the needs and circumstances of those involved in the investigation.
Journal Article
Estrategia didáctica para la enseñanza y aprendizaje en el laboratorio de circuitos eléctricos de la universidad de la costa cuc
by
Ebaldo Pérez-Villareal
,
Sandra Lora-Castro
,
Carlos Peña-Arrieta
in
research; process; research; formation
2015
This work is the outcome of a research developed in collaboration with the Academic Group “Estudios en Educación” based on interviews conducted to students and members of the same Academic Group. The purpose for these interviews was resuming, reconstructing and reflecting on their experiences in the implication of the strategy “Formative Research” and the impact that this exercise has had in the professional training of students as possible future researchers, as well as in the improvements in the professional training of researchers regarding the student's knowledge and their contributions in an exercise of “Everyone learn from everyone”. This is considered as emerging research experiences show that different groups are taking towards these experiences and disseminate them as references for reproduction, adaptation or exclusion according to the needs and circumstances of those involved in the investigation.
Journal Article
The Continuum of Community Engagement in Research: A Roadmap for Understanding and Assessing Progress
by
Furr-Holden, Debra
,
Zimmerman, Marc A
,
Johnson-Lawrence, Vicki
in
Adaptation
,
Citizen participation
,
Collaboration
2019
The past two decades have been marked by increased community involvement in the research process. Community-engaged research (CEnR) is increasingly promoted in the literature, and academic programs with a community-academic partnership focus. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an approach to frame equitable community involvement in research and is a critical component of the CEnR continuum. As with CEnR, noted benefits of using CBPR expressed in the literature, which include enhancing the relevance and application of the research data, expertise to complex problems at all stages of research, overcoming community distrust, and improving community health. This article presents a community engagement (CE) model that includes seven defined designations for CEnR. In addition, this model includes equity indicators and contextual factors for consideration at the various levels of engagement along the continuum.
The CE model described in this article combines the principles of CE and CBPR in conjunction with a continuum model. The continuum integrates a focus on health equity and contextual factors providing perspectives from both community and academic partners at each point of engagement.
A broadly defined CEnR continuum will allow researchers, community members and organizations to readily identify 1) where they are on the continuum of CEnR, 2) appropriate access points to enter the continuum based on existing contextual factors, and 3) actions to promote progression on the continuum. Funders have the opportunity to specify the appropriate level of CE needed to accomplish the goals of their identified priorities.
Journal Article
Translational Research: An Oral Historical Timeline from Architecture and Cinema to Migration
2020
This article is about the in-between state that researchers may find themselves in if/when they move from one area of research to another. It is a chronological oral history, an academic diary if you like, of such a time period experienced by an architect who moved from film studies toward migration studies as well as a recent aftermath of this translational research. Via revisiting the researcher’s experiences, the article explores possible commonalities, especially for those who go into areas with a high degree of social consciousness. The study pursues which fragments of the old are translatable into the new and vice versa.
Journal Article
The application of theory in literature reviews – illustrated with examples from supply chain management
by
Yawar, Sadaat Ali
,
Sauer, Philipp C.
,
Seuring, Stefan
in
Boundary conditions
,
Circular economy
,
Data analysis
2021
PurposeLiterature review articles have become a frequently applied research approach in operations and supply chain management (SCM). The purpose of this paper aims to elaborate on four approaches for developing or employing theory in systematic literature reviews (SLRs).Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses conceptual arguments and illustrates them by pointing to recent examples. In SLRs, the material collection is usually based on keywords and searching databases, which is comparatively well documented. Data analysis, however, often falls short in documentation and, consequently, is neither well explained nor replicable. Therefore, the focus of this paper is the elaboration of the data analysis and sense-making stage in the research process of SLRs.FindingsThe paper presents four different approaches, which are characterized as theory (1) building, (2) modification, (3) refinement and (4) extension, based on whether new concepts are formed or extant concepts within SCM or other fields of management theory are adopted.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation of this research is that literature reviews could be conducted and presented in many ways. Since the focus of this research is on systematic literature reviews, only a limited number of approaches can be discussed and presented here.Originality/valueThe paper contributes to explaining the process and expected outcomes of a literature review and, therefore, aids in further developing the related methodological approaches. This is relevant as literature review publications now often replace conceptual or theoretical pieces but still have to deliver concerning demands of theory building.
Journal Article
How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions
2023
Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have become a standard tool in many fields of management research but are often considerably less stringently presented than other pieces of research. The resulting lack of replicability of the research and conclusions has spurred a vital debate on the SLR process, but related guidance is scattered across a number of core references and is overly centered on the design and conduct of the SLR, while failing to guide researchers in crafting and presenting their findings in an impactful way. This paper offers an integrative review of the widely applied and most recent SLR guidelines in the management domain. The paper adopts a well-established six-step SLR process and refines it by sub-dividing the steps into 14 distinct decisions: (1) from the research question, via (2) characteristics of the primary studies, (3) to retrieving a sample of relevant literature, which is then (4) selected and (5) synthesized so that, finally (6), the results can be reported. Guided by these steps and decisions, prior SLR guidelines are critically reviewed, gaps are identified, and a synthesis is offered. This synthesis elaborates mainly on the gaps while pointing the reader toward the available guidelines. The paper thereby avoids reproducing existing guidance but critically enriches it. The 6 steps and 14 decisions provide methodological, theoretical, and practical guidelines along the SLR process, exemplifying them via best-practice examples and revealing their temporal sequence and main interrelations. The paper guides researchers in the process of designing, executing, and publishing a theory-based and impact-oriented SLR.
Journal Article
Composing qualitative process research
2021
Qualitative process research is becoming increasingly popular, yet authors often struggle with creating an effective write-up. Process articles must demonstrate a close-knit link between process data and process theory, and, at the same time, engage the reader. This requires trade-offs among options for composing the presentation of narratives, concepts, and theoretical process models. This essay distinguishes three compositional structures authors can use to write up their findings—inductive, conceptualized, and modelled. We discuss their key characteristics, pros and cons, and conditions for effective use and offer exemplars for inspiration.
Journal Article
Reconciling theory and context
by
Welch, Catherine
,
Plakoyiannaki, Emmanuella
,
Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, Eriikka
in
Business and Management
,
Business Strategy/Leadership
,
Case studies
2022
In our Decade Award-winning article from 2011 we argued that it is not possible to explain social phenomena without consideration of their contexts. However, a persistent assumption in international business (IB) is that theories should be context-free. This affects the methodological choices we make, favoring the inductive theory-building approach to theorizing from case studies. In 2011, we proposed an alternative – contextualized explanations – that in our view better utilizes the main strength of the case study: reconciling theory and context. In this Retrospective, we further develop our original argument that context is essential, and not a hindrance, to theorizing, as well as elaborate on how decontextualization impoverishes theoretical insights. In order to achieve contextualized explanation, we offer four alternatives: process research, historical research, the extended case method, and configurational theorizing. We argue that, for the IB field to take contextualization seriously, we need an open debate about what theory is and how we produce it. We hope this paper will broaden the scope of our discussion from the need for methodological pluralism to the need for theoretical pluralism, thereby setting a new agenda for future IB research.
Journal Article