Explore the vast range of titles available.

\"In this memoir, Christine Suggs explores a trip they took to Mexico to visit family, as Christine embraces and rebels against their heritage and finds a sense of belonging\"--Provided by publisher.

Background Young gay and bisexual men disproportionately experience depression, anxiety, and substance use problems and are among the highest risk group for HIV infection in the U.S. Diverse methods locate the source of these health disparities in young gay and bisexual men’s exposure to minority stress. In fact, minority stress, psychiatric morbidity, substance use, and HIV risk fuel each other, forming a synergistic threat to young gay and bisexual men’s health. Yet no known intervention addresses minority stress to improve mental health, substance use problems, or their joint impact on HIV risk in this population. This paper describes the design of a study to test the efficacy of such an intervention, called ESTEEM (Effective Skills to Empower Effective Men), a 10-session skills-building intervention designed to reduce young gay and bisexual men’s co-occurring health risks by addressing the underlying cognitive, affective, and behavioral pathways through which minority stress impairs health. Methods This study, funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, is a three-arm randomized controlled trial to examine (1) the efficacy of ESTEEM compared to community mental health treatment and HIV counseling and testing and (2) whether ESTEEM works through its hypothesized cognitive, affective, and behavioral minority stress processes. Our primary outcome, measured 8 months after baseline, is condomless anal sex in the absence of PrEP or known undetectable viral load of HIV+ primary partners. Secondary outcomes include depression, anxiety, substance use, sexual compulsivity, and PrEP uptake, also measured 8 months after baseline. Discussion Delivering specific stand-alone treatments for specific mental, behavioral, and sexual health problems represents the current state of evidence-based practice. However, dissemination and implementation of this one treatment-one problem approach has not been ideal. A single intervention that reduces young gay and bisexual men’s depression, anxiety, substance use, and HIV risk by reducing the common minority stress pathways across these problems would represent an efficient, cost-effective alternative to currently isolated approaches, and holds great promise for reducing sexual orientation health disparities among young men. Trial registration Registered October 10, 2016 to ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02929069 .

Sexual minority men with HIV are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and have been underrepresented in behavioral research and clinical trials. This study aims to explore perceptions of HIV-related comorbidities and assess the interest in and usability of a virtual environment for CVD prevention education in Black and Latinx sexual minority men with HIV. This is a 3-phase pilot behavioral randomized controlled trial. We report on formative phases 1 and 2 that informed virtual environment content and features using qualitative interviews, usability testing, and beta testing with a total of 25 individuals. In phase 1, a total of 15 participants completed interviews exploring HIV-related illnesses of concern that would be used to tailor the virtual environment. In phase 2, usability testing and beta testing were conducted with 10 participants to assess interest, features, and content. In phase 1, we found that CVD risk factors included high blood pressure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and diabetes. Cancer (prostate, colon, and others) was a common concern, as were mental health conditions. In phase 2, all participants completed the 12-item usability checklist with favorable feedback within 30 to 60 minutes. Beta-testing interviews suggested (1) mixed perceptions of health and HIV, (2) high risk for comorbid conditions, (3) virtual environment features were promising, and (4) the need for diverse avatar representations. We identified several comorbid conditions of concern, and findings carry significant implications for mitigating barriers to preventive health screenings, given the shared risk factors between HIV and related comorbidities. Highly rated aspects of the virtual environment were anonymity; meeting others with HIV who identify as gay or bisexual; validating lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and others (LGBTQ+) images and content; and accessibility to CVD prevention education. Critical end-user feedback from beta testing suggested more options for avatar customization in skin, hair, and body representation. Our next phase will test the virtual environment as a new approach to advancing cardiovascular health equity in ethnic and racial sexual minority men with HIV. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04061915; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05242952. RR2-10.2196/38348.

•Research on nationally implemented HPV vaccination programmes for gbMSM is limited.•A range of socio-demographic factors predicted HPV vaccination in gbMSM.•Health-care provider recommendation was a very strong predictor of vaccination.•A norm-based intervention for gbMSM did not affect HPV vaccination intentions. This study tested social cognitive predictors of vaccination and a dynamic norms intervention for increasing HPV vaccination intentions in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM). The study employed an experiment embedded in a cross-sectional survey. Participants (N = 217; gbMSM aged 18–45 in Ireland) provided cross-sectional data on sociodemographic constructs and constructs from the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Health Belief Model. Unvaccinated participants (n = 94) were randomised to one of three experimental conditions (no norms, static norms, dynamic norms) and presented with information on HPV vaccine uptake in gbMSM in Ireland before reporting vaccination intentions. In an adjusted logistic regression, significant predictors of vaccination included being in a relationship (OR = 8.69 [1.09, 38.91]), perceived susceptibility (OR = 1.11 [1.04, 1.19]), healthcare provider recommendation (OR = 107.24 [26.87, 427.99]), and perceived barriers (OR = 0.83 [.7, 0.98]). Adjusted linear regression models showed no significant differences in HPV vaccination intentions between no norms and static norms (B = −1.24 [−4.6, 2.12]), dynamic norms and static norms (B = −0.62 [−3.86, 2.63]), and dynamic norms and no norms (B = 0.62 [−2.74, 3.98]). Connectedness to the LGBT+ community did not moderate these differences. The need for greater awareness of susceptibility, the impact of barriers, and the strong influence of a recommendation from a healthcare provider in predicting HPV vaccination among gbMSM are critical considerations for policymakers. Dynamic norm messaging may be less effective for vaccination than other behaviours more easily influenced by social norms. Efforts to implement dynamic norm-based interventions in gbMSM should consider the limited evidence of efficacy.

The population-level reductions in HIV incidence attributed to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have not been fully realized among sexual, gender, and racial/ethnic minority youth. P3 (Prepared, Protected, emPowered) is a comprehensive mobile application (app) intervention developed to support PrEP adherence through gamification, medication tracking, and social engagement. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 246 young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and young transgender women who have sex with men (YTWMSM) currently on or planning to begin PrEP. Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to: standard of care (SOC), P3 app (P3), or P3 app plus in-app adherence coaching (P3+). Adherence was measured at 3- and 6- months post enrollment by emtricitabine-triphosphate (FTC-TP) and tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) levels in dried blood spots consistent with PrEP use > 4 days/week. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion adherent comparing P3/P3+ to SOC. P3/P3+ was associated with a higher proportion adherent compared to SOC for both outcome measures. At 3 months, the estimated increase in the proportion adherent was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.27, p: 0.05) and 0.12 (95% CI: -0.03, 0.26, p: 0.11) for TFV-DP and FTC-TP, respectively. Estimated adherence was higher, but not statistically different, in P3+ compared to P3, for both TFV-DP and FTC-TP. Receipt of P3 (P3 or P3+) is associated with an increase in PrEP adherence among YMSM and YTWSM at 3 months. Additional analyses to discern the role of app usage and sociodemographic and behavioral factors on intervention effects are warranted.

Sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) are vulnerable to acquiring HIV and need HIV prevention and health services, but may have competing needs. A prior analysis found that PrEP use reports increased in a combination intervention study arm with coaching, peer support, and automated text-messages. This paper examines ancillary support and healthcare services utilization as secondary intervention objectives. SGMY (N = 895, 40% Black, 29% Latino) in Los Angeles and New Orleans were recruited from May, 2017 to August, 2019 and randomized to four intervention conditions: (a) automated text-messaging and monitoring intervention (AMMI), (b) AMMI plus peer support online (AMMI+PS), (c) AMMI plus strengths-based coaching by near-peer paraprofessionals (AMMI+C), or (d) all three (AMMI+PS+C). Intent-to-treat multivariate regression analyses evaluated the interventions’ efficacy on past 4-month reports of ancillary support services use, having a regular healthcare provider, receiving care from doctor’s office or clinic and mental health specialists, and participation in mental health support groups and HIV prevention programs. Ancillary services utilization reports declined from 40% of youth reporting an average of 4.4 services at baseline to 22.6% reporting 2.5 services by 24 months. Food, housing, transportation, and other basic services were utilized most frequently. Youth in the two coaching interventions maintained higher reports of services use over time compared to AMMI-only (both OR 1.23, 95%CI 1.12–1.35) and to AMMI+PS (both OR 1.20 95%CI 1.08–1.33). Our coaching intervention may support SGMY to stay engaged in support services. Results may be limited by self-report biases. It is unclear if these services are related to better long-term outcomes.

ObjectivesMen who have sex with men (MSM) are at increased risk for STIs and mental disorders. Syndemic theory holds that psychosocial issues co-occur and interact, and thus increase sexual risk behaviour. Psychosocial issue identification, referral and management might reduce risk behaviour.MethodsIn the syndemic-based intervention study, an open-label randomised controlled trial, MSM were enrolled at the STI outpatient clinic of the Public Health Service of Amsterdam. We screened participants using validated questionnaires on the following problem domains: alcohol and substance use, sexual compulsivity, anxiety, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, alexithymia, intimate partner violence and childhood sexual abuse. Individuals were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either tailored, face-to-face feedback and help-seeking advice on mental health screening, or no feedback and no help-seeking advice. Participants were followed trimonthly for a year. The primary outcomes were self-reported and confirmed help-seeking behaviour.ResultsWe included 155 MSM: 76 in the intervention group and 79 in the control group. At inclusion, 128 participants (83.1%) scored positive in at least one problem domain. We found no significant differences in self-reported or confirmed help-seeking behaviour between the intervention and the control group: 41% vs 29% (p=0.14) and 28% vs 22% (p=0.44), respectively. There were also no differences in STI incidence and condomless anal sex acts between the two groups.ConclusionScreening showed high prevalence of problems related to mental health and substance use, while tailored feedback, advice and referral did not significantly increase help-seeking behaviour. Other interventions are needed to tackle the high burden of mental disorders among MSM.Trial registration number NCT02859935.

Background Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) experience among the largest mental health disparities of any population. One driver has been the lack of evidence-based practices (EBPs) addressing the distinct mechanisms underlying SGM’s risk. LGBTQ-affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is among the only EBPs specifically for SGM mental health. LGBTQ community centers represent an ideal implementation setting for LGBTQ-affirmative CBT given their wide reach. Although direct training of mental health providers at LGBTQ community centers by experts has been shown to improve providers’ LGBTQ-affirmative CBT skills, it is unclear how such training should be optimally delivered. This paper describes the protocol of a trial that seeks to compare the effectiveness of three training strategies for implementing LGBTQ-affirmative CBT, identify center-level moderators of implementation success, and examine the impact of the three strategies on client mental health through theory-informed organizational and provider mechanisms. Methods This hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial will randomize 90 centers to receive one of three additive strategies for implementing LGBTQ-affirmative CBT: [ 1 ] a suite of self-paced digital learning materials (Materials Only condition); [ 2 ] these materials plus weekly live webinar training for 12 weeks (Direct Training condition); or [ 3 ] the above plus one year of supervision from a local supervisor who will receive expert consultation in a train-the-trainer format (Local Supervision condition). The primary outcome will be provider fidelity assessed via simulated practice. Implementation determinants (e.g., center resources, provider/client characteristics), mediators (e.g., implementation climate, provider self-efficacy), and other outcomes (e.g., intervention adaptation, sustainment) will be captured using a mixed-methods design. Clinical effectiveness outcomes (i.e., client mental and behavioral health symptoms) will be assessed through client surveys among a subset of 15 centers. Discussion Now that LGBTQ-affirmative CBT has shown efficacy across several trials and generated high demand, research is needed to determine nationwide implementation strategies. This study will identify optimal means through which to implement this treatment innovation in the US’s large network of LGBTQ community centers, thereby producing generalizable guidance for EBP implementation across low-resource settings nationwide in which mental health disparities populations are likely to seek treatment. Trial registration NCT05890404 (05/25/2023), https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05890404 .

Black Americans are disproportionately impacted by HIV. This disparity is more profound in the Southern United States, with the highest rates being among young, Black, sexual minority men, who are also less likely to receive state-of-the-art interventions such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Individual-level interventions to increase PrEP uptake do not often capitalize on the opportunity to leverage the significant effects of this group's social networks, including Black women, on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors around HIV prevention. To increase PrEP use, an intervention, PrEP US NoW, was designed to engage young, Black, sexual minority men's social networks in discussions with supportive Black female facilitators and ultimately enhance their social capital. First, qualitative information on core health-promoting elements of social capital bonds was captured among young, Black, sexual minority men and Black women in extant social support networks. This information was then applied to adapt an existing, evidence-based mobile health app to create the PrEP US NoW pilot through an unblinded randomized controlled trial. Six social network groups (5 young, Black, sexual minority men + 1 Black woman) will participate in the intervention arm. These will be recruited through a network-based approach and will undergo tailored training (mobile-based and face-to-face) for app usage. At baseline, men will undergo HIV testing and both men and women will complete a sociodemographic survey. The groups in the intervention arm will engage in four 60-minute discussions led by Black women through the modified mobile health app. After the intervention, young, Black, sexual minority men will complete surveys electronically at 1 and 3 months (accompanied by HIV testing) on additional factors such as experiences of discrimination and PrEP stigma. The Black women will complete an electronic survey at 1 month, measuring feasibility and acceptability, and will participate in web-based qualitative interviews at 3 months to gain more knowledge on the PrEP US NoW facilitation process. Participants in the control arm will not engage in Black women-facilitated group discussions and will use a control version of the app. The baseline and follow-up surveys and HIV testing will be documented similarly to the intervention arm. Phase 1 (development) of PrEP US NoW research activities lasted from November 2019 to June 2024. Data collection for the phase 2 randomized controlled trial began in August 2024 and is expected to be completed in December 2025. The findings will capture the intervention's feasibility and acceptability and changes in PrEP uptake among young, Black, sexual minority men. The development and pilot implementation trial of the PrEP US NoW intervention is thought to leverage essential social capital among young, Black, sexual minority men, which may promote engagement in PrEP care, thus decreasing the overall number of HIV diagnoses. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07024745; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07024745. DERR1-10.2196/66326.

Background As Generation Z two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/trans, queer, intersex, asexual and others who identify as part of sexual and gender diverse communities (2SLGBTQIA +) enter adulthood, contemplation of family creation may be challenged by biological and/or social infertility. Despite some advances in societal acceptance of gender and sexual minorities, family planning and reproductive healthcare remain heteronormative. To explore reproductive decision-making and how future families are conceptualized across genders, we evaluated perceptions of Ontario, Canada non-parenting, 2SLGBTQIA + emerging adults. Methods An online survey, designed as mixed-methods with sex-and-gender-based analysis (SGBA +), was used to recruit childless, post-secondary students, aged 18–30 years, in May–October 2022. Survey questions were analyzed by descriptive statistics across gender groups. Open-text responses were analyzed by thematic and content analysis. Results Parenthood intentions, conceptualizations of future family and perceptions of ART were described by 286 2SLGBTQIA + individuals, who were primarily Caucasian, cis women (69.2%), identified as bisexual-pansexual (66.4%), and belonged to Generation Z (85%). Only 33.9% of the sample definitively wanted children, with 33.6% unsure, and 32.5% preferring to remain childless. Themes describing participants’ future family visions included: (i) committed partners are family, (ii) family includes children (subtheme: adoption/fostering as options for family creation), (iii) family values include love and acceptance, (iv) chosen families, and (v) families can be childfree. ART was acceptable in the event of future infertility, with two major themes used to describe perceived barriers to ART: (i) treatment is expensive; and (ii) I may face discrimination due to my gender identity/sexual orientation. Trans men were significantly more worried about healthcare access to have a biological child (86.7%; χ 2 (3):16.805 p < .001) than other genders. Conclusions 2SLGBTQIA + respondents expanded the rigid, heteronormative nuclear family model to envision families comprised of partners, biological and adoptive/foster children, friends and chosen family. Participants across genders recognized systemic 2SLGBTQIA + discrimination, with transgender/trans respondents particularly concerned about barriers to reproductive healthcare. A better understanding of reproductive decision-making by 2SLGBTQIA + individuals can contribute to more equitable and inclusive ART healthcare.