Explore the vast range of titles available.

To investigate the hardness and energy absorption of four commercially available chairside types of silicone materials and compare their properties with heat-cured silicone material. The chairside materials investigated were GC reline soft, mucopren soft, sofreliner soft and elite soft relining. The heat-cured polymer silicone material was Molloplast B. All soft lining materials were processed according to manufacturers' instructions. Two properties were investigated. Ten specimens for each test were prepared for each soft liner except for the water absorption and solubility test, for which only five specimens were prepared. The specimens of energy absorption (10 × 10 × 3 mm) were tested using a Lloyd instruments testing machine. Hardness specimens (38 × 38 × 3) were tested using a shore A durometer and were divided into two subgroups; dry and wet storage. The specimens of energy absorption (10 × 10 × 3 mm) were tested using a Lloyd instruments testing machine. Sofreliner soft was significantly softer than Molloplast B. GC reline soft was significantly harder than molloplast B. At high loads, sofreliner soft and elite soft relining was significantly more resilient than molloplast B. Mucopren soft was significantly stiffer than Molloplast B. At low loads, all materials showed similarities in stiffness and resilience; the difference between them was insignificant. After one month of immersion, GC reline and mucopren significantly increased hardness values. In all conditions and at all four-time points, the hardness values for GC Reline soft were the greatest, and hardness values for Sofreliner Soft were the least. Some chairside soft denture lining materials could have similar significant properties to molloplast-B, such as sofreliner soft and elite.

Abrasions and pressure ulcers on the oral mucosa are most often caused by excessive pressure or incorrect fitting of the denture. The use of soft relining materials can eliminate pain sensations and improve patient comfort. The main functional feature of soft elastomeric materials is the ability to discharge loads from the tissues of the mucosa. (1) Background: The aim of the work was a comparative laboratory study of ten materials used for the soft lining of acrylic dentures. (2) Methods: There were materials based on acrylates (Vertex Soft, Villacryl Soft, Flexacryl Soft) and silicones (Sofreliner Tough Medium, Sofreliner Tough Medium, Ufi Gel SC, GC Reline Soft, Elite Soft Relining, Molloplast). Laboratory tests include the analysis of the tensile bond strength between the relining material and the acrylic plate of the prosthesis. The tests were conducted taking into account 90-day term aging in the distilled water environment based on the methodology presented in the European Standard ISO 10139-2. (3) Results: After three months of observation, the highest strength of the joint was characterized by Flexacryl Soft acrylic, for which the average value was 2.5 MPa. The lowest average value of 0.89 MPa was recorded for the GC Reline Soft silicone material. Over time, an increase in the value of the strength of the combination of acrylic materials and a decrease in these values in the case of silicone materials was observed. (4) Conclusion: Each of the tested silicone materials showed all three types of damage, from adhesive to mixed to cohesive. All acrylic-based materials showed an adhesive type of failure. Time did not affect the type of destruction.

The main functional feature of elastomeric soft linings materials is the ability to discharge loads in the tissues of the mucosa. As a result, there are fewer injuries to the mucosa and chewing ability increases. In addition, these prostheses are more comfortable in the patient’s opinion. To obtain the equal distribution of forces on the muco-bone basis and to reduce the traumatizing effect of the denture plate for patients using full dentures, soft lining materials can be used. Aim of the study: the aim of the work was a comparative laboratory study of ten materials used for soft lining of acrylic complete dentures. Methodology: Materials based on acrylates (Vertex Soft, Villacryl Soft, Flexacryl Soft) and on silicones (Sofreliner Tough Medium, Sofreliner Tough Medium, Ufi Gel SC, GC Reline Soft, Elite Soft Relining, Molloplast) were compared. Laboratory tests include tests of changes in Shore’a A hardness of soft lining material. The tests were conducted taking into account 90 day term aging in the distilled water environment based on the methodology presented in the European Standard ISO 10139-2. Results: For most silicone materials, only small changes in hardness were found in the range of 0.7 (Ufi Gel SC) to 3.3 (Sofreliner Tough Medium) on the Shore A scale. The exception was GC Reline Soft, for which a marked increase in hardness was noted. All materials based on acrylates were characterized by successive increase in hardness over time. However, in the case of the Vertex Soft material, the increase in hardness was relatively small (5.5 ShA).

Colonization of temporary denture soft linings and underlying tissues by yeast-like fungi is an important clinical problem due to the negative influence on the process of prosthetic treatment. Typical hygienic procedures are often insufficient to prevent fungal infections, so in this study, an antimicrobial filler (silver sodium hydrogen zirconium phosphate) was introduced into acrylic soft liner at concentrations of 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10% (w/w). The effect of this modification on antifungal properties against Candida albicans, cytotoxicity, Shore A hardness, tensile strength and tensile bond strength, sorption and solubility was investigated, considering the recommended 30-day period of temporary soft lining use. The most favorable compilation of properties was obtained at a 1 to 6% filler content, for which nearly a total reduction in Candida albicans was registered even after 30 days of sample storing. The tensile and bond strength of these composites was at the desired and stable level and did not differ from the results for the control material. Hardness increased with the increasing concentration in filler but were within the range typical for soft lining materials and their changes during the experiment were similar to the control material. The materials were not cytotoxic and sorption and solubility levels were stable.

Background: In patients undergoing surgery for oral cancer, soft support materials are used to minimise trauma to the soft tissues. Silicone-based liners are widely used in prosthetic dentistry. A prerequisite for long-term Adhesion of the liner to the denture base is largely dependent on the surface preparation of the denture material. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether surface preparation of the acrylic material by sandblasting increases the adhesion of the silicone support material to the acrylic denture plate. Material and Methods: The study included adhesion testing of four silicone-based soft cushioning materials (Silagum Comfort, Elite Soft Re-lining, Ufi Gel SC, Mucopren Soft) on a total of 270 samples. Each material was tested on 15 samples. Three subgroups with different surfaces were separated: 1 raw—standard surface treatment with a cutter, and 2 sandblasted, with 100 and 350 µm alumina grain at 90°. The samples were subjected to seasoning: 24 h and six weeks. The adhesion force of silicone to acrylic was measured by performing a tensile test using a universal two-column testing machine. Results: The highest bond strength was recorded for Silagum on the surface prepared using 100 µm abrasive and seasoned for 6 weeks (291.5 N). The smallest among the maximum forces was recorded for the Mucopren material (81.1 N). For the Mucopren system with a raw and sand-blasted surface (350 µm), the adhesion strength increased after six weeks. In contrast, the durability of the joint decreased for the 100 µm sandblasted surface. The Elite material exhibited similar values for maximum forces (271.8 N) and minimum forces (21.1 N). The highest strength (226.1 N) was recorded for the sample from the group prepared with 350 µm abrasive and seasoned for 24 h. The lowest value (72.6 N) occurred for the sample from the group with 100 µm abrasive and seasoned for 6 weeks. Conclusions: Sandblasting of acrylic plastic improves adhesion to selected relining silicones. 2. The size of the abrasive employed has an impact on the adhesion between the acrylic plastic and the bedding silicone. 3. In the case of some relining systems (Mucopren), an increase in roughness through sandblasting has the effect of reducing the durability of the bonded joint.

Purpose The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the changes the rheological properties of some soft lining materials, to compare the rheological properties and viscoelastic behaviour at different temperatures. Materials and methods Five soft lining materials (acrylic and silicone based) were used. the storage modulus (G’), loss modulus (G”), tan delta (tan δ) and complex viscosity (η’) were chosen and for each material, measurements were repeated at 23, 33 and 37  °C, using an oscillating rheometer. All data were statistically analyzed using the Mann Whitney U test, Kruskal Wallis test and Conover’s Multiple Comparison test at the significance level of 0.05. Results Soft lining materials had different viscoelastic properties and most of the materials showed different rheological behavior at 23, 33 and 37  °C. At the end of the test (t¹5), at all the temperatures, Sofreliner Tough M had the highest storage modulus values while Visco Gel had the highest loss Tan delta values. Conclusions There were significant changes in the rheological parameters of all the materials. Also temperature affected the initial rheological properties, and polymerization reaction of all the materials, depending on temperature increase. Clinical implications Temperature affected the initial rheological properties, and polymerization reaction of soft denture liner materials, and clinical inferences should be drawn from such studies conducted. It can be recommended to utilize viscoelastic acrylic-based temporary soft lining materials with lower storage modulus, higher tan delta value, and high viscosity in situations where pain complaint persists and tissue stress is extremely significant, provided that they are replaced often.

While functioning in the oral cavity, denture soft linings (SL) are exposed to contact with the microbiota. Dentures can offer perfect conditions for the multiplication of pathogenic yeast-like fungi, resulting in rapid colonisation of the surface of the materials used. In vitro experiments have also shown that yeast may penetrate SL. This may lead to changes in their initially beneficial functional properties. The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of three months of exposure to a Candida albicans suspension on the mechanical properties of SL material and its bond strength to the denture base polymer, and to additionally verify previous reports of penetration using a different methodology. Specimens of the SL material used were incubated for 30, 60 and 90 days in a suspension of Candida albicans strain (ATCC 10231). Their shore A hardness, tensile strength, and bond strength to acrylic resin were tested. The colonization of the surface and penetration on fractured specimens were analysed with scanning electron and inverted fluorescence microscopes. Exposure to yeast did not affect the mechanical properties. The surfaces of the samples were colonised, especially in crystallized structures of the medium; however, the penetration of hyphae and blastospores into the material was not observed.

Integrating soft components into denture design may significantly enhance the comfort of edentulous patients. Microorganisms, particularly Candida albicans, often colonize soft denture lining materials, which can release metabolic and toxic byproducts linked to the development of Denture-Induced Stomatitis. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents incorporated into soft denture liners in inhibiting the adhesion and colonization of C. albicans. A systematic review was conducted through MEDLINE-Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A range of keywords was employed without applying a time filter to identify relevant literature. The review revealed many studies investigating various antimicrobial compounds added to different soft denture liner materials, all demonstrating the ability to inhibit the proliferation of C. albicans. All the antimicrobial agents examined exhibited a significant antifungal effect, with minimal to negligible impact on the physical properties of the denture liners. However, it was noted that the mechanical properties of the liners were modified in direct correlation to the concentration of the antimicrobial agents utilized. The successful incorporation of these agents into various soft denture liners has been documented, with nystatin being the primary pharmacological agent identified across multiple studies. While incorporating antibacterial agents was deemed successful, it is essential to note that the methodologies employed yielded varying effects on the overall performance of the soft-liner materials.

Background With the advent of additive manufacturing, 3D-printed materials have emerged as promising alternatives. 3D printing technology enables the single-step fabrication of both denture bases and soft liners, addressing a clinical gap by allowing the soft liner to be directly and patient-specifically integrated onto the denture base. However, their physical properties must be thoroughly evaluated before clinical implementation. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the color stability, surface roughness, and Shore A hardness of an experimental 3D-printed soft liner with two established materials: a short-term acrylic-based liner (GC) and a long-term silicone-based liner (UP). Methods This in vitro study compared the color stability, surface roughness, and Shore A hardness of an experimental 3D-printed soft liner with two conventional materials: GC (acrylic-based, short-term) and UP (silicone-based, long-term). Standardized specimens (n = 10 per group) were immersed in distilled water and coffee at 37 °C for 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Color change (ΔE₀₀) was measured using a spectrophotometer, surface roughness (Ra) with a profilometer, and hardness with a Shore A durometer. Data were analyzed using one-way and repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests ( p  < 0.05). Results The 3D-printed soft liner showed significantly higher Shore A hardness compared to both GC and UP materials across all time intervals. In terms of color stability, the 3D-printed material performed similarly to GC but was inferior to UP. Surface roughness analysis revealed that the 3D-printed liner was rougher than UP, which maintained the smoothest surface and greatest color stability overall throughout the testing period. Conclusions While the 3D-printed experimental soft liner demonstrated clinically acceptable physical properties, particularly in hardness, its increased surface roughness and moderate color stability suggest that further formulation improvements are needed. Enhancements in softness and smoothness would be necessary for the material to become a viable alternative to conventional soft liners in routine prosthodontic practice.

This review examines strategies to enhance the antifungal properties of commercial soft lining materials (SLMs) through modification with plant-derived oils, extracts, and powders. These natural bioactive compounds act via multiple mechanisms, including disruption of fungal cell membranes, inhibition of biofilm formation, and interference with Candida albicans metabolism, the pathogen causing denture-associated candidiasis. Their incorporation into SLM provides localized antifungal activity at the denture–mucosa interface. The review highlights Aloe vera (aloe), Azadirachta indica (neem), Ocimum basilicum (basil), Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree), Cocos nucifera (coconut), Allium sativum (garlic), Thymus vulgaris (thyme), and chitosan as notable sources of phytotherapeutics that consistently inhibit C. albicans growth. In addition to antimicrobial effects, studies assessed both intrinsic (hardness, tensile strength, tear strength) and interfacial (bond strength) mechanical properties, as well as surface roughness. Most formulations maintained acceptable mechanical performance and improved surface smoothness. Key limitations include rapid leaching of active compounds, variability in testing methods, and insufficient in vivo and cytotoxicity data. Future research should prioritize the high-quality purification of natural extracts, the isolation of well-defined bioactive compounds, and the design of systems enabling selective and sustained release of these agents, ensuring reproducibility, enhanced stability, and clinical reliability of next-generation bioactive SLMs.