Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
164 result(s) for "standardized test procedure"
Sort by:
Standardized Test Procedure for External Human–Machine Interfaces of Automated Vehicles
Research on external human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) has recently become a major area of interest in the field of human factors research on automated driving. The broad variety of methodological approaches renders the current state of research inconclusive and comparisons between interface designs impossible. To date, there are no standardized test procedures to evaluate and compare different design variants of eHMIs with each other and with interactions without eHMIs. This article presents a standardized test procedure that enables the effective usability evaluation of eHMI design solutions. First, the test procedure provides a methodological approach to deduce relevant use cases for the evaluation of an eHMI. In addition, we define specific usability requirements that must be fulfilled by an eHMI to be effective, efficient, and satisfying. To prove whether an eHMI meets the defined requirements, we have developed a test protocol for the empirical evaluation of an eHMI with a participant study. The article elucidates underlying considerations and details of the test protocol that serves as framework to measure the behavior and subjective evaluations of non-automated road users when interacting with automated vehicles in an experimental setting. The standardized test procedure provides a useful framework for researchers and practitioners.
Comparing User Acceptance in Human–Machine Interfaces Assessments of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Standardized Test Procedure
Human–Machine Interfaces (HMIs) in autonomous driving technology have recently gained significant research interest in public transportation. However, most of the studies are biased towards qualitative methods, while combining quantitative and qualitative approaches has yet to receive commensurate attention in measuring user acceptance of design outcome evaluation. To the best of our knowledge, no standardized test procedure that combines quantitative and qualitative methods has been formed to evaluate and compare the interrelationships between different designs of HMIs and their psychological effects on users. This paper proposes a practical and comprehensive protocol to guide assessments of user acceptance of HMI design solutions. We first defined user acceptance and analyzed the existing evaluation methods. Then, specific ergonomic factors and requirements that the designed output HMI should meet were identified. Based on this, we developed a protocol to evaluate a particular HMI solution from in- and out-of-vehicle perspectives. Our theoretical protocol combines objective and subjective measures to compare users’ behavior when interacting with Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) in a virtual experimental environment, especially in public transportation. Standardized testing procedures provide researchers and interaction designers with a practical framework and offer theoretical support for subsequent studies.
A systematic discrepancy between the short circuit current and the integrated quantum efficiency in perovskite solar cells
Halide perovskites solar cells are now approaching commercialisation. In this transition from academic research towards industrialisation, standardized testing protocols and reliable dissemination of performance metrics are crucial. In this study, we analyze data from over 16,000 publications in the Perovskite Database to investigate the assumed equality between the integrated external quantum efficiency and the short circuit current from JV measurements. We find a systematic discrepancy with the JV-values being on average 4% larger. This discrepancy persists across time, perovskite composition, and device architecture, indicating the need to explore new perovskite physics and update reporting protocols and assumptions in the field. Defining and revising best practices for accurate measurements and data reliability and quality checks is a continuous effort for the commercialization of perovskite solar cells. Here, the authors discuss the systematic discrepancy between the short circuit current and integrated quantum efficiency.
Review of consensus test methods in medical imaging and current practices in photoacoustic image quality assessment
Significance: Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is a powerful emerging technology with broad clinical applications, but consensus test methods are needed to standardize performance evaluation and accelerate translation. Aim: To review consensus image quality test methods for mature imaging modalities [ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), x-ray CT, and x-ray mammography], identify best practices in phantom design and testing procedures, and compare against current practices in PAI phantom testing. Approach: We reviewed scientific papers, international standards, clinical accreditation guidelines, and professional society recommendations describing medical image quality test methods. Observations are organized by image quality characteristics (IQCs), including spatial resolution, geometric accuracy, imaging depth, uniformity, sensitivity, low-contrast detectability, and artifacts. Results: Consensus documents typically prescribed phantom geometry and material property requirements, as well as specific data acquisition and analysis protocols to optimize test consistency and reproducibility. While these documents considered a wide array of IQCs, reported PAI phantom testing focused heavily on in-plane resolution, depth of visualization, and sensitivity. Understudied IQCs that merit further consideration include out-of-plane resolution, geometric accuracy, uniformity, low-contrast detectability, and co-registration accuracy. Conclusions: Available medical image quality standards provide a blueprint for establishing consensus best practices for photoacoustic image quality assessment and thus hastening PAI technology advancement, translation, and clinical adoption.
ELICITED IMITATION TASKS AS A MEASURE OF L2 PROFICIENCY
Elicited imitation tasks (EITs) have been proposed and examined as a practical measure of second language (L2) proficiency. This study aimed to provide an updated and comprehensive view of the relationship between EITs and other proficiency measures. Toward that end, 46 reports were retrieved contributing 60 independent effect sizes (Pearson’s r ) that were weighted and averaged. Several EIT features were also examined as potential moderators. The results portray EIT as a generally consistent measure of L2 proficiency ( r = .66). Among other moderators, EIT stimuli length was positively associated with stronger correlations. Overall, the findings provide support for the use of EITs as a means to greater consistency and practicality in measuring L2 proficiency. In our Discussion section, we highlight the need for more transparent reporting and provide empirically grounded recommendations for EIT design and for further research into EIT development.
Spanish adaptation of a cloze procedure to assess reading comprehension beyond the sentence level
The Hybrid Text Comprehension cloze (HyTeC-cloze) (Kleijn et al. Lang Test 36:553–572, 2019) is a procedure developed for the Dutch language that has been proved to be a valid and reliable measure of text comprehension beyond the sentence level. Given its advantages, including its relatively rapid construction and scoring and performance compared to standardized tests, we adapted the HyTeC-cloze procedure to create a version for the Spanish language. Therefore, this study aims at validating our adaptation. We extracted 18 texts from different school textbooks (Science, Language and History) and grades (6th, 7th, and 8th) and turned them into cloze tests, which were administered to 316 sixth to eighth graders from Chilean primary schools through an online platform. We also used a Chilean standardized reading comprehension test to evaluate the validity of our test. The correlations ranged from a low of 0.20 (for 7th grade) to a high of 0.58 (for 8th grade). Taken collectively, our data show a moderate positive correlation between both tests, which provide further evidence of cloze tests as a valid measure of reading comprehension beyond the sentence level.
Establishing standardized conditions for clinically available sound-localization tests: A multicenter approach
Sound localization is essential for auditory spatial awareness. The process relies on interaural differences in timing and level, and spectral cues. This study aimed to standardize sound-localization testing conditions across facilities in Japan, analyze the impact of early reflected sounds on localization accuracy, and compare outcomes between individuals with normal hearing and those with unilateral hearing loss. This study included 77 participants with normal hearing and 45 individuals with unilateral hearing loss, at 11 facilities. Sound-localization tests were conducted using nine loudspeakers arranged in a 180° horizontal arc. The stimuli consisted of Comité Consultatif International Téléphonique et Télégraphique (CCITT) and low-pass CCITT noise bursts at randomized levels of 50, 55, and 60 dB SPL. The reflected sound measurements employed time-stretched pulses to analyze early reflections (4–7 ms). The localization accuracy was assessed using the root-mean-square error and mean deviation score. Localization performance was negatively influenced by early reflections, with reflected sound envelope area and peak values within 4–7 ms correlating significantly with reduced accuracy (r = −0.535 to −0.555). Participants with normal hearing achieved a root-mean-square error of 2.0° ± 4.8°, whereas participants with unilateral hearing loss exhibited significantly greater errors (68.4° ± 40.7°, p < .001). Asymmetries in the left–right response accuracy correlated positively with the reflected sound characteristics (r > 0.6). Noise type (normal vs. low-pass CCITT) did not significantly impact performance in either group. Early reflections significantly compromise sound-localization accuracy, particularly in smaller testing environments where reflections overlap with direct sounds. Standardized testing protocols, in which early reflections are controlled, are critical for reliable assessments. The use of sound-absorbing materials can enhance the test precision, particularly in the clinical evaluation of unilateral hearing loss. These findings emphasize the need for optimizing acoustic conditions to improve the reliability and accuracy of sound-localization testing.
Tribocorrosion of Passive Materials: A Review on Test Procedures and Standards
This paper reviews the most recent available literature relating to the electrochemical techniques and test procedures employed to assess tribocorrosion behaviour of passive materials. Over the last few decades, interest in tribocorrosion studies has notably increased, and several electrochemical techniques have been adapted to be applied on tribocorrosion research. Until 2016, the only existing standard to study tribocorrosion and to determine the synergism between wear and corrosion was the ASTM G119. In 2016, the UNE 112086 standard was developed, based on a test protocol suggested by several authors to address the drawbacks of the ASTM G119 standard. Current knowledge on tribocorrosion has been acquired by combining different electrochemical techniques. This work compiles different test procedures and a combination of electrochemical techniques used by noteworthy researchers to assess tribocorrosion behaviour of passive materials. A brief insight is also provided into the electrochemical techniques and studies made by tribocorrosion researchers.
A Comparative Study of High Temperature Tensile and Creep Testing Between Standard and Miniature Specimens: Applicability and Limits
This study concerns the quasi-static and time-dependent mechanical behavior obtained via the miniaturized electro-thermal mechanical testing (ETMT) approach for single crystal (SX) and conventional cast Mar-M-247 superalloy. The experimental outcome was benchmarked against standardized testing procedures. It is found that tensile yielding behavior can be captured accurately by the ETMT approach up to 1100 ∘C, provided the appropriate type of thermocouple (T/C) is chosen. Furthermore, creep rupture behavior is underestimated by the miniaturized set-up. High repeatability of the rupture time was obtained for the SX case, whereas a significant scatter was observed for the conventional cast case. The discrepancies are assessed in detail; discussion centers around analytical and practical considerations, such as temperature uncertainty due to parasitic voltage and the choice of T/C, microstructural change as a result of the Joule heating, representative gauge volume, and strain rate non-linearity. Consequently, the applicability and limits of the miniaturized approach are examined critically, and improvements were suggested where appropriate.
Evaluation of a standardized test protocol to measure wheelchair-specific anaerobic and aerobic exercise capacity in healthy novices on an instrumented roller ergometer
This study aims to evaluate whether a test protocol with standardized and individualized resistance settings leads to valid wheelchair Wingate tests (WAnT) and graded exercise tests (GXT) in healthy novices. Twenty able-bodied individuals (10M/10F, age 23 ± 2 years, body mass 72 ± 11 kg) performed an isometric strength test, sprint test, WAnT and GXT on a wheelchair ergometer. Using a previously developed set of regression equations, individuals’ isometric strength outcome was used to estimate the WAnT result (P30 est ), from which an effective individual WAnT resistance was derived. The subsequently measured WAnT outcome (P30 meas ) was used to estimate the GXT outcome (POpeak est ) and to scale the individual GXT resistance steps. Estimated and measured outcomes were compared. The WAnT protocol was considered valid when maximal velocity did not exceed 3 m·s -1 ; the GXT protocol was considered valid when test duration was 8–12 min. P30 est did not significantly differ from P30 meas , while one participant did not have a valid WanT, as maximal velocity exceeded 3 m·s -1 . POpeak est was 10% higher than POpeak meas , and six participants did not reach a valid GXT: five participants had a test duration under 8 min and one participant over 12 min. The isometric strength test can be used to individually scale the WAnT protocol. The WAnT outcome scaled the protocol for the GXT less accurately, resulting in mostly shorter-than-desired test durations. In conclusion, the evaluated standardized and individualized test protocol was valid for the WAnT but less valid for the GXT among a group of novices. Before implementing the standardized individual test protocol on a broader scale, e.g. among paralympic athletes, it should be evaluated among different athletic wheelchair-dependent populations.