Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background One way to improve both the ecological performance and functionality of probiotic bacteria is by combining them with a prebiotic in the form of a synbiotic. However, the degree to which such synbiotic formulations improve probiotic strain functionality in humans has not been tested systematically. Our goal was to use a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm clinical trial in obese humans to compare the ecological and physiological impact of the prebiotic galactooligosaccharides (GOS) and the probiotic strains Bifidobacterium adolescentis IVS-1 (autochthonous and selected via in vivo selection) and Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 (commercial probiotic allochthonous to the human gut) when used on their own or as synbiotic combinations. After 3 weeks of consumption, strain-specific quantitative real-time PCR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed on fecal samples to assess changes in the microbiota. Intestinal permeability was determined by measuring sugar recovery in urine by GC after consumption of a sugar mixture. Serum-based endotoxin exposure was also assessed. Results IVS-1 reached significantly higher cell numbers in fecal samples than BB-12 ( P  < 0.01) and, remarkably, its administration induced an increase in total bifidobacteria that was comparable to that of GOS. Although GOS showed a clear bifidogenic effect on the resident gut microbiota, both probiotic strains showed only a non-significant trend of higher fecal cell numbers when administered with GOS. Post-aspirin sucralose:lactulose ratios were reduced in groups IVS-1 ( P  = 0.050), IVS-1 + GOS ( P  = 0.022), and GOS ( P  = 0.010), while sucralose excretion was reduced with BB-12 ( P  = 0.002) and GOS ( P  = 0.020), indicating improvements in colonic permeability but no synergistic effects. No changes in markers of endotoxemia were observed. Conclusion This study demonstrated that “autochthony” of the probiotic strain has a larger effect on ecological performance than the provision of a prebiotic substrate, likely due to competitive interactions with members of the resident microbiota. Although the synbiotic combinations tested in this study did not demonstrate functional synergism, our findings clearly showed that the pro- and prebiotic components by themselves improved markers of colonic permeability, providing a rational for their use in pathologies with an underlying leakiness of the gut.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 24-week synbiotic supplementation on chronic inflammation and the gut microbiota in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. We randomized 88 obese patients with type 2 diabetes to one of two groups for 24 weeks: control or synbiotic (Lacticaseibacillus paracasei strain Shirota (previously Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota) and Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult, and galactooligosaccharides). The primary endpoint was the change in interleukin-6 from baseline to 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were evaluation of the gut microbiota in feces and blood, fecal organic acids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, and glycemic control. Synbiotic administration for 24 weeks did not significantly affect changes in interleukin-6 from baseline to 24 weeks (0.35 ± 1.99 vs. −0.24 ± 1.75 pg/mL, respectively). Relative to baseline, however, at 24 weeks after synbiotic administration there were positive changes in the counts of Bifidobacterium and total lactobacilli, the relative abundances of Bifidobacterium species such as Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, and the concentrations of acetic and butyric acids in feces. No significant changes in inflammatory markers were found in the synbiotic group compared to the control group. However, synbiotic administration at least partially improved the gut environment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

•Synbiotics given preoperatively reduced inflammation, antibiotic use, and length of stay in postoperative colorectal cancer patients. Objectives: Gastrointestinal microflora is involved in the development and regulation of the immune response. Non-pathogenic bacteria are important to prevent the development and subsequent invasion of enteropathogenic bacteria. Surgical trauma and intestinal preparation can disrupt the intestinal microbiota balance. Modulating the microbiota in the preoperative period in patients with colorectal cancer may have an effect on the occurrence of postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of preoperative synbiotic administration in patients with colorectal cancer subjected to colorectal resection. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 73 patients with colorectal cancer. Eight days before surgery, patients were randomized to receive either synbiotics (Simbioflora, Farmoquimica, São Paulo, Brazi) or placebo (maltodextrin). The envelopes were identical and labeled A or B. All patients underwent nutritional assessment and measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, serum albumin, and transferrin. Patients were given a diluted envelope in 100 mL of water twice daily for 7 d. The occurrence of infectious or non-infectious complications, time of antibiotic use, duration of hospitalization, and occurrence of deaths were recorded for 30 d postoperatively. Results: Mean age, demographic data, and tumor staging were similar between the groups at baseline. After 7 d of synbiotic intake, there were significant reductions in IL-6 levels (163.2 ± 19.5 versus 138.8 ± 12.5, P < 0.001) and CRP (10 ± 5.2 versus 7.17 ± 3.2, P < 0.001), whereas the control group did not present significant changes I IL-6 levels (154.2 ± 18.3 versus 160.9 ± 18.6, NS) or CRP (10.6 ± 6.18 versus 10.4 ± 6.1, NS). Serum albumin and transferrin did not show significant changes. Postoperative infectious complications occurred in 2.8% of patients in the synbiotic group and in 18.9% of the control group (P = 0.02). The mean antibiotic usage time was 1.42 ± 0.5 d in the synbiotic group and 3.74 ± 4.3 d in the control group (P < 0.001). The mean hospital length of stay was 3 ± 1 d in the synbiotic group and 4 ± 18 in the control group (P < 0.001). Three deaths were reported in the control group and none in the synbiotic group (P = 0.115). Conclusions: The use of synbiotics for 7 d preoperatively in patients with colorectal cancer attenuates the inflammatory state and is associated with reductions in morbidity, hospital length of stay, and use of antibiotics.

Infant colic is defined as a recurrent and prolonged period of fussing, crying and/or irritability that cannot be prevented or resolved by caregivers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a synbiotic (Bactecal D Liquid) in infants consulting a primary health care professional for inconsolable crying. A randomized trial was conducted in 68 infants diagnosed by the consulted primary health care professional as “probably suffering from infant colic”. Patients were randomized into two groups and given the synbiotic once (group 1) or twice (group 2) a day for 28 days. Quality of life (QoL) of the caregivers, evaluated with a Likert scale, was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the total number of crying episodes, total crying time, gassiness and “balling of the fists”. The median (Q1;Q3) QoL scores were significantly ( p  < 0.001) higher on day 28 than at baseline: 6 (5;7) vs 2 (1;3). At baseline, there was no significant difference ( p  = 0.527) in QoL between both groups. The improvement in QoL was already significant after one week of intervention for both groups. The median number of crying episodes, overall crying time, gassiness and “balling of fists” were significantly lower on day 28 compared to baseline ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion : The synbiotic tested was shown to be efficacious in the management of infant colic. A significant improvement was observed after 7 days of intervention, which is much earlier than the expected decrease related to the natural evolution of infant colic. What is Known: • Some probiotic strains are reported to be effective in the management of infants presenting with colic, if breastfed. What is New: • The synbiotic studied improved quality of life of caregivers of infants presenting infant colic. • Two doses of the synbiotic were not more effective than one dose. • The improved occurred within one week. • The improvement was independent of feeding (breastfeeding, formula feeding or mixed feeding).

Background: In healthy adults, probiotic supplementation alone does not increase Urolithin A (UroA) and rarely increases butyrate, both microbiome-derived metabolites that influence key biological functions involved in regulating gastrointestinal symptoms. Accordingly, this clinical trial evaluated key biological functions of a multi-species synbiotic with 24 probiotic strains and a polyphenol-based prebiotic using capsule-in-capsule delivery technology. Methods: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial among healthy participants (n = 32). Participants were administered a daily synbiotic (53.6 billion AFU multi-species probiotic and 400 mg Indian pomegranate extract; DS-01) or matching placebo for 91 days. Samples were obtained at baseline Day 0, and Days 7, 14, 49, and 91. Endpoints included changes in fecal microbiome composition, urinary UroA, fecal butyrate, serum CRP, and safety. Results: The synbiotic significantly increased alpha-diversity of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus spp. at all timepoints, including at end-of-study (Day 91, p < 0.0001) and increased native beneficial microbes. UroA production was significantly increased in the synbiotic arm at short-term (Day 7, 12-fold, p < 0.02) and long-term (Day 91, 49-fold, p < 0.001) timepoints. A higher proportion of synbiotic participants were capable of converting polyphenols into UroA (Day 91, 100% vs. 44.4%; p < 0.01). Mechanistically, synbiotic participants showed an increased abundance of Lactobacillus species involved in UroA precursor metabolism and UroA-producing Gordonibacter species. The synbiotic also significantly increased fecal butyrate levels (p < 0.03), and butyrate-producing species, in low-baseline butyrate producers, through Day 91, and was associated with reduced systemic inflammation. Conclusions: This multi-species synbiotic significantly increases diversity and abundance of key beneficial bacteria, enhances UroA production and butyrate levels, and is associated with lowered systemic inflammation. This is the first synbiotic to increase both UroA and butyrate.

Although non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the leading aetiology of liver disorders in the world, there is no proven treatment for NAFLD patients with normal or low BMI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of synbiotics supplementation in NAFLD patients with normal or low BMI. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial, fifty patients with NAFLD were assigned to take either a synbiotic supplement or a placebo capsule for 28 weeks. Both groups were advised to follow a healthy lifestyle. At the end of the study, hepatic steatosis and fibrosis reduced in both groups; however, the mean reduction was significantly greater in the synbiotic group rather than in the placebo group (P<0·001). Furthermore, serum levels of fasting blood sugar, TAG and most of the inflammatory mediators reduced in the synbiotic group significantly compared with the placebo group (P<0·05). Our results provide evidence that synbiotic supplementation improves the main features of NAFLD in patients with normal and low BMI, at least partially through reduction in inflammatory indices. Further studies are needed to address the exact mechanism of action of these effects.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is the most prevalent chronic liver disease in Western countries; it can progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma. The importance of gut-liver-adipose tissue axis has become evident and treatments targeting gut microbiota may improve inflammatory and metabolic parameters in NASH patients. In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, involving 50 biopsy-proven NASH patients, we investigated the effects of synbiotic supplementation on metabolic parameters, hepatic steatosis, intestinal permeability, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) serum levels. Patients were separated into two groups receiving Lactobacillus reuteri with guar gum and inulin for three months and healthy balanced nutritional counseling versus nutritional counseling alone. Before and after the intervention we assessed steatosis by magnetic resonance imaging, intestinal permeability by lactulose/mannitol urinary excretion and SIBO by glucose breath testing. NASH patients presented high gut permeability, but low prevalence of SIBO. After the intervention, only the synbiotic group presented a reduction in steatosis, lost weight, diminished BMI and waist circumference measurement. Synbiotic did not improve intestinal permeability or LPS levels. We concluded that synbiotic supplementation associated with nutritional counseling seems superior to nutritional counseling alone for NASH treatment as it attenuates steatosis and may help to achieve weight loss.

Abstract Context Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy affecting women of reproductive age. Objective This study was designed to evaluate effects of lifestyle modifications and synbiotic supplementation on PCOS. Design A randomized (1:1) double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Setting Academic hospital. Patients or Other Participants Overweight and obese women with PCOS were identified according to the Rotterdam criteria. Evaluations were performed at baseline and repeated after 3 months of treatment. Intervention Lifestyle modifications in combination with synbiotic supplementation or placebo. Main Outcome Measures Change in body mass index (BMI) and testosterone level. Results In the placebo group, a 5% decrease in BMI was accompanied by significant decreases of the waist, hip, and thigh circumferences. The synbiotic group experienced an 8% decrease in BMI, which was significantly greater than that in the control group (P = 0.03) and was accompanied by decreases in the waist, hip, and thigh circumferences. Testosterone did not decrease significantly in the placebo group (decrease of 6%), whereas in the synbiotic group it decreased by 32% (P < 0.0001). The decrease of testosterone was significantly greater in the synbiotic group than in the placebo group (P = 0.016). Conclusions Synbiotic supplementation potentiated effects of lifestyle modifications on weight loss and led to significant reduction of serum testosterone.

Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Evidence suggests that alterations in the gut microbiome could play a role in cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of synbiotics on serum paraoxonase 1(PON1), soluble CD163/soluble TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (sCD163/sTWEAK), and lipid profile, which are involved in heart failure in patients with chronic heart failure. In this triple-blind randomized clinical trial, 90 eligible patients were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to receive one capsule (500 mg) of synbiotics or a placebo daily for ten weeks. Serum PON1, sCD163/sTWEAK, and lipid profiles were measured at the beginning and end of the study. The data were analyzed by SPSS 24, and the p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Among 90 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 80 completed the study. The primary outcomes showed a small effect on sTWEAK, with an adjusted standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.2. However, no significant changes were observed in sCD163/sTWEAK (SMD: 0.16). Secondary outcomes indicated no changes in PON1, total cholesterol (TC), or LDL-C levels. However, there was an increase in HDL-C levels (adjusted SMD: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.02–0.91) and a decrease in TG and TC/HDL levels (adjusted SMD: − 0.5 and − 0.3, respectively) in the synbiotic group. A favorable effect of synbiotics on sTWEAK, HDL, TG, and TC/HDL of patients with heart failure was observed, but no statistically significant effect was found on sCD163/sTWEAK, PON1, LDL, and TC factors.

Targeting gut microbiota with synbiotics (probiotic supplements containing prebiotic components) is emerging as a promising intervention in the comprehensive nutritional approach to reducing obesity. Weight loss resulting from low-carbohydrate high-protein diets can be significant but has also been linked to potentially negative health effects due to increased bacterial fermentation of undigested protein within the colon and subsequent changes in gut microbiota composition. Correcting obesity-induced disruption of gut microbiota with synbiotics can be more effective than supplementation with probiotics alone because prebiotic components of synbiotics support the growth and survival of positive bacteria therein. The purpose of this placebo-controlled intervention clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of a synbiotic supplement on the composition, richness and diversity of gut microbiota and associations of microbial species with body composition parameters and biomarkers of obesity in human subjects participating in a weight loss program. The probiotic component of the synbiotic used in the study contained Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium bifidum and the prebiotic component was a galactooligosaccharide mixture. The results showed no statistically significant differences in body composition (body mass, BMI, body fat mass, body fat percentage, body lean mass, and bone mineral content) between the placebo and synbiotic groups at the end of the clinical trial (3-month intervention, 20 human subjects participating in weight loss intervention based on a low-carbohydrate, high-protein, reduced energy diet). Synbiotic supplementation increased the abundance of gut bacteria associated with positive health effects, especially Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, and it also appeared to increase the gut microbiota richness. A decreasing trend in the gut microbiota diversity in the placebo and synbiotic groups was observed at the end of trial, which may imply the effect of the high-protein low-carbohydrate diet used in the weight loss program. Regression analysis performed to correlate abundance of species following supplementation with body composition parameters and biomarkers of obesity found an association between a decrease over time in blood glucose and an increase in Lactobacillus abundance, particularly in the synbiotic group. However, the decrease over time in body mass, BMI, waist circumstance, and body fat mass was associated with a decrease in Bifidobacterium abundance. The results obtained support the conclusion that synbiotic supplement used in this clinical trial modulates human gut microbiota by increasing abundance of potentially beneficial microbial species.