Explore the vast range of titles available.

This paper critically examines model compression techniques within the machine learning (ML) domain, emphasizing their role in enhancing model efficiency for deployment in resource-constrained environments, such as mobile devices, edge computing, and Internet of Things (IoT) systems. By systematically exploring compression techniques and lightweight design architectures, it is provided a comprehensive understanding of their operational contexts and effectiveness. The synthesis of these strategies reveals a dynamic interplay between model performance and computational demand, highlighting the balance required for optimal application. As machine learning (ML) models grow increasingly complex and data-intensive, the demand for computational resources and memory has surged accordingly. This escalation presents significant challenges for the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in real-world applications, particularly where hardware capabilities are limited. Therefore, model compression techniques are not merely advantageous but essential for ensuring that these models can be utilized across various domains, maintaining high performance without prohibitive resource requirements. Furthermore, this review underscores the importance of model compression in sustainable artificial intelligence (AI) development. The introduction of hybrid methods, which combine multiple compression techniques, promises to deliver superior performance and efficiency. Additionally, the development of intelligent frameworks capable of selecting the most appropriate compression strategy based on specific application needs is crucial for advancing the field. The practical examples and engineering applications discussed demonstrate the real-world impact of these techniques. By optimizing the balance between model complexity and computational efficiency, model compression ensures that the advancements in AI technology remain sustainable and widely applicable. This comprehensive review thus contributes to the academic discourse and guides innovative solutions for efficient and responsible machine learning practices, paving the way for future advancements in the field.

Objective: The purpose of the research is to understand the technological evolution of agriculture over the years and propose a new perspective for the practices that are becoming established in agribusiness.   Theoretical framework: The study analyzes agricultural activities practiced from the beginning of agriculture up to the present day to demonstrate the trends that are likely to gain strength in this sector in the coming years.   Method: The investigation aimed to be descriptive. Bibliographic and documentary research were used as methodological procedures.   Results and conclusion: The findings suggest that the agribusiness sector is transitioning into a novel phase termed Agriculture 6.0, wherein sustainability assumes a pivotal role in business advancement. A paradigmatic shift is observed in production processes, characterized by an ongoing pursuit of ecosystem preservation and restoration, in congruence with the aspirations of future generations for an improved quality of life.   Research implications: The proposal of a new technological model that characterizes the evolution of agricultural activities is focused on defining concepts, systems, technologies/services, and areas of study. This enables agribusiness organizations to gain a deeper understanding of the transformations occurring in the macro-environment, thereby considering these aspects in their planning processes.   Originality/value: Brazil is one of the world's largest agricultural producers and exporters. Therefore, in order to continue solidifying itself as a sustainable supplier of food, fibers, and other agricultural products, the country needs to remain attentive to the changes demanded by the environment and the trends that are gaining strength in the current scenario. Objetivo: O propósito da pesquisa é entender a evolução tecnológica da agricultura ao longo dos anos e propor uma nova visão para as práticas que estão se consolidando no agronegócio. Referencial teórico: O estudo analisa as atividades agrícolas praticadas desde o início da agricultura até os dias atuais em função de mostrar quais são as tendências que devem ganhar força nesse setor nos próximos anos. Método: A investigação possui teor descritivo. Pesquisas bibliográficas e documentais foram utilizadas como procedimentos metodológicos. Resultados e conclusão: Os resultados sugerem que o agronegócio está entrando em uma nova era, chamada agricultura 6.0, que coloca a sustentabilidade no centro do desenvolvimento dos negócios. Há uma mudança de paradigma na forma de produzir com uma busca incessante pela preservação e recuperação dos ecossistemas, em linha com o que as gerações futuras almejam para uma melhor qualidade de vida. Implicações da pesquisa: A proposta de um novo modelo tecnológico que caracterize a evolução da atividade agropecuária tem como foco a definição dos conceitos, sistemas, tecnologias/serviços e áreas de estudo, para que organizações do agronegócio possam compreender melhor as transformações que têm acontecido no macroambiente para considerar estes aspectos em seu processo de planejamento. Originalidade/valor: O Brasil é um dos maiores produtores e exportadores agrícolas do mundo. Dessa forma, para continuar se consolidando como fornecedor sustentável de alimentos, fibras e outros agro-produtos, o país precisa estar atento às mudanças que o ambiente exige e as tendências que se fortalecem à luz do contexto atual.

Evolution is the process by which species adapt over time to their environments. The tricky part about human evolution is that, as technology builders, we have the power to alter our environments--and even build new, unprecedented conditions in which to immerse ourselves. This is an extraordinary mastery of nature. Not only can we keep the ruthless process of natural selection at bay; we can force nature to bend to us. But the effects of upending the evolutionary process are not as simple as they may seem. Gluckman and Hanson, both leaders in the exciting new field of evolutionary medicine, explore how, even as our ingenious innovations allow us to thrive, they create unforeseen consequences that demand further ingenuity. We've made the environments around us more food-rich, for example--but at the cost of rampant obesity. We've learned to wipe out the pathogens that most commonly make us ill, but in doing so encouraged the rise of antibiotic-resistant superbugs that our bodies are desperately unable to fend off. We have created new information and communication environs that stimulate our intellectual curiosity and challenge our abstract thinking capacities. The downsides are new forms of social dysfunction and sources of psychological stress. Ironically, in many ways, our efforts to be more comfortable have led to dire consequences for our health. Every time we transform our world, we are confronted by a world that challenges us anew. Ingenious opens our eyes to the dangers we face and offers solutions we cannot ignore.-- Provided by publisher

In the ever-changing technical world, this article compares the societal implications of two technological behemoths: silicon technology and steel technology. Silicon technology, best recognized for its role in integrated circuits and electronics, ushered in the digital age, revolutionizing the way people communicate, calculate, and conduct business. Steel technology, on the other hand, has formed the foundation of contemporary infrastructure and industries due to its strength and versatility. This research thoroughly investigates their economic, environmental, and social implications, providing light on their distinct and common contributions to society. It also looks into the astonishing history of silicon integrated circuit technology, tracking its route from Moore’s Law-driven aggressive growth to the current emphasis on energy efficiency and power consumption reduction. The paper’s investigation is critical in understanding the delicate interplay between innovation and social advancement, and it provides insights into technology’s transformational capacity. As we stand at the crossroads of these two technical domains, this research emphasizes the historical relevance of silicon and steel technologies, as well as their ability to shape our technological future. It enables readers to study the dynamic interplay between silicon and steel via a comparative perspective, exposing their revolutionary contributions and the intricate web of societal advancement they have woven throughout history.

One of the fundamental problems in the field of technological studies is to clarify the drivers and dynamics of technological evolution for sustaining industrial and economic change. This study confronts the problem by analyzing the converging technologies to explain effects on the evolutionary dynamics over time. This paper focuses on technological interaction between artificial intelligence and quantum technologies using a technometric model of technological evolution based on scientific and technological information (publications and patents). Findings show that quantum technology has a growth rate of 1.07, artificial intelligence technology has a rate of growth of 1.37, whereas the technological interaction of converging quantum and artificial intelligence technologies has an accelerated rate of growth of 1.58, higher than trends of these technologies taken individually. These findings suggest that technological interaction is one of the fundamental determinants in the rapid evolution of path-breaking technologies and disruptive innovations. The deductive implications of results about the effects of converging technologies are: (a) accelerated evolutionary growth; (b) a disproportionate (allometric) growth of patents driven by publications supporting a fast technological evolution. Our results support policy and managerial implications for the decision making of policymakers, technology analysts, and R&D managers that can direct R&D investments towards fruitful inter-relationships between radical technologies to foster scientific and technological change with positive societal and economic impcats.

\"Team Human is a manifesto--a fiery distillation of preeminent digital theorist Douglas Rushkoff's most urgent thoughts on civilization and human nature. In one hundred lean and incisive statements, he argues that we are essentially social creatures, and that we achieve our greatest aspirations when we work together--not as individuals. Yet today society is threatened by a vast antihuman infrastructure that undermines our ability to connect. Money, once a means of exchange, is now a means of exploitation; education, conceived as way to elevate the working class, has become another assembly line; and the internet has only further divided us into increasingly atomized and radicalized groups. Team Human delivers a call to arms. If we are to resist and survive these destructive forces, we must recognize that being human is a team sport. In Rushkoff's own words: \"Being social may be the whole point.\" Harnessing wide-ranging research on human evolution, biology, and psychology, Rushkoff shows that when we work together we realize greater happiness, productivity, and peace. If we can find the others who understand this fundamental truth and reassert our humanity--together--we can make the world a better place to be human.\"--Provided by publisher.

We know that there are fundamental differences between humans and living apes, and also between living humans and their extinct relatives. It is also probably the case that the most significant and divergent of these differences relate to our social behaviour and its underlying cognition, as much as to fundamental differences in physiology, biochemistry or anatomy. In this paper, we first attempt to demarcate what are the principal differences between human and other societies in terms of social structure, organization and relationships, so that we can identify what derived features require explanation. We then consider the evidence of the archaeological and fossil record, to determine the most probable context in time and taxonomy, of these evolutionary trends. Finally, we attempt to link five major transitional points in hominin evolution to the selective context in which they occurred, and to use the principles of behavioural ecology to understand their ecological basis. Critical changes in human social organization relate to the development of a larger scale of fission and fusion; the development of a greater degree of nested substructures within the human community; and the development of intercommunity networks. The underlying model that we develop is that the evolution of 'human society' is underpinned by ecological factors, but these are influenced as much by technological and behavioural innovations as external environmental change.