Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
802 result(s) for "tricuspid regurgitation"
Sort by:
Atrial‐secondary tricuspid regurgitation: a better prognosis in early stage heart failure, but not in late stage
Background and Aims Although the classification of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR) by atrial or ventricular aetiology (A‐STR or V‐STR) carries prognostic importance, the confounding effects of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class have not yet been elucidated. We aimed to correlate STR and NYHA classification with patient outcomes. Methods We studied 281 patients with severe STR who presented to 16 French hospitals between 2017 and 2019. Patients were separated into A‐STR and V‐STR categories using echocardiographic criteria (A‐STR = tricuspid tenting height ≤10 mm, right mid‐ventricular diameter ≤38 mm, and LVEF ≥ 50%). We tracked time to cardiovascular disease‐related hospitalization or death, whichever came first. Results Of the patients 91/281 (32.7%) had A‐STR, 164/281 (58.4%) had mixed/V‐STR, and 25/281 (8.9%) could not be classified. Baseline age, labs, comorbidities and NYHA category (Class I–II = mildly symptomatic, Class III–IV = very symptomatic) did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). Although there were no differences in event‐free survival among groups (70.7% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.59), this was confounded by NYHA class (P = 0.0104). Thus, among mildly symptomatic patients, estimated 5 year event‐free survival was 76.4% in the A‐STR group and 53.2% in the mixed/V‐STR group (P < 0.05). Among very symptomatic patients, there was no difference in estimated event‐free survival (39.4% vs. 17.2%, P > 0.05). Conclusions Though A‐STR carries a more favourable prognosis in mildly symptomatic patients, this distinction is irrelevant in patients with advanced disease. Thus, the value of tricuspid valve intervention may become ‘too little, too late’ if A‐STR is not promptly addressed. Atrial TR as more favourable prognosis except in advanced patients.
PASCAL versus MitraClip-XTR edge-to-edge device for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation: a propensity-matched analysis
BackgroundTranscatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) is a promising technique for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Data comparing the performance of novel edge-to-edge devices (PASCAL and MitraClip-XTR) are scarce.MethodsWe identified 80 consecutive patients who underwent TTVR using either the PASCAL or MitraClip-XTR system to treat symptomatic TR from July 2018 to June 2020. To adjust for baseline imbalances, we performed a propensity score (PS) 1:1 matching. The primary endpoint was a reduction in TR severity by at least one grade at 30 days.ResultsThe PS-matched cohort (n = 44) was at high-surgical risk (EuroSCORE II: 7.5% [interquartile range (IQR) 4.8–12.1%]) with a mean TR grade of 4.3 ± 0.8 and median coaptation gap of 6.2 mm [IQR 3.2–9.1 mm]. The primary endpoint was similarly observed in both groups (PASCAL: 91% vs. MitraClip-XTR: 96%). Multiple device implantation was the most common form (59% vs. 82%, p = 0.19), and the occurrence of SLDA was comparable between the PASCAL and MitraClip-XTR system (5.7% [2 of 35 implanted devices] vs. 4.4% [2 of 45 implanted devices], p = 0.99). No periprocedural death or conversions to surgery occurred, and 30-day mortality (5.0% vs. 5.0%, log-rank p = 0.99) and 3-month mortality (10.0% vs. 5.0%, log-rank p = 0.56) were similar between both groups. During follow-up, functional NYHA class, 6-min walking distance, and health status improved in both groups.ConclusionsBoth TTVR devices, PASCAL and MitraClip-XTR, appeared feasible and comparable for an effective TR reduction. Randomized head-to-head comparisons will help to further define the appropriate scope of application of each system.
Echocardiographic diagnosis and clinical implications of wide-open tricuspid regurgitation for evaluating right ventricular dysfunction in the emergency department
The tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient (TRPG) reflects the difference in pressure between the right ventricle and right atrium (ΔPRV-RA). Its estimation by echocardiography correlates well with that obtained using right-heart catheterization. An elevated TRPG is an important marker for identifying right ventricular dysfunction in both the acute and chronic settings. However, in the “wide-open” variant of TR, the TRPG counterintuitively falls. Failure to recognize this potential pitfall and underlying pathophysiology can cause underestimation of the severity of right ventricular dysfunction. This could lead to erroneous fluid tolerance assessments, and potentially harmful resuscitative and airway management strategies. In this manuscript, we illustrate the pathophysiology and potential pitfall of wide-open TR through a series of cases in which emergency physicians made the diagnosis using cardiac point-of-care ultrasound. To our knowledge, this clinical series is the first to demonstrate recognition of the paradoxically-low TRPG of wide-open TR, which guided appropriate management of critically ill patients in the emergency department.
Atrial Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation as a Distinct Pathophysiological and Clinical Entity: No Idiopathic Tricuspid Regurgitation Anymore
Functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) is a strong and independent predictor of patient morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The development of transcatheter procedures to either repair or replace the tricuspid valve (TV) has fueled the interest in the pathophysiology, severity assessment, and clinical consequences of FTR. FTR has been considered to be secondary to tricuspid annulus (TA) dilation and leaflet tethering, associated to right ventricular (RV) dilation and/or dysfunction (the “classical”, ventricular form of FTR, V-FTR) for a long time. Atrial FTR (A-FTR) has recently emerged as a distinct pathophysiological entity. A-FTR typically occurs in patients with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation, in whom an imbalance between the TA and leaflet areas results in leaflets malcoaptation, associated with the dilation and loss of the sphincter-like function of the TA, due to right atrium enlargement and dysfunction. According to its distinct pathophysiology, A-FTR poses different needs of clinical management, and the various interventional treatment options will likely have different outcomes than in V-FTR patients. This review aims to provide an insight into the anatomy of the TV, and the distinct pathophysiology of A-FTR, which are key concepts to understanding the objectives of therapy, the choice of transcatheter TV interventions, and to properly use pre-, intra-, and post-procedural imaging.
What echocardiographic findings differentiate acute pulmonary embolism and chronic pulmonary hypertension?
Pulmonary embolism (PE) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) are potentially fatal disease states. Early diagnosis and goal-directed management improve outcomes and survival. Both conditions share several echocardiographic findings of right ventricular dysfunction. This can inadvertently lead to incorrect diagnosis, inappropriate and potentially harmful management, and delay in time-sensitive therapies. Fortunately, bedside echocardiography imparts a few critical distinctions. This narrative review describes eight physiologically interdependent echocardiographic parameters that help distinguish acute PE and chronic PH. The manuscript details each finding along with associated pathophysiology and summarization of the literature evaluating diagnostic utility. This guide then provides pearls and pitfalls with high-quality media for the bedside evaluation. The echocardiographic parameters suggesting acute or chronic right ventricular dysfunction (best used in combination) are: 1. Right heart thrombus (acute PE) 2. Right ventricular free wall thickness (acute ≤ 5 mm, chronic > 5 mm) 3. Tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient (acute ≤ 46 mmHg, chronic > 46 mmHg, corresponding to tricuspid regurgitation maximal velocity ≤ 3.4 m/sec and > 3.4 m/sec, respectively) 4. Pulmonary artery acceleration time (acute ≤ 60-80 msec, chronic < 105 msec) 5. 60/60 sign (acute) 6. Pulmonary artery early-systolic notching (proximally-located, higher-risk PE) 7. McConnell’s sign (acute) 8. Right atrial enlargement (equal to left atrial size suggests acute, greater than left atrial size suggests chronic). Emergency physicians must appreciate the echocardiographic findings and associated pathophysiology that help distinguish acute and chronic right ventricular dysfunction. In the proper clinical context, these findings can point towards PE or PH, thereby leading to earlier goal-directed management.
Significant functional tricuspid regurgitation portends poor outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction
Background Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) can be found in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The results of previous studies are controversial about whether significant functional TR (FTR) in patients with AF leads to worse clinical outcomes. The aims of the study were to investigate the prevalence, predictors and prognosis of significant FTR in patients with AF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods The present study was a retrospective cohort study in patients with AF and preserved LVEF from May 2013 through January 2018. Significant FTR was defined as moderate to severe TR without structural abnormality of the tricuspid valve. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was defined as pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥ 50 mmHg or mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mmHg determined by echocardiography. The adverse outcomes were defined as heart failure and death from any cause within 2 years of follow up. Results A total of 300 patients with AF (mean age 68.8 ± 10.8 years, 50% male) were included in the study. Paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF were reported in 34.7 and 65.3% of patients, respectively. Mean LVEF was 65.3 ± 6.3%. PH and significant FTR were observed in 31.3 and 21.7% of patients, respectively. Patients with significant FTR were significantly older, more female gender and non-paroxysmal AF, and had higher left atrial volume index and pulmonary artery pressure than those without. A total of 26 (8.7%) patients died and heart failure occurred in 39 (13.0%) patients. There was a statistically significant difference in the adverse outcomes between patients with significant and insignificant FTR (44.6% vs. 11.9%, p  <  0.010). Multivariable analysis showed that factors associated with significant FTR were female gender, presence of PH and left atrial volume index (OR = 2.61, 1.87, and 1.04, respectively). The predictors of the adverse outcomes in patients with AF were significant FTR, presence of PH and high CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (OR = 5.23, 2.23 and 1.60, respectively). Conclusions Significant FTR was common in patients with AF, and independently associated with adverse outcomes. Thus, comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of FTR in patients with AF and preserved LVEF is fundamental in determining the optimal management.
Functional Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation across the Whole Spectrum of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Recognizing the Elephant in the Room of Heart Failure
Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) occur due to cardiac remodeling in the presence of structurally normal valve apparatus. Two main mechanisms are involved, distinguishing an atrial functional form (when annulus dilatation is predominant) and a ventricular form (when ventricular remodeling and dysfunction predominate). Both affect the prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF) across the entire spectrum of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), including preserved (HFpEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF), or reduced (HFrEF). Currently, data on the management of functional valve regurgitation in the various HF phenotypes are limited. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of FMR and FTR within the different patterns of HF, as defined by LVEF.
Outcomes of Ebstein's Anomaly Patients Treated with Tricuspid Valvuloplasty or Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Experience of a Single Center
Background: The incidence of Ebstein's anomaly is extremely low, and except for the Mayo Clinic, no cardiac center has reported on a sufficient number of patients. The aim of our study was to report the outcomes of Ebstein's anomaly patients treated with tricuspid valvuloplasty (TVP) or tricuspid valve replacement (TVR). Methods: TVP or TVR was performed in 245 patients from July 2006 to April 2016. We reviewed patients' records and contacted patients via outpatient service and over the telephone. Results: The mean follow-up time was 43.6 ± 32.6 months, and 224 (91.4%) patients underwent follow-up. The mean operative age was 31.2 ± 15.7 years. TVR was performed in 23 patients, and TVP was performed in 201 patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.3%, and the overall survival rate was 97.9% at 5 and 10 years. The early mortality rate of the TVP group was lower than that of the TVR group (0.5% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.028), and the overall mortality rate of the TVP group was lower than that of the TVR group, without statistical significance (1.0% vs. 8.7%). After propensity score matching, the rates of mortality and New York Heart Association class ≥ III were lower in the TVP group than those in the TVR group without statistical significance. Seven patients with Type B Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome underwent one-stage surgery, and arrhythmias disappeared. Six patients suffered from episodes of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) during surgery. Severe LVOTO could be treated with reoperation of the atrialized right ventricle. Conclusions: Ebstein's anomaly patients treated with TVP or TVR can experience optimal outcomes with midterm follow-up. However, TVP should be the first-choice treatment. Optimal outcomes can be obtained from one-stage operation in patients with Type B WPW syndrome. Severe LVOTO during surgery might be related to improper operation of the atrialized right ventricle.
Preoperative Predictors of Recurrent Tricuspid Regurgitation After Annuloplasty: Insights into the Role of 3D Echocardiography
Background: While tricuspid annuloplasty (TAP) is an effective treatment option for tricuspid regurgitation (TR), understanding the echocardiographic factors contributing to recurrent TR can help in developing more effective preventive measures to reduce the rate of recurrent TR after TAP. Methods: This study was designed as a prospective observational cohort study to investigate factors contributing to recurrent TR following surgical tricuspid valve (TV) repair in patients with moderate or severe functional TR caused by left heart valvular disease, with severe mitral regurgitation as the dominant pathology. The study included 66 patients who underwent preoperative two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic assessments. Patients were divided into two groups based on TAP outcomes: the effective TAP group and the recurrent TR group. Results: The analysis revealed that 3D-derived both septal–lateral diastolic and systolic tricuspid annulus (TA) diameter (odds ratio (OR) 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17–2.68 and OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.14–2.29, respectively), and major axis diastolic TA diameter (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.15–2.2) had the highest OR among all echocardiographic parameters. The further univariate analysis of predefined echocardiographic values unveiled that the combined effect of heightened 3D-measured TA major axis diastolic diameter and increased right ventricle (RV) basal diameter exhibited the highest OR at 12.8 (95% CI 2.3–72.8) for a recurrent TR. Using ROC analysis, diastolic major axis (area under the curve (AUC) 0.848; cut-off 48.5 mm), septal-lateral systolic (AUC 0.840; cut-off 43.5 mm) and diastolic (AUC 0.840; cut-off 46.5 mm) TA diameter demonstrated the highest predictive value for recurrent TR from all TV parameters. Conclusions: Recurrent moderate or severe TR after TAP is associated with preoperative TA size, right atrium and RV geometry, but not with changes of RV function. The predictive capacity of 2D-assessed echocardiographic parameters was found to be lower when compared to their corresponding 3D parameters.
Tricuspid annulus: A spatial and temporal analysis
Background: Traditional two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic evaluation of tricuspid annulus (TA) dilation is based on single-frame measurements of the septolateral (S-L) dimension. This may not represent either the axis or the extent of dynamism through the entire cardiac cycle. In this study, we used real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to analyze geometric changes in multiple axes of the TA throughout the cardiac cycle in patients without right ventricular abnormalities. Materials and Methods: R-wave-gated 3D TEE images of the TA were acquired in 39 patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. The patients with abnormal right ventricular/tricuspid structure or function were excluded from the study. For each patient, eight points along the TA were traced in the 3D dataset and used to reconstruct the TA at four stages of the cardiac cycle (end- and mid-systole, end- and mid-diastole). Statistical analyses were applied to determine whether TA area, perimeter, axes, and planarity changed significantly over each stage of the cardiac cycle. Results: TA area (P = 0.012) and perimeter (P = 0.024) both changed significantly over the cardiac cycle. Of all the axes, only the posterolateral-anteroseptal demonstrated significant dynamism (P < 0.001). There was also a significant displacement in the vertical axis between the points and the regression plane in end-systole (P < 0.001), mid-diastole (P = 0.014), and mid-systole (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The TA demonstrates selective dynamism over the cardiac cycle, and its axis of maximal dynamism is different from the axis (S-L) that is routinely measured with 2D TEE.