Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
3
result(s) for
"turbulent phase screen"
Sort by:
Novel Simulation and Analysis of Mie-Scattering Lidar for Detecting Atmospheric Turbulence Based on Non-Kolmogorov Turbulence Power Spectrum Model
by
Zhang, Yingnan
,
Gong, Xin
,
Li, Juan
in
Atmospheric turbulence
,
Electromagnetic waves
,
Fourier transforms
2022
The Mie-scattering lidar can detect atmospheric turbulence intensity by using the return signals of Gaussian beams at different heights. The power spectrum method and Zernike polynomial method are used to simulate the non-Kolmogorov turbulent phase plate, respectively, and the power spectrum method with faster running speed is selected for the subsequent simulation. In order to verify the possibility of detecting atmospheric turbulence by the Mie-scattering lidar, some numerical simulations are carried out. The power spectrum method is used to simulate the propagation of the Gaussian beam from the Mie-scattering lidar in a vertical path. The propagation characteristics of the Gaussian beam using a non-Kolmogorov turbulence model are obtained by analyzing the intensity distribution and spot drift effect. The simulation results show that the scintillation index of simulation is consistent with the theoretical value trend, and the accuracy is very high, indicating that the method of atmospheric turbulence detection using Mie-scattering lidar is effective. The simulation plays a guiding role for the subsequent experimental platform construction and equipment design.
Journal Article
Numerical Background-Oriented Schlieren for Phase Reconstruction and Its Potential Applications
by
Liu, Shiwei
,
Ren, Yichong
,
Tao, Zhiwei
in
Algorithms
,
Background-Oriented Schlieren
,
Buildings
2025
This study presents a comprehensive numerical framework for Background-Oriented Schlieren (BOS) to systematically evaluate its performance and reconstructive capabilities under complex flow conditions. This framework integrates two stages: forward modeling, using ray tracing to simulate image degradation, and inverse processing, using optical flow and a conjugate gradient algorithm to extract displacements and reconstruct phase information. This method is first validated using turbulent flow fields in the Johns Hopkins Turbulence Database, where the reconstructed phase screens closely match the original data, with relative errors below 4% and structural similarity indices above 0.75 in all cases, providing a possible restoration method for degraded flow field images. It is then applied to shock wave fields with varying Mach numbers; this method achieves meaningful reconstruction at short ranges but fails under long-range imaging due to severe wavefront distortions. However, even in degraded conditions, the extracted optical flow fields preserve structural features correlated with the underlying shock patterns, indicating potential for BOS-based target recognition. These findings highlight both the capabilities and limitations of BOS and suggest new pathways for extending its use beyond traditional flow visualization.
Journal Article
Evolution of Airy Beams in Turbulence Plasma Sheath
2024
In order to study the transmission characteristics of Airy beams in the plasma sheath, the flow field around a hypersonic vehicle was numerically simulated and analyzed based on the Navier–Stokes (N-S) equation and a turbulence model. Then, according to the characteristics of the thickness of the plasma flow field around the supersonic vehicle at the centimeter level, the double fast Fourier transform (D-FFT) algorithm and multi-random phase screens theory were used to predict the propagation characteristics of the Airy beams in the turbulent plasma sheath. The results show that the lower the height and the higher the speed, the smaller the thickness of the plasma sheath shock layer. The refractive index variation in the sheath shock layer has a significant influence on Airy beam transmission. At the same time, the transmission distance and the attenuation factor of the Airy beams also change the transmission quality of the Airy beams. The larger the attenuation factor, the smaller the drift, and the standard deviation decreases with an increase in the refractive index. Airy beams have smaller drifts compared to Gaussian beams and have advantages in suppressing turbulence.
Journal Article