Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
23,498
result(s) for
"up front"
Sort by:
in brief
2020
“Biracial identity, lgbtq+ and latinx, how suicide spreads, and embodying intersectionality. New research from the journals.”
Journal Article
in brief
2020
Couples and mental health, how tokenization can influence one’s perspective, and is race a factor in homeschooling? New research from the journals.
Journal Article
in brief
2020
Racial disparities and discrimination in the job market, why white women vote for trump, and are present day rap artists speaking to and about their communities?
Journal Article
in brief
2020
Sociology and empathy, why women aren’t running the world (yet), divorce in decline, and should you or shouldn’t you read the comment section? New research from the journals.
Journal Article
in brief
2019
How boys learn to believe they are smarter than girls, gray divorce, and why money can’t buy happiness: new research from the journals.
Journal Article
Competitive Effects of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling Adoption on Nutritional Quality
2020
“Facts Up Front” nutrition labels are a front-of-package (FOP) nutrition labeling system that presents key nutrient information on the front of packaged food and beverage products in an easy-to-read format. The authors conduct a large-scale empirical study to examine the effect of adoption of FOP labeling on products’ nutritional quality. The authors assemble a unique data set on packaged food products in the United States across 44 categories over 16 years. By using a difference-in-differences estimator, the authors find that FOP adoption in a product category leads to an improvement in the nutritional quality of other products in that category. This competitive response is stronger for premium brands and brands with narrower product line breadth as well as for categories involving unhealthy products and those that are more competitive in nature. The authors offer evidence regarding the role of nutrition information salience as the underlying mechanism; they also perform supplementary analyses to rule out potential self-selection issues and conduct a battery of robustness checks and falsification tests. The authors discuss the implications of the findings for public policy makers, consumers, manufacturers, and food retailers.
Journal Article