Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Background Numerous studies demonstrate associations between serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) and a variety of common disorders, including musculoskeletal, metabolic, cardiovascular, malignant, autoimmune, and infectious diseases. Although a causal link between serum 25(OH)D concentrations and many disorders has not been clearly established, these associations have led to widespread supplementation with vitamin D and increased laboratory testing for 25(OH)D in the general population. The benefit-risk ratio of this increase in vitamin D use is not clear, and the optimal vitamin D intake and the role of testing for 25(OH)D for disease prevention remain uncertain. Objective To develop clinical guidelines for the use of vitamin D (cholecalciferol [vitamin D3] or ergocalciferol [vitamin D2]) to lower the risk of disease in individuals without established indications for vitamin D treatment or 25(OH)D testing. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of clinical experts, along with experts in guideline methodology and systematic literature review, identified and prioritized 14 clinically relevant questions related to the use of vitamin D and 25(OH)D testing to lower the risk of disease. The panel prioritized randomized placebo-controlled trials in general populations (without an established indication for vitamin D treatment or 25[OH]D testing), evaluating the effects of empiric vitamin D administration throughout the lifespan, as well as in select conditions (pregnancy and prediabetes). The panel defined “empiric supplementation” as vitamin D intake that (a) exceeds the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) and (b) is implemented without testing for 25(OH)D. Systematic reviews queried electronic databases for publications related to these 14 clinical questions. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and guide recommendations. The approach incorporated perspectives from a patient representative and considered patient values, costs and resources required, acceptability and feasibility, and impact on health equity of the proposed recommendations. The process to develop this clinical guideline did not use a risk assessment framework and was not designed to replace current DRI for vitamin D. Results The panel suggests empiric vitamin D supplementation for children and adolescents aged 1 to 18 years to prevent nutritional rickets and because of its potential to lower the risk of respiratory tract infections; for those aged 75 years and older because of its potential to lower the risk of mortality; for those who are pregnant because of its potential to lower the risk of preeclampsia, intra-uterine mortality, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age birth, and neonatal mortality; and for those with high-risk prediabetes because of its potential to reduce progression to diabetes. Because the vitamin D doses in the included clinical trials varied considerably and many trial participants were allowed to continue their own vitamin D–containing supplements, the optimal doses for empiric vitamin D supplementation remain unclear for the populations considered. For nonpregnant people older than 50 years for whom vitamin D is indicated, the panel suggests supplementation via daily administration of vitamin D, rather than intermittent use of high doses. The panel suggests against empiric vitamin D supplementation above the current DRI to lower the risk of disease in healthy adults younger than 75 years. No clinical trial evidence was found to support routine screening for 25(OH)D in the general population, nor in those with obesity or dark complexion, and there was no clear evidence defining the optimal target level of 25(OH)D required for disease prevention in the populations considered; thus, the panel suggests against routine 25(OH)D testing in all populations considered. The panel judged that, in most situations, empiric vitamin D supplementation is inexpensive, feasible, acceptable to both healthy individuals and health care professionals, and has no negative effect on health equity. Conclusion The panel suggests empiric vitamin D for those aged 1 to 18 years and adults over 75 years of age, those who are pregnant, and those with high-risk prediabetes. Due to the scarcity of natural food sources rich in vitamin D, empiric supplementation can be achieved through a combination of fortified foods and supplements that contain vitamin D. Based on the absence of supportive clinical trial evidence, the panel suggests against routine 25(OH)D testing in the absence of established indications. These recommendations are not meant to replace the current DRIs for vitamin D, nor do they apply to people with established indications for vitamin D treatment or 25(OH)D testing. Further research is needed to determine optimal 25(OH)D levels for specific health benefits.

Patients with intestinal fat malabsorption and urolithiasis are particularly at risk of acquiring fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies. The aim of the study was to evaluate the vitamin status and metabolic profile before and after the supplementation of fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E and K (ADEK) in 51 patients with fat malabsorption due to different intestinal diseases both with and without urolithiasis. Anthropometric, clinical, blood and 24-h urinary parameters and dietary intake were assessed at baseline and after ADEK supplementation for two weeks. At baseline, serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity was higher in stone formers (SF; n = 10) than in non-stone formers (NSF; n = 41) but decreased significantly in SF patients after supplementation. Plasma vitamin D and E concentrations increased significantly and to a similar extent in both groups during intervention. While plasma vitamin D concentrations did not differ between the groups, vitamin E concentrations were significantly lower in the SF group than the NSF group before and after ADEK supplementation. Although vitamin D concentration increased significantly in both groups, urinary calcium excretion was not affected by ADEK supplementation. The decline in plasma AST activity in patients with urolithiasis might be attributed to the supplementation of ADEK. Patients with fat malabsorption may benefit from the supplementation of fat-soluble vitamins ADEK.

Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency is a global health issue that afflicts more than one billion children and adults worldwide. The consequences of vitamin D deficiency cannot be under estimated. There has been an association of vitamin D deficiency with a myriad of acute and chronic illnesses including preeclampsia, childhood dental caries, periodontitis, autoimmune disorders, infectious diseases, cardiovascular disease, deadly cancers, type 2 diabetes and neurological disorders. This review is to put into perspective the controversy surrounding the definition for vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency as well as providing guidance for how to treat and prevent vitamin D deficiency.

Vitamin D deficiency is a candidate risk factor for a range of adverse health outcomes. In a genome-wide association study of 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentration in 417,580 Europeans we identify 143 independent loci in 112 1-Mb regions, providing insights into the physiology of vitamin D and implicating genes involved in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, dermal tissue properties, and the sulphonation and glucuronidation of 25OHD. Mendelian randomization models find no robust evidence that 25OHD concentration has causal effects on candidate phenotypes (e.g. BMI, psychiatric disorders), but many phenotypes have (direct or indirect) causal effects on 25OHD concentration, clarifying the epidemiological relationship between 25OHD status and the health outcomes examined in this study. Vitamin D is a precursor of the steroid hormone 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and its deficiency is associated with many adverse health outcomes. Here, Revez et al. perform a genome-wide association study for circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D in 417,580 individuals and test for potential causal relationships with other traits using Mendelian randomization.

Summary The present study investigated the risk of incident hip fractures according to serum concentrations of vitamin K 1 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D in elderly Norwegians during long-term follow-up. The results showed that the combination of low concentrations of both vitamin D and K 1 provides a significant risk factor for hip fractures. Introduction This case-cohort study aims to investigate the associations between serum vitamin K 1 and hip fracture and the possible effect of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) on this association. Methods The source cohort was 21,774 men and women aged 65 to 79 years who attended Norwegian community-based health studies during 1994–2001. Hip fractures were identified through hospital registers during median follow-up of 8.2 years. Vitamins were determined in serum obtained at baseline in all hip fracture cases ( n  = 1090) and in a randomly selected subcohort ( n  = 1318). Cox proportional hazards regression with quartiles of serum vitamin K 1 as explanatory variable was performed. Analyses were further performed with the following four groups as explanatory variable: I: vitamin K 1  ≥ 0.76 and 25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/l, II: vitamin K 1  ≥ 0.76 and 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l, III: vitamin K 1  < 0.76 and 25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/l, and IV: vitamin K 1  < 0.76 and 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l. Results Age- and sex-adjusted analyses revealed an inverse association between quartiles of vitamin K 1 and the risk of hip fracture. Further, a 50 % higher risk of hip fracture was observed in subjects with both low vitamin K 1 and 25(OH)D compared with subjects with high vitamin K 1 and 25(OH)D (HR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.18–1.90). The association remained statistically significant after adjusting for body mass index, smoking, triglycerides, and serum α-tocopherol. No increased risk was observed in the groups low in one vitamin only. Conclusion Combination of low concentrations of vitamin K 1 and 25(OH)D is associated with increased risk of hip fractures.

SummaryThe associations of multiple vitamin deficiencies on incident fractures were uncertain, the relationships between serum vitamin markers and incident bone fractures were investigated in Japanese postmenopausal women. The number of deficiencies was additively associated with incident fracture after adjustment for possible confounding factors including the treatment of osteoporosis.IntroductionTo evaluate the associations of multiple vitamin deficiencies on incident fractures, the relationships between serum vitamin markers and incident bone fractures were investigated in Japanese postmenopausal women.MethodsThis analysis used a subset of the ongoing cohort maintained by a primary care institution. Inclusion criteria of the present study were postmenopausal women aged ≥ 50 years, without vitamin supplementation and secondary osteoporosis. Baseline serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC), and homocysteine (Hcy) were measured to assess vitamin D, vitamin K, and vitamin B, respectively. Since 25(OH) D positively relates to vitamin D, ucOC and Hcy negatively relate to vitamin K and vitamin B nutrients, respectively, the subjects with lower (25(OH)D) or higher (ucOC or Hcy) values than each median value was defined as subjects with the corresponding vitamin deficiency. Subjects were divided into four groups according to the number of deficiency: no deficiency, single deficiency, double deficiencies, and triple deficiencies. Relationships between the vitamin deficiencies and incident fractures were evaluated by Cox regression analysis.ResultsA total of 889 subjects were included in this analysis; their mean and SD age was 68.3 ± 9.5 years, and the follow-up period was 6.3 ± 5.1 years. The numbers of subjects in the four groups were 139 (15.6%), 304 (34.2%), 316 (35.5%), and 130 (14.6%) for the groups with no, single, double, and triple deficiencies, respectively. Incident fractures were observed in 264 subjects (29.7%) during the observation period. The number of deficiencies was significantly associated with incident fracture (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.04–1.50, P = 0.018) after adjustment for possible confounding factors including the treatment of osteoporosis.ConclusionAccumulation of vitamin deficiencies was related to incident fractures.

Background/Objectives: Severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder are often accompanied by metabolic comorbidities. While the role of vitamins in physical health is well-established, their involvement in psychiatric disorders has garnered increasing attention in recent years. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1003 patients diagnosed with severe mental illnesses. Vitamin D, B9, and B12 serum levels were measured, and deficiencies were defined using established clinical cutoffs. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify associations between vitamin deficiencies and clinical outcomes. Results: Our findings revealed that vitamin deficiencies were prevalent across all diagnostic groups, with particularly high rates in patients with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. Vitamin D deficiency was significantly associated with worse psychiatric outcomes, including increased depressive symptoms (adjusted OR = 1.89, p = 0.018), lower Global Assessment of Functioning scores (adjusted OR = −0.18, p < 0.001), and higher rates of metabolic syndrome (adjusted OR = 1.97, p = 0.007). Folate and B12 deficiencies were also linked to greater psychiatric symptom severity and metabolic disturbances, including increased risks of obesity and dyslipidemia. Conclusions: Our study highlights the critical role of vitamins deficiencies in both psychiatric and metabolic health of patients with severe mental illnesses. These findings underscore the importance of routine screening and correction of these deficiencies as part of comprehensive care in psychiatric populations. The integration of nutritional interventions may offer a novel and holistic approach to improving both mental and physical health outcomes.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients frequently exhibit vitamin D deficiency and an imbalance in T helper 17 (Th17) and regulatory T (Treg) cells, which may contribute to disease pathogenesis. Preclinical evidence suggests vitamin D regulates Th17/Treg balance, but the therapeutic effects of supplementation in PD remain unestablished. This randomized controlled trial investigated peripheral blood levels of vitamin D, Treg, and Th17 cells in PD patients, examined their associations with clinical outcomes, and assessed vitamin D3 supplementation’s effects on immunological and motor functions. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 51 PD patients and 50 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Thirty PD patients with vitamin D deficiency were randomized to receive vitamin D3 ( n  = 15) or placebo (vegetable oil, n  = 15) for three months. Serum 25(OH)D3 levels were measured by electrochemiluminescence, and Th17/Treg cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Motor and non-motor symptoms were assessed using standardized scales. Vitamin D3 supplementation significantly increased 25(OH)D3 levels ( p  < 0.05), reduced Th17 cells (4.62 ± 1.09 to 3.25 ± 1.14, p  = 0.003), and elevated Tregs (3.25 ± 0.90 to 4.52 ± 0.95, p  = 0.003). Motor function (UPDRS and UPDRS-III) improved in the vitamin D3 group ( p  < 0.001), while no changes were observed in the placebo group. This preliminary study suggests that vitamin D3 supplementation may restore Th17/Treg balance and potentially alleviate motor symptoms in vitamin D-deficient PD patients, indicating a possible therapeutic strategy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT:06539260. Registered 05 August 2024 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06539260 .

Abstract Context Vitamin D is classically recognized as a regulator of calcium and phosphorus metabolism. Recent advances in the measurement of vitamin D metabolites, diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency, and clinical observations have led to an appreciation that along with its role in skeletal metabolism, vitamin D may well have an important role in nonclassical settings. Measurement of the circulating form of vitamin D that best describes total body stores, namely 25-hydroxyvitamin D, can be unreliable despite many sophisticated methodologies that have been proposed and implemented. Likewise, evidence from clinical studies showing a beneficial role of vitamin D in different disease states has been controversial and at times speculative. Moreover, the target concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D to address a number of putative links between vitamin D inadequacy and nonskeletal diseases are further areas of uncertainty. Setting To address these issues, an international conference on “Controversies in Vitamin D” was held in Pisa, Italy, in June 2017. Three main topics were addressed: (i) vitamin D assays and the definition of hypovitaminosis D; (ii) skeletal and extraskeletal effects of vitamin D; (iii) therapeutics of vitamin D. Results This report provides a summary of the deliberations of the expert panels of the conference. Conclusions Despite great advances in our appreciation of vitamin D metabolism, measurements, biological actions on classical and nonclassical tissues, and therapeutics, all of which this report summarizes, much more work remains to be done so that our knowledge base can become even more secure. This summary statement reports the deliberations and conclusions of an international conference on “Controversies in Vitamin D.”

Background/Objectives: Vitamins D and B12 play a crucial role in maintaining bone health, immune function, and neurological integrity. Combined deficiencies in these vitamins can lead to severe health consequences. Current treatment approaches, such as dietary changes and single-vitamin supplementation, often fail to address these deficiencies comprehensively. This study evaluates the effectiveness of concurrent vitamin D and B12 supplementation to correct these insufficiencies. Methods: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial was conducted in Greece from October 2024 to December 2024. Participants aged 20 to 80 years, with insufficient levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (serum < 20 ng/mL) and B12 (serum < 250 ng/L), were eligible for inclusion. Results: A total of 124 patients were randomized into three groups: one receiving vitamins B12 and D in a single supplement (2500 IU + 1000 mcg), one receiving separate doses of each vitamin (2000 IU + 1000 mcg), and a control group receiving no supplementation. The results demonstrated a significant increase in B12 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels among the supplemented groups. Particularly, participants in the combined supplementation group showed higher average serum levels of both vitamins. By the end of this study, 37.1% of those in the combined supplement group achieved adequate vitamin levels, compared to 29.4% in the separate supplementation group. Conclusions: In conclusion, combined supplementation may improve patient adherence and compliance, leading to better health outcomes for individuals with combined vitamins D and B12 deficiencies.