Explore the vast range of titles available.

Wake steering is a form of wind farm control in which turbines use yaw offsets to affect wakes in order to yield an increase in total energy production. In this first phase of a study of wake steering at a commercial wind farm, two turbines implement a schedule of offsets. Results exploring the observed performance of wake steering are presented and some first lessons learned. For two closely spaced turbines, an approximate 14 % increase in energy was measured on the downstream turbine over a 10∘ sector, with a 4 % increase in energy production of the combined upstream–downstream turbine pair. Finally, the influence of atmospheric stability over the results is explored.

Wind farms experience significant power losses due to wake interactions between turbines. Research shows that wake steering can alleviate these losses by redirecting the flow through the farm. However, dynamic closed‐loop implementations of wake steering are rarely presented. We present a model‐free closed‐loop control method using reinforcement learning methodology known as policy gradients in combination with recursive least squares to perform real‐time wake steering in a wind farm. We present dynamic simulations of a four‐turbine wind farm row using HAWC2Farm, implementing the reinforcement learning control method for various inflow conditions and controller configurations. By controlling the three most upstream turbines, mean power gains of 11.6±3.0% and 1.4±0.5% (95% confidence interval) are observed in partial wake and full wake conditions respectively at 7.5% turbulence intensity. The study helps to bridge the gap between theoretical wind farm control and real‐world wind farm systems.

In this paper we present the Serial-Refine method for quickly finding the optimal yaw angles in wake steering. The method optimizes turbine angles serially from upstream to downstream using a small number of candidate angles. The presented results show that Serial-Refine finds solutions that are at least as good as former conventional optimization approaches but that require much less computation time.

Wind farms experience significant efficiency losses due to the aerodynamic interaction between turbines. A possible control technique to minimize these losses is yaw-based wake steering. This paper investigates the potential for improved performance of the Lillgrund wind farm through a detailed calibration of a low-fidelity engineering model aimed specifically at yaw-based wake steering. The importance of each model parameter is assessed through a sensitivity analysis. This work shows that the model is overparameterized as at least one model parameter can be excluded from the calibration. The performance of the calibrated model is tested through an uncertainty analysis, which showed that the model has a significant bias but low uncertainty when comparing the predicted wake losses with measured wake losses. The model is used to optimize the annual energy production of the Lillgrund wind farm by determining yaw angles for specific inflow conditions. A significant energy gain is found when the optimal yaw angles are calculated deterministically. However, the energy gain decreases drastically when uncertainty in input conditions is included. More robust yaw angles can be obtained when the input uncertainty is taken into account during the optimization, which yields an energy gain of approximately 3.4%.

One direction in optimizing wind farm production is reducing wake interactions from upstream turbines. This can be done by optimizing turbine layout as well as optimizing turbine yaw and pitch angles. In particular, wake steering by optimizing yaw angles of wind turbines in farms has received significant attention in recent years. One of the challenges in yaw optimization is developing fast optimization algorithms which can find good solutions in real-time. In this work, we developed a random search algorithm to optimize yaw angles. Optimization was performed on a layout of 39 turbines in a 2 km by 2 km domain. Algorithm specific parameters were tuned for highest solution quality and lowest computational cost. Testing showed that this algorithm can find near-optimal (<1% of best known solutions) solutions consistently over multiple runs, and that quality solutions can be found under 200 iterations. Empirical results show that as wind farm density increases, the potential for yaw optimization increases significantly, and that quality solutions are likely to be plentiful and not unique.

In this paper, wake steering is applied to multirotor turbines to determine whether it has the potential to reduce wind plant wake losses. Through application of rotor yaw to multirotor turbines, a new degree of freedom is introduced to wind farm control such that wakes can be expanded, channelled or redirected to improve inflow conditions for downstream turbines. Five different yaw configurations are investigated (including a baseline case) by employing large‐eddy simulations (LES) to generate a detailed representation of the velocity field downwind of a multirotor wind turbine. Two lower‐fidelity models from single‐rotor yaw studies (curled‐wake model and analytical Gaussian wake model) are extended to the multirotor case, and their results are compared with the LES data. For each model, the wake is analysed primarily by examining wake cross‐sections at different downwind distances. Further quantitative analysis is carried out through characterisations of wake centroids and widths over a range of streamwise locations and through a brief analysis of power production. Most significantly, it is shown that rotor yaw can have a considerable impact on both the distribution and magnitude of the wake velocity deficit, leading to power gains for downstream turbines. The lower‐fidelity models show small deviation from the LES results for specific configurations; however, both are able to reasonably capture the wake trends over a large streamwise range.

Active wake control (AWC) is a strategy for operating wind farms in such a way as to reduce the wake effects on the wind turbines, potentially increasing the overall power production. There are two concepts to AWC: induction control and wake redirection. The former strategy boils down to down-regulating the upstream turbines in order to increase the wind speed in their wakes. This has generally a positive effect on the turbine loading. The wake redirection concept, which relies on intentional yaw misalignment to move wakes away from downstream turbines, has a much more prominent impact and may lead to increased loading. Moreover, the turbines are typically not designed and certified to operate at large yaw misalignments. Even though the potential upsides in terms of power gain are very interesting, the risk for damage or downtime due to increased loading is seen as the main obstacle preventing large scale implementation of this technology. In order to provide good understanding on the impacts of AWC on the turbine loads, this paper presents the results from an in-depth analysis of the fatigue loads on the turbines of an existing wind farm. Even though for some wind turbine components the fatigue loads do increase for some wind conditions under yaw misalignment, it is demonstrated that the wake-induced loading decreases even more so that the lifetime loads under AWC are generally lower.

This paper presents the results of a field campaign investigating the performance of wake steering applied at a section of a commercial wind farm. It is the second phase of the study for which the first phase was reported in . The authors implemented wake steering on two turbine pairs, and compared results with the latest FLORIS (FLOw Redirection and Induction in Steady State) model of wake steering, showing good agreement in overall energy increase. Further, although not the original intention of the study, we also used the results to detect the secondary steering phenomenon. Results show an overall reduction in wake losses of approximately 6.6 % for the regions of operation, which corresponds to achieving roughly half of the static optimal result.

Maximising the power production of wind farms is vital to meet the growing demand for wind energy and reduce its cost. Wake effects, resulting from the aerodynamic interactions between turbines in a wind farm, significantly impact farm efficiency, leading to substantial annual power losses. Wake steering, an influential control strategy, involves mitigating wake effects by strategically yaw misaligning upstream turbines to deflect their wakes. Conventional wake steering approaches typically rely on physics‐based analytical wake models with their parameters often calibrated using higher fidelity data. However, these approaches determine a fixed set of parameters prior to conducting wake steering, neglecting each parameter's dependency on yaw misalignment (i.e. the optimisation variables) exhibited throughout the optimisation process, potentially affecting its accuracy. To address this limitation, this paper introduces a novel data‐driven parameter tuning approach that integrates higher fidelity power measurements using Gaussian processes to continuously adapt parameters in lower fidelity wake models based on the current farm's yaw configuration. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated on a 5×5 $$ 5\\times 5 $$wind farm and a layout corresponding to the Horns Rev wind farm, where various wind directions are investigated. The results reveal that the approach can enable a lower fidelity model to capture more complex physics, thereby improving its accuracy in wake steering optimisation, while maintaining robustness and computational efficiency. This method holds promise for real‐time control applications and can be extended to other control strategies and closed‐loop frameworks.

Wind farm control strategies are being developed to mitigate wake losses in wind farms, increasing energy production. Wake steering is a type of wind farm control in which a wind turbine's yaw position is misaligned from the wind direction, causing its wake to deflect away from downstream turbines. Current modeling tools used to optimize and estimate energy gains from wake steering are designed to represent wakes for fixed wind directions. However, wake steering controllers must operate in dynamic wind conditions and a turbine's yaw position cannot perfectly track changing wind directions. Research has been conducted on robust wake steering control optimized for variable wind directions. In this paper, the design and analysis of a wake steering controller with wind direction variability is presented for a two-turbine array using the FLOw Redirection and Induction in Steady State (FLORIS) control-oriented wake model. First, the authors propose a method for modeling the turbulent and low-frequency components of the wind direction, where the slowly varying wind direction serves as the relevant input to the wake model. Next, we explain a procedure for finding optimal yaw offsets for dynamic wind conditions considering both wind direction and yaw position uncertainty. We then performed simulations with the optimal yaw offsets applied using a realistic yaw offset controller in conjunction with a baseline yaw controller, showing good agreement with the predicted energy gain using the probabilistic model. Using the Gaussian wake model in FLORIS as an example, we compared the performance of yaw offset controllers optimized for static and dynamic wind conditions for different turbine spacings and turbulence intensity values, assuming uniformly distributed wind directions. For a spacing of five rotor diameters and a turbulence intensity of 10 %, robust yaw offsets optimized for variable wind directions yielded an energy gain equivalent to 3.24 % of wake losses recovered, compared to 1.42 % of wake losses recovered with yaw offsets optimized for static wind directions. In general, accounting for wind direction variability in the yaw offset optimization process was found to improve energy production more as the separation distance increased, whereas the relative improvement remained roughly the same for the range of turbulence intensity values considered.