Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
ChatGPT-assisted collaborative argumentation: Effects of role-playing prompts on students' argumentation outcomes, processes, and perceptions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
ChatGPT-assisted collaborative argumentation: Effects of role-playing prompts on students' argumentation outcomes, processes, and perceptions
Do you wish to request the book?
ChatGPT-assisted collaborative argumentation: Effects of role-playing prompts on students' argumentation outcomes, processes, and perceptions
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
ChatGPT-assisted collaborative argumentation: Effects of role-playing prompts on students' argumentation outcomes, processes, and perceptions
2025
Overview
In traditional collaborative argumentation activities, students often struggle to present arguments from diverse perspectives. ChatGPT is capable of understanding user prompts and generating corresponding responses, and it can play different roles with diverse backgrounds to argue with students, creating the possibility of promoting the quality of their argumentation. However, to make ChatGPT's responses work well for argumentation, students need to give appropriate prompts. Therefore, this study proposed the role-playing prompt-based ChatGPT-assisted Collaborative Argumentation (CaCA) approach, and a quasi-experiment was conducted to examine its effects on students' argumentation outcomes, processes, and perceptions. Sixty-six first-year graduate students engaged in this experiment: the experimental group adopted the role-playing prompt-based CaCA approach, while the control group adopted the conventional CaCA approach. Results showed that the role-playing prompt-based CaCA approach broadened students' perspectives in their arguments and increased the connections between data and claims, forming the chain of arguments centered on warrant and backing in their discourse. However, it did not significantly enhance their ability to edit ideas deeply or increase their willingness to give rebuttals. This research provides new insights into the application of ChatGPT in a micro-level collaborative argumentation context.
Publisher
International Forum of Educational Technology ＆ Society,International Forum of Educational Technology & Society, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan,International Forum of Educational Technology & Society
