Paper

Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs

Koroveshi, Xhesika, Pèrigois, Carole, Puecher, Anna, Ricciardone, Angelo, Mapelli, Michela, Goncharov, Boris, Cusin, Giulia, Pieroni, Mauro, Franciolini, Gabriele, Miller, Andrew L, Puppo, Paola, Freise, Andreas, Valerio De Luca, Harms, Jan, Palomba, Cristiano, Loffredo, Eleonora, Pasqualetti, Antonio, Man Leong Chan, Gupta, Pawan Kumar, Piccinni, Ornella Juliana, Gulminelli, Francesca, Maselli, Andrea, Brown, Daniel David, Janquart, Justin, Santoliquido, Filippo, Mondal, Chiranjib, Riotto, Antonio, Alonso, David, Enis Belgacem, Boileau, Guillaume, Heng, Ik Siong, Van Den Broeck, Chris, Dupletsa, Ulyana, Hazra, Nandini, Borhanian, Ssohrab, Hinderer, Tanja, Ronchini, Samuele, Costantino Pacilio, Gupta, Ish, Zhang, Teng, Gemme, Gianluca, Muttoni, Niccolò, Branchesi, Marica, Maggio, Elisa, Iacovelli, Francesco, Mancarella, Michele, Beirnaert, Freija, Degallaix, Jerome, Pani, Paolo, Samajdar, Anuradha, Dhani, Arnab, Steinlechner, Sebastian, Martinovic, Katarina, Narola, Harsh, Foffa, Stefano, Meyers, Patrick, Sakellariadou, Mairi, Utina, Andrei, Li, Yufeng, Kalaghatgi, Chinmay, Badger, Charles, Perego, Albino

2023

Overview

The Einstein Telescope (ET), the European project for a third-generation gravitational-wave detector, has a reference configuration based on a triangular shape consisting of three nested detectors with 10 km arms, where in each arm there is a `xylophone' configuration made of an interferometer tuned toward high frequencies, and an interferometer tuned toward low frequencies and working at cryogenic temperature. Here, we examine the scientific perspectives under possible variations of this reference design. We perform a detailed evaluation of the science case for a single triangular geometry observatory, and we compare it with the results obtained for a network of two L-shaped detectors (either parallel or misaligned) located in Europe, considering different choices of arm-length for both the triangle and the 2L geometries. We also study how the science output changes in the absence of the low-frequency instrument, both for the triangle and the 2L configurations. We examine a broad class of simple `metrics' that quantify the science output, related to compact binary coalescences, multi-messenger astronomy and stochastic backgrounds, and we then examine the impact of different detector designs on a more specific set of scientific objectives.

• Publisher: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
• Subject: Astronomy / Configurations / Cryogenic temperature / Detectors / Gravitational waves / Interferometers / Triangles