Paper

Fetal Brain Tissue Annotation and Segmentation Challenge Results

Joskowicz, Leo, Vilaça, João L, Vercauteren, Tom, Lv Yi, Langs, Georg, Ben-Zvi, Ori, Chen, JinTai, Pei, Yuchen, Hamza Kebiri, Alenyà, Mireia, Wang, Guotai, Qayyum, Abdul, Xu, Daguang, Karimi, Davood, Vasung, Lana, Li, Hongwei, Xu, Yunzhi, Licandro, Roxane, Oliveira, Bruno, Zhang, Zelin, Wu, YiXuan, Payette, Kelly, Menze, Bjoern, Wang, Lisheng, Moona Mazher, Gholipour, Ali, Camara, Oscar, Peng, Ying, Liao Weibin, Puig, Domenec, Villanueva, Maria Inmaculada, Xu, Xinyi, Lucas Fidon, Myronenko, Andriy, Zhang, Huiquan, Avisdris, Netanell, Meritxell Bach Cuadra, Dong, Guiming, Dafna Ben Bashat, Priscille de Dumast, Sobotka, Daniel, Fadida, Bella Specktor, Ji, Hui, Wu, Dan, Liu, Hao, Liao, KuanLun, Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee, Xie, Juanying, Fu, Hao, Zhao, Li, Kim, Donghyeon, Jakab, Andras, Rieu, ZunHyan, Torres, Helena R, Kim, Hyun Gi, Aertsen, Michael, Li, Xuesong, Yang, Lin

2022

Overview

In-utero fetal MRI is emerging as an important tool in the diagnosis and analysis of the developing human brain. Automatic segmentation of the developing fetal brain is a vital step in the quantitative analysis of prenatal neurodevelopment both in the research and clinical context. However, manual segmentation of cerebral structures is time-consuming and prone to error and inter-observer variability. Therefore, we organized the Fetal Tissue Annotation (FeTA) Challenge in 2021 in order to encourage the development of automatic segmentation algorithms on an international level. The challenge utilized FeTA Dataset, an open dataset of fetal brain MRI reconstructions segmented into seven different tissues (external cerebrospinal fluid, grey matter, white matter, ventricles, cerebellum, brainstem, deep grey matter). 20 international teams participated in this challenge, submitting a total of 21 algorithms for evaluation. In this paper, we provide a detailed analysis of the results from both a technical and clinical perspective. All participants relied on deep learning methods, mainly U-Nets, with some variability present in the network architecture, optimization, and image pre- and post-processing. The majority of teams used existing medical imaging deep learning frameworks. The main differences between the submissions were the fine tuning done during training, and the specific pre- and post-processing steps performed. The challenge results showed that almost all submissions performed similarly. Four of the top five teams used ensemble learning methods. However, one team's algorithm performed significantly superior to the other submissions, and consisted of an asymmetrical U-Net network architecture. This paper provides a first of its kind benchmark for future automatic multi-tissue segmentation algorithms for the developing human brain in utero.

• Publisher: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
• Subject: Algorithms / Annotations / Brain / Cerebellum / Cerebrospinal fluid / Computer architecture / Datasets / Deep learning / Image segmentation / Machine learning / Medical imaging / Optimization / Teaching methods / Teams