Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Tis better to choose and lose than to never choose at all
by
Eldad Yechiam
, Nathaniel J. S. Ashby
, Tim Rakow
in
agency
/ Competition
/ Decision making
/ decision strategy
/ decisions-from-experience
/ loss aversion
/ loss avoidance
/ Psychological aspects
/ Psychological research
/ Risk
/ Risk taking
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Tis better to choose and lose than to never choose at all
by
Eldad Yechiam
, Nathaniel J. S. Ashby
, Tim Rakow
in
agency
/ Competition
/ Decision making
/ decision strategy
/ decisions-from-experience
/ loss aversion
/ loss avoidance
/ Psychological aspects
/ Psychological research
/ Risk
/ Risk taking
2017
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Tis better to choose and lose than to never choose at all
by
Eldad Yechiam
, Nathaniel J. S. Ashby
, Tim Rakow
in
agency
/ Competition
/ Decision making
/ decision strategy
/ decisions-from-experience
/ loss aversion
/ loss avoidance
/ Psychological aspects
/ Psychological research
/ Risk
/ Risk taking
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Tis better to choose and lose than to never choose at all
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
When decisions involve opting in or out of competition many decision makers will opt-in even when doing so leads to losses on average. In the current paper, we examine the generality of this effect in risky choices not involving competition. We found that re-framing a sure (certain) zero option as an option to observe the results of the other options without choosing would lead to increased consequential choice (i.e., increased selection of risky options rather than the zero option). Specifically, in two studies we compared the rate of consequential choice in a novel paradigm where decision makers decide to observe or to choose with consequence from a set of risky options (decisions-to-engage) to a full-feedback decisions-from-feedback paradigm where the choice set included a labeled sure zero option. Compared to decisions-from-feedback, participants were more likely to choose from mixed (risky) gambles with consequence (over a zero outcome) in decisions-to-engage. This occurred irrespective of whether doing so was advantageous (i.e., when choice led to monetary gains on average) or disadvantageous (i.e., when choice led to monetary losses on average), and when descriptions of the options outcomes and probabilities were provided (Study 2). These findings provide an important boundary condition for the positive effects of experience on the quality of choice, and suggest that decision makers’ preference for agency can sometimes induce poorer choices.
Publisher
Society for Judgment and Decision Making,Cambridge University Press
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.