Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
被遺忘的權利：比較法之觀察
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
被遺忘的權利：比較法之觀察
Do you wish to request the book?
被遺忘的權利：比較法之觀察
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
被遺忘的權利：比較法之觀察
2015
Overview
網際網路世界牽涉聲譽、隱私及資料保護最重要的挑戰之一即數位記憶無限制之本質，然「當個人的資料在已無正當目的之需要下，本人應有權使其資料不再顯現及加以刪除」，個人資料在網路上被不同之使用者以多樣之方式蒐集、儲存及使用，成為快速流通的客體，也因此，近幾年來，「被遺忘的權利」成為受到關注之焦點。歐盟率先表態在2012年提出，本人在其個人資料已經不再需要被處理或儲存時，應有權要求從網路上刪除，歐盟根據資料保護之原理以承認被遺忘的權利為起點，希冀建構一個隱私普世之權利以適用歐盟所有公民，並提供個人就其於網路上之身分及聲譽重要之自主性，該權利源自於既存歐洲之隱私法，隱私乃歐洲人權公約賦予之基本權利而長久受到歐洲國家所實踐，被遺忘的權利彰顯了一種社會價值，作為資料隱私庇護之權利，乃民主之前提以參與社會生活及公共論壇，亦能免於社會之羞辱及公眾或私人之監視，然而上開歐盟之提議在美國卻受到負面之批評，因被遺忘的權利確實與言論自由可能出現扞格，在歐盟及美國間背後長久之文化及哲學思維存在地域差異性下，如何調和以獲致利益平衡，應為未來當努力之課題。
Publisher
東吳大學法學院
Subject
/ General Data Protection Regulation
/ informational self-determination
/ TSSCI
/ 利益平衡
/ 新聞自由
/ 被遺忘的權利
/ 言論自由
/ 資料保護
/ 資訊自決
/ 隱私權
