Journal Article

125  Towards an optimal multiple sclerosis patient case-load for a full-time MSologist

Hobart, Jeremy, Bateman, Karen, Mazibrada, Gordon, Giovannoni, Gavin, Marta, Monica

2022

Overview

IntroductionStrategy, evidence and anticipation should underpin workforce-planning.AimTo estimate a sustainable patient-caseload (PCL) for a full-time equivalent MS specialist neurologist (FTE-MSologist).MethodsHypothetically, an FTE-MSologist refers to 10-MSology-related programmed activities per week. We considered three service models (core, aspirational, alternative/DGH) with differing frequency, duration and content of patient consultations and monitoring. We computed the ideal number of new patients and existing patients, for each scenario, from detailed qualitative interviews with 4 MSologists at different NHS Trusts. Computations assumed all 3 scenarios had common support from MS nurses (@315 PLwMS/FTE MS nurse), MS coordinators, neuroradiology, neuropharmacist and administration.ResultsEstimates for 1-FTE-MSologist/year/service model were: Core: new-PCL=81 (range=46–115); existing- PCL=798 (range=672–923). Aspirational: new-PCL=21 (range=28–69); existing-PCL=481 (range=401–561). Alternative/DGH: new-PCL=89 (range=51–126); existing-PCL=874 (range=733–1015).ConclusionsThese MS PCL/FTE-MSologist estimates enable future NHS manpower planning to optimally staff specialist MS services. It is notable that few (if any) UK MS services have the support considered pre- requisite. Much of the direct clinical care work undertaken is “unseen” and not formally job-planned. These results have significant implications formal time and motion studies may be required to improve estimates’ accuracy.Support.Karen Bateman was supported by Novartis. Disclosures: See poster [e-mail]

• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd,BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subject: ABN Abstracts 2021 / Estimates / Multiple sclerosis