Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
PR034/#973 Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparoscopy for the treatment of apparent early stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
PR034/#973 Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparoscopy for the treatment of apparent early stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus
Do you wish to request the book?
PR034/#973 Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparoscopy for the treatment of apparent early stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
PR034/#973 Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparoscopy for the treatment of apparent early stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus
2023
Overview
IntroductionTo compare long-term oncologic outcomes in women with apparent uterine confined (or early-stage) endometrioid endometrial cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgical (MIS) staging with or without robotic assistance (RA).MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with apparent early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer diagnosed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between January 2008 and January 2018. Clinicopathologic, surgical, and survival data were collected. Appropriate statistical methods were applied.ResultsOf 1728 patients, 1389 (80.4%) underwent RA-laparoscopy, and 339 (19.6%) laparoscopy. Median age at diagnosis was 60 years, range (24–92), median body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis was 30.2 kg/m2, range (15.1–71.2). Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were similar in the two groups. Perioperative complications were similar in both groups (9.9% vs 7.7%, p=0.2). A higher proportion of patients in the RA group were discharged on day 0 (19.2% v 5.3%, p<0.001). Median follow-up was similar in the RA vs. laparoscopy group (55.7 months vs 52.9 months, p=0.37). Comparing the RA and laparoscopic groups, the recurrence rate (9.5% vs. 7.4%, p=0.22), 5-year progression-free survival (88.5% vs. 90%, p=0.38), and 5-year overall survival (89% v 89%, p=0.74) were not significantly different.Conclusion/ImplicationsIn apparent early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancers, surgical staging using RA-laparoscopy was not associated with any significant increase in adverse survival outcomes compared to laparoscopy.
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd,Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
