MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
950 Sensitivity and false negativity of SLN frozen sectionhistological evaluation in the sentix trial (CEEGOG-CX01; ENGOT-CX2; NCT02494063)
950 Sensitivity and false negativity of SLN frozen sectionhistological evaluation in the sentix trial (CEEGOG-CX01; ENGOT-CX2; NCT02494063)
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
950 Sensitivity and false negativity of SLN frozen sectionhistological evaluation in the sentix trial (CEEGOG-CX01; ENGOT-CX2; NCT02494063)
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
950 Sensitivity and false negativity of SLN frozen sectionhistological evaluation in the sentix trial (CEEGOG-CX01; ENGOT-CX2; NCT02494063)
950 Sensitivity and false negativity of SLN frozen sectionhistological evaluation in the sentix trial (CEEGOG-CX01; ENGOT-CX2; NCT02494063)

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
950 Sensitivity and false negativity of SLN frozen sectionhistological evaluation in the sentix trial (CEEGOG-CX01; ENGOT-CX2; NCT02494063)
950 Sensitivity and false negativity of SLN frozen sectionhistological evaluation in the sentix trial (CEEGOG-CX01; ENGOT-CX2; NCT02494063)
Journal Article

950 Sensitivity and false negativity of SLN frozen sectionhistological evaluation in the sentix trial (CEEGOG-CX01; ENGOT-CX2; NCT02494063)

2021
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Introduction/Background*SENTIX is a prospective cohort multicentric international study on sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. SLN frozen section (FS) and pathological ultrastaging were mandatory by the protocol. Samples from SLN were reviewed centrally for pathological assessment quality control. Only sites experienced in SLN biopsy technique could join the trial.MethodologyIn total, 47 sites from 18 countries participated in the trial. Patients with FIGO 2009 stages T1A1/LVSI+ – T1B1 (<4 cm or ≤ 2 cm for fertility sparing), with common tumour types and no suspicious lymph nodes on imaging were registered in the trial. Patients remained in the trial after the surgery if SLN were detected on both sides of the pelvis and if SLN were negative on FS histological evaluation. Blue dye, radioactive tracer, indocyanine green or their combinations were all eligible tracers for SLN detection. Intraoperative SLN pathological processing consisted of SLN examination in one randomly selected slice. SLN ultrastaging protocol included a complete processing of all SLN tissue in slices of 2 mm thickness, 2 sections in 150 μm from each block until no tissue left, one stained with H&E and second examined immunohistochemically.Result(s)*Altogether 733 patients were registered until Sentix enrolment closure in October 2020, 83 patients were excluded (table 1) and 650 patients was analysed. Patients` characteristics are shown in table 1. Bilateral SLN detection rate reached 95%. FS detected macrometastases (MAC) in 44 cases and micrometastasis (MIC) in 4 cases. SLN ultrastaging found additional 9 cases with MAC, 26 with micrometastases (MIC) and all 19 cases with isolated tumor cells (ITC). Sensitivity of FS was 83.0% for the detection of MAC, 57.8% for pN1 status (MAC or MIC) and 47.1% for any type of SLN involvement (MAC, MIC, ITC). Table 2.Abstract 950 Table 1Patient’s characteristics (N=733)Abstract 950 Table 2SLN status assessed by frozen section and final ultastaging (N=650)Conclusion*High bilateral detection rate of 95% was achieved in Sentix sites experienced in the SLN biopsy technique. Intraoperative pathological assessment of SLN failed to detect majority of MIC (86.7%), all cases with ITC and 42.2% with pN1 (MIC or MAC).
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd,Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited