Journal Article

P100 Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in a single tablet regimen in initial HIV-1 therapy

DeJesus, Edwin, Wohl, David, Callebaut, Christian, McCallister, Scott, Podzamczer, Daniel, Molina, Jean Michel, Martin, Hal, Crofoot, Gordon, Pozniak, Anton, Thompson, Melanie

2015

Overview

Background Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a novel tenofovir (TFV) prodrug that, when administered in the single tablet regimen E/C/F/TAF, has >90% lower plasma TFV levels compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Methods Treatment naïve HIV-1+ adults were randomised 1:1 to receive a regimen of E/C/F/TAF or E/C/F/TDF in two Phase 3 double blind studies. Primary endpoint was Week 48 virologic response by FDA Snapshot algorithm in a pre-specified combined analysis. Results 1,733 subjects were randomised and treated: 15% women, 43% non-White, 23% viral load ≥100,000 copies/mL. The primary objective was met, E/C/F/TAF was non-inferior to E/C/F/TDF with 92% and 90%, respectively having HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48 (difference +2%, 95% CI -0.7% to +4.7%, p = 0.13). Virologic failure with resistance occurred in 0.8% in the E/C/F/TAF arm and 0.6% on E/C/F/TDF. Treatment related SAEs were rare: E/C/F/TAF 0.3% (n = 3), E/C/F/TDF 0.2% (n = 2). There were no reports of proximal renal tubulopathy in either arm. No single AE led to discontinuation of more than 1 subject on E/C/F/TAF. Grade 2, to 4 AEs occurring in ≥ 2% were: diarrhoea (3.3% vs. 2.5%), nausea (2.2% vs. 2.0%), headache (2.9% vs. 2.1%), and URI (3.6% vs. 3.1%) in the E/C/F/TAF vs. E/C/F/TDF arms. Conclusions Through 48 weeks of treatment, high virologic response rates were seen in patients receiving E/C/F/TAF or E/C/F/TDF. Both regimens were well tolerated, and no unique AEs associated with TAF occurred. These data support the use of E/C/F/TAF, as a potential regimen for initial treatment of patients with HIV-1 infection.

• Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group LTD