Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Islam Is Not a \Religion\ - Global Religious History and Early Twentieth-Century Debates in British Malaya
by
Maltese, Giovanni
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Islam Is Not a \Religion\ - Global Religious History and Early Twentieth-Century Debates in British Malaya
by
Maltese, Giovanni
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Islam Is Not a \Religion\ - Global Religious History and Early Twentieth-Century Debates in British Malaya
Journal Article
Islam Is Not a \Religion\ - Global Religious History and Early Twentieth-Century Debates in British Malaya
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Abstract
Lately, Islamicists have called to discard \"religion\" as a conceptual tool and/or to use the \"Qurʾānic term\" dīn instead, arguing that \"religion\" entails Eurocentric bias. Analyzing how Fazl-ur-Rahman Ansari conceptualized Islam and religion in the late 1930s and early 1940s, this article presents a threefold argument. Firstly, I argue that a global history approach which examines in a poststructuralist framework how \"Islam\" and \"religion\" are used in concrete contexts is better suited to address the problem of Eurocentrism in both Religious Studies and Islamic Studies. Secondly, I challenge the scholarly thesis that twentieth-century Southeast Asian intellectual debates which referred to Islam as religion were mere emulators of debates conducted in the \"West.\" Instead of assuming isolated histories and ignoring Southeast Asian debates, I contend that the current use of and debates about conceptualizations of Islam as/and religion are the product of one and the same discourse - a result of global negotiation processes in which Europeans were as involved as Southeast Asia-based non-Europeans, even if they did not speak from the same position of power. Finally, I submit that the approach of global religious history opens new perspectives on contemporary Malaysian politics.
Publisher
Brill
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.