MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Efficacy and safety of CatchView Mini stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in proximal and distal medium vessel occlusions
Efficacy and safety of CatchView Mini stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in proximal and distal medium vessel occlusions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Efficacy and safety of CatchView Mini stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in proximal and distal medium vessel occlusions
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Efficacy and safety of CatchView Mini stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in proximal and distal medium vessel occlusions
Efficacy and safety of CatchView Mini stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in proximal and distal medium vessel occlusions

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Efficacy and safety of CatchView Mini stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in proximal and distal medium vessel occlusions
Efficacy and safety of CatchView Mini stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in proximal and distal medium vessel occlusions
Journal Article

Efficacy and safety of CatchView Mini stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in proximal and distal medium vessel occlusions

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundMedium vessel occlusion (MVO) mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has shown promising outcomes and safety profiles, comparable to those of large vessel occlusion thrombectomy.ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of the CatchView Mini (CVM) stent retriever (Balt, Montmorency, France) in patients with acute stroke with proximal and distal MVO (pMVO vs dMVO), respectively.MethodsWe analyzed retrospective data of consecutive patients with MVO who underwent MT with the CVM stent retriever. We categorized occlusions into pMVO group (segments A1, M2, and P1) versus dMVO group (segments A2, A3, M3, P2, and P3). Demographic, clinical, angiographic, and clinical outcome data (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months) were compared. The first pass effect (FPE) was defined as that which achieved modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2c–3 after a single device pass.ResultsA total of 196 patients were included (44.3% female, median (IQR) age 74 (67–84) years), of whom 151 (77%) had pMVO and 45 (23%) dMVO. FPE was achieved in 108 (55.1%) patients, and final successful reperfusion (mTICI 2c–3) was attained in 156 (79.6%) cases, with up to two passes in 78% of patients. Rescue MT was performed in 24 (12.2%) patients. The dMVO group had a higher FPE rate (84.4% vs 46.3%; P<0.001), fewer number of passes, and lower symptomatic hemorrhage rate (0% vs 0.6%; P=0.009) than the pMVO group. Around 75% of patients in both groups achieved similar favorable outcomes (mRS score 0–2) at 3 months.ConclusionsThe CVM device appears effective and safe for pMVO and dMVO thrombectomy.
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group LTD