Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Response of Copepods To Hydromechanical Stimuli
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Response of Copepods To Hydromechanical Stimuli
Do you wish to request the book?
Response of Copepods To Hydromechanical Stimuli
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Response of Copepods To Hydromechanical Stimuli
1996
Overview
Diaptomus minutus Lilljeborg, 1889, and Cyclops scutifer Sars, 1863, detected the hydromechanical signals created by small moving spheres of sizes comparable to those of most crustacean zooplankters (∼ 1 mm). The number of escapes and escape distance were affected by the size, location, and direction of movement of the spheres. Ability to detected and flee from the moving spheres was not significantly affected by ambient turbulence. The herbivorous D. minutus escaped from all hydromechanical signals. The predaceous Cyclops scutifer showed higher escape probability from large signals and occasionally recognized small signals as prey. /// Diaptomus minutus Lilljeborg, 1889 et Cyclops scutifer Sars, 1863 ont détecté les signaux hydromécaniques créés par des petites sphères mobiles de tailes comparables à celles de la plupart des crustacés zooplanctoniques (∼ 1 mm). Le nombre d'échappées et la distance d'échappée étaient affectés par la taille, la localisation et la direction de mouvement des sphères. La capacité de détecter et de fuir les sphères mouvantes n'était pas affectée de façon sigificative par la turbulence ambiante. L'herbivore Diaptomus minutus fuyait tous les signaux hydromécaniques. Le prédateur Cyclops scutifer manifestait la plus haute probabilité d'échappée aux grands signaux et, occasionnellement, reconnaissait les petits signaux comme des proies.
Publisher
Brill,BRILL,E. J. Brill
Subject
