Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Traditional Criteria for Observation of Splenic Trauma Should be Challenged
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Traditional Criteria for Observation of Splenic Trauma Should be Challenged
Do you wish to request the book?
Traditional Criteria for Observation of Splenic Trauma Should be Challenged
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Traditional Criteria for Observation of Splenic Trauma Should be Challenged
1999
Overview
Age less than 55 years, normal Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and absence of hypotension are traditional criteria for the selection of adult patients with blunt splenic trauma for observation. The objective of this study is to challenge these criteria. Two hundred twelve patients who presented with blunt splenic injury between 1992 and 1997 were identified from the Trauma Registry at our Level I trauma center. The patients were divided into three groups: 100 patients (47%) were observed, 108 (51%) underwent immediate splenorrhaphy or splenectomy, and 4 (2%) failed observation. The three groups were compared by participants’ ages, GCSs, and histories of hypotension. No statistical differences were noted between the successfully observed patients and those requiring immediate surgery with respect to these criteria. Of the 4 patients who failed observation, all were younger than 55 years, all had a GCS >12, and all were normotensive. Our findings suggest that traditional criteria used to select patients for splenic trauma observation are not absolute indicators and should be liberalized: patients can be successfully observed despite having criteria that, in the past, would have led to immediate operative intervention.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Southeastern Surgical Congress
Subject
Biological and medical sciences
/ Humans
/ Injuries of the abdomen. Foreign bodies of the digestive system
/ Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen
/ Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
/ Surgery of the digestive system
