Journal Article

PHOENIX (Picking up Hidden Osteoporosis Effectively during Normal CT Imaging without additional X-rays): protocol for a randomised, multicentre feasibility study

Poole, Kenneth E S, Fleming, Jane, Willoughby, Karen, Turmezei, Thomas D, Chappell, Daniel D G, Wagner, Adam P, Kaptoge, Stephen K, Clark, Emma, Shepstone, Lee

2022

Overview

IntroductionTwo million out of the UK’s 5 million routine diagnostic CT scans performed each year incorporate the thoracolumbar spine or pelvic region. Up to one-third reveal undiagnosed osteoporosis or vertebral fractures. We developed an intervention, Picking up Hidden Osteoporosis Effectively during Normal CT Imaging without additional X-rays (‘PHOENIX’), to facilitate early detection and management of osteoporosis in people attending hospitals for CT scans.Methods and analysisA multicentre, randomised, pragmatic feasibility study. From the general CT-attending population, women aged ≥65 years and men aged ≥75 years attending for CT scans are invited to participate, via a novel consent form incorporating Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) questions. Those at increased 10-year risk (within the amber or red zones of the UK FRAX graphical outputs for further action) are block randomised (1:1:1) to (1) PHOENIX intervention, (2) active control or (3) usual care. The PHOENIX intervention comprises (i) retrieving the CT scans using the NHS Image Exchange Portal, (ii) Mindways QCT Pro software analysis of CT hip and spine none density with CT vertebral fracture assessment, (iii) sending the participants’ general practitioner (GP) a clinical report including diagnosis, necessary investigations and recommended treatment. Baseline CT scans from groups 2 and 3 are assessed with the PHOENIX intervention only at study end. Assuming 25% attrition, the study is powered to find a predicted superior osteoporosis treatment rate with PHOENIX (20%) vs 16% among patients whose GPs were sent the FRAX questionnaire only (active control) and 5% in the usual care group. Five hospitals are participating to determine feasibility. The co-primary feasibility outcome measures are (a) ability to randomise 375 patients within 10 months and (b) retention of 75% of survivors, completing their 1-year bone health outcome questionnaire. Secondary 1-year outcomes include osteoporosis/vertebral fracture identification rates and osteoporosis treatment rates. Stakeholder acceptability and economic aspects are evaluated.Ethics and disseminationApproved by committee (National Research Ethics Service) East of England (EE) as REF/19/EE/0176. Dissemination will be through the Royal Osteoporosis Society (to patients and public) as well as to clinician peers via national and international bone/rheumatology scientific and clinical meetings.Trial registration number ISRCTN14722819.

• Publisher: British Medical Journal Publishing Group,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
• Subject: back pain / Bone density / bone diseases / computed tomography / diagnostic radiology / Feasibility Studies / Female / Humans / Male / Medical diagnosis / Medical imaging / Multicenter Studies as Topic / Osteoporosis / Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging / Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging / Osteoporotic Fractures - prevention & control / Radiology and Imaging / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / rheumatology / Software / Spinal Fractures / spine / Tomography, X-Ray Computed / X-Rays