Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
External validation of the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in a Dutch fast-track clinic
by
Vermeer, Marloes
, Brouwer, Elisabeth
, van Nieuwland, Marieke
, van Bon, Lenny
, Alves, Celina
in
Biopsy
/ Classification
/ Clinical medicine
/ Cohort analysis
/ Decades
/ Epidemiology
/ Giant Cell Arteritis
/ Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis
/ Humans
/ Medical imaging
/ Patients
/ Prospective Studies
/ Rheumatology
/ ROC Curve
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Systemic vasculitis
/ Temporal Arteries
/ Tomography
/ Ultrasonic imaging
/ Validation studies
/ Variables
/ Vasculitis
/ Vein & artery diseases
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
External validation of the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in a Dutch fast-track clinic
by
Vermeer, Marloes
, Brouwer, Elisabeth
, van Nieuwland, Marieke
, van Bon, Lenny
, Alves, Celina
in
Biopsy
/ Classification
/ Clinical medicine
/ Cohort analysis
/ Decades
/ Epidemiology
/ Giant Cell Arteritis
/ Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis
/ Humans
/ Medical imaging
/ Patients
/ Prospective Studies
/ Rheumatology
/ ROC Curve
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Systemic vasculitis
/ Temporal Arteries
/ Tomography
/ Ultrasonic imaging
/ Validation studies
/ Variables
/ Vasculitis
/ Vein & artery diseases
2023
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
External validation of the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in a Dutch fast-track clinic
by
Vermeer, Marloes
, Brouwer, Elisabeth
, van Nieuwland, Marieke
, van Bon, Lenny
, Alves, Celina
in
Biopsy
/ Classification
/ Clinical medicine
/ Cohort analysis
/ Decades
/ Epidemiology
/ Giant Cell Arteritis
/ Giant Cell Arteritis - diagnosis
/ Humans
/ Medical imaging
/ Patients
/ Prospective Studies
/ Rheumatology
/ ROC Curve
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Systemic vasculitis
/ Temporal Arteries
/ Tomography
/ Ultrasonic imaging
/ Validation studies
/ Variables
/ Vasculitis
/ Vein & artery diseases
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
External validation of the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in a Dutch fast-track clinic
Journal Article
External validation of the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in a Dutch fast-track clinic
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ObjectiveRecently the Diagnostic and Classification Criteria in Vasculitis Study group developed and published new American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis (GCA). To test robustness in a different clinical setting and inform clinicians on performance in clinical practice, we aim to externally validate them in patients with a suspicion of GCA referred to our GCA fast-track clinic.MethodsPatients with suspected GCA from the Hospital Group Twente Early GCA in Twente prospective cohort were included. The clinical diagnosis of GCA verified after 6 months of follow-up made by the treating rheumatologist was used as a reference standard. A cut-off score of ≥6 was tested as described in the original article. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, sensitivity and specificity were calculated.ResultsIn total, 133 patients with suspected GCA were included, of whom 53 were diagnosed with GCA and 80 patients were not diagnosed with GCA. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.98). Using the proposed cut-off score of≥6, we found that sensitivity was 98.0% (95% CI 89.9% to 100%) and specificity was 57.5% (95% CI 45.9% to 68.5%). The majority of misclassified patients without GCA had classification scores of 6 and 7 as clinical and/or laboratory criteria were often present in our non-GCA population.ConclusionOur results showed an excellent AUC and sensitivity with a moderate specificity for classification of GCA patients. Considering our relevant study population, we found that the new classification criteria might also be useful for diagnostic purposes, albeit with careful interpretation.
Publisher
EULAR,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.