Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Impact of short-term reconstructive surgical missions: a systematic review
by
Botman, Matthijs
, Mullender, Margriet G.
, Nuwass, Emanuel Q.
, Winters, Henri A.H.
, Ket, Johannes C.F.
, Gerretsen, Barend
, Marck, Klaas W.
, Hendriks, Thom C.C.
, Rahmee, Charissa N.S.
in
Accountability
/ Burn treatment
/ burns
/ Cost analysis
/ disease
/ disorder
/ Global health
/ Hospitals
/ injury
/ Low income areas
/ other infection
/ Patient safety
/ Public health
/ Surgery
/ Surgical outcomes
/ Sustainability
/ Systematic review
/ treatment
/ Underserved populations
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Impact of short-term reconstructive surgical missions: a systematic review
by
Botman, Matthijs
, Mullender, Margriet G.
, Nuwass, Emanuel Q.
, Winters, Henri A.H.
, Ket, Johannes C.F.
, Gerretsen, Barend
, Marck, Klaas W.
, Hendriks, Thom C.C.
, Rahmee, Charissa N.S.
in
Accountability
/ Burn treatment
/ burns
/ Cost analysis
/ disease
/ disorder
/ Global health
/ Hospitals
/ injury
/ Low income areas
/ other infection
/ Patient safety
/ Public health
/ Surgery
/ Surgical outcomes
/ Sustainability
/ Systematic review
/ treatment
/ Underserved populations
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Impact of short-term reconstructive surgical missions: a systematic review
by
Botman, Matthijs
, Mullender, Margriet G.
, Nuwass, Emanuel Q.
, Winters, Henri A.H.
, Ket, Johannes C.F.
, Gerretsen, Barend
, Marck, Klaas W.
, Hendriks, Thom C.C.
, Rahmee, Charissa N.S.
in
Accountability
/ Burn treatment
/ burns
/ Cost analysis
/ disease
/ disorder
/ Global health
/ Hospitals
/ injury
/ Low income areas
/ other infection
/ Patient safety
/ Public health
/ Surgery
/ Surgical outcomes
/ Sustainability
/ Systematic review
/ treatment
/ Underserved populations
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Impact of short-term reconstructive surgical missions: a systematic review
Journal Article
Impact of short-term reconstructive surgical missions: a systematic review
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
IntroductionShort-term missions providing patients in low-income countries with reconstructive surgery are often criticised because evidence of their value is lacking. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of short-term reconstructive surgical missions in low-income and middle-income countries.MethodsA systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched five medical databases from inception up to 2 July 2018. Original studies of short-term reconstructive surgical missions were included, which reported data on patient safety measurements, health gains of individual patients and sustainability. Data were combined to generate overall outcomes, including overall complication rates.ResultsOf 1662 identified studies, 41 met full inclusion criteria, which included 48 546 patients. The overall study quality according to Oxford CEBM and GRADE was low. Ten studies reported a minimum of 6 months’ follow-up, showing a follow-up rate of 56.0% and a complication rate of 22.3%. Twelve studies that did not report on duration or follow-up rate reported a complication rate of 1.2%. Fifteen out of 20 studies (75%) that reported on follow-up also reported on sustainable characteristics.ConclusionsEvidence on the patient outcomes of reconstructive surgical missions is scarce and of limited quality. Higher complication rates were reported in studies which explicitly mentioned the duration and rate of follow-up. Studies with a low follow-up quality might be under-reporting complication rates and overestimating the positive impact of missions. This review indicates that missions should develop towards sustainable partnerships. These partnerships should provide quality aftercare, perform outcome research and build the surgical capacity of local healthcare systems.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018099285.
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd,BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.