MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison between a Photo-Acoustic Analyzer System (PAS) and Gas Chromatograph (GC) for Measuring CO2 and N2O Emissions in a Corn/Soybean Field
Comparison between a Photo-Acoustic Analyzer System (PAS) and Gas Chromatograph (GC) for Measuring CO2 and N2O Emissions in a Corn/Soybean Field
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison between a Photo-Acoustic Analyzer System (PAS) and Gas Chromatograph (GC) for Measuring CO2 and N2O Emissions in a Corn/Soybean Field
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison between a Photo-Acoustic Analyzer System (PAS) and Gas Chromatograph (GC) for Measuring CO2 and N2O Emissions in a Corn/Soybean Field
Comparison between a Photo-Acoustic Analyzer System (PAS) and Gas Chromatograph (GC) for Measuring CO2 and N2O Emissions in a Corn/Soybean Field

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison between a Photo-Acoustic Analyzer System (PAS) and Gas Chromatograph (GC) for Measuring CO2 and N2O Emissions in a Corn/Soybean Field
Comparison between a Photo-Acoustic Analyzer System (PAS) and Gas Chromatograph (GC) for Measuring CO2 and N2O Emissions in a Corn/Soybean Field
Journal Article

Comparison between a Photo-Acoustic Analyzer System (PAS) and Gas Chromatograph (GC) for Measuring CO2 and N2O Emissions in a Corn/Soybean Field

2018
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
There is a need to compare greenhouse gases (GHGs) measurements methods for data harmonization. The objective of this study was to compare Gas Chromatography (GC) and a Photo-Acoustic Analyzer System (PAS) as methods for measuring carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in a corn/soybean field. The study was conducted on a Waldron silt loam soil at Freeman farm of Lincoln University of Missouri. Sixteen cylindrical polyvinylchloride static chambers measuring 0.30 m in height and 0.20 m in diameter were permanently inserted into the soil to a depth of 0.05 m for GHGs measurements. Soil air samples were collected in each chamber with a 60 ml syringe and stored in a Tedlar bag for CO2 and N2O analysis by GC within 2 hours of sampling. CO2 and N2O measurements with PAS were done directly in-situ. Significant, stronger and positive correlations were found between PAS and GC in 11 out of 15 months - measurement cycles for CO2. The most significant correlation was observed in April 2015 (r = 0.90, p = 0.0001). For N2O, however, only 5 out of 15 measurements between PAS and GC had positive, but weak correlations. The highest correlation between PAS and GC measurements for N2O was also found in April 2015 (r = 0.71, p = 0.0020). Continuous monitoring of GHGs emissions is necessary to better understand their dynamics and how they are exacerbated by agricultural management practices. However, accurate measurement techniques are also needed.
Publisher
Kansas Academy of Science