Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
by
Hyde, M J
, Modi, N
, Gale, C
in
Babies
/ Blood Specimen Collection - ethics
/ Blood transfusions
/ Clinical decision making
/ Clinical trials
/ Comparative Effectiveness Research - ethics
/ Data acquisition
/ Decision making
/ Erythrocyte Transfusion - ethics
/ Erythrocyte Transfusion - methods
/ Ethics
/ Health services
/ Humans
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy
/ Informed consent
/ Medical research
/ Neonatology - ethics
/ Newborn babies
/ Original
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - ethics
/ Regulation
/ Research ethics
/ Review boards
/ Risk Assessment
/ Risk Factors
/ Therapeutic Human Experimentation - ethics
/ United Kingdom
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
by
Hyde, M J
, Modi, N
, Gale, C
in
Babies
/ Blood Specimen Collection - ethics
/ Blood transfusions
/ Clinical decision making
/ Clinical trials
/ Comparative Effectiveness Research - ethics
/ Data acquisition
/ Decision making
/ Erythrocyte Transfusion - ethics
/ Erythrocyte Transfusion - methods
/ Ethics
/ Health services
/ Humans
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy
/ Informed consent
/ Medical research
/ Neonatology - ethics
/ Newborn babies
/ Original
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - ethics
/ Regulation
/ Research ethics
/ Review boards
/ Risk Assessment
/ Risk Factors
/ Therapeutic Human Experimentation - ethics
/ United Kingdom
2017
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
by
Hyde, M J
, Modi, N
, Gale, C
in
Babies
/ Blood Specimen Collection - ethics
/ Blood transfusions
/ Clinical decision making
/ Clinical trials
/ Comparative Effectiveness Research - ethics
/ Data acquisition
/ Decision making
/ Erythrocyte Transfusion - ethics
/ Erythrocyte Transfusion - methods
/ Ethics
/ Health services
/ Humans
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy
/ Informed consent
/ Medical research
/ Neonatology - ethics
/ Newborn babies
/ Original
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - ethics
/ Regulation
/ Research ethics
/ Review boards
/ Risk Assessment
/ Risk Factors
/ Therapeutic Human Experimentation - ethics
/ United Kingdom
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
Journal Article
Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ObjectiveRandomised controlled trials, a gold-standard approach to reduce uncertainties in clinical practice, are growing in cost and are often slow to recruit. We determined whether methodological approaches to facilitate large, efficient clinical trials were acceptable to UK research ethics committees (RECs).DesignWe developed a protocol in collaboration with parents, for a comparative-effectiveness, randomised controlled trial comparing two widely used blood transfusion practices in preterm infants. We incorporated four approaches to improve recruitment and efficiency: (i) point-of-care design using electronic patient records for patient identification, randomisation and data acquisition, (ii) short two-page information sheet; (iii) explicit mention of possible inclusion benefit; (iv) opt-out consent with enrolment as the default. With the support of the UK Health Research Authority, we submitted an identical protocol to 12 UK REC.SettingRECs in the UK.Main outcomeNumber of REC granting favourable opinions.ResultsThe use of electronic patient records was acceptable to all RECs; one REC raised concerns about the short parent information sheet, 10 about inclusion benefit and 9 about opt-out consent. Following responses to queries, nine RECs granted a favourable final opinion and three rejected the application because they considered the opt-out consent process invalid.ConclusionsA majority of RECs in this study consider the use of electronic patient record data, short information sheets, opt-out consent and mention of possible inclusion benefit to be acceptable in neonatal comparative-effectiveness research. We identified a need for guidance for RECs in relation to opt-out consent processes. These methods provide opportunity to facilitate large randomised controlled trials.
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group LTD,BMJ Publishing Group
Subject
/ Blood Specimen Collection - ethics
/ Comparative Effectiveness Research - ethics
/ Erythrocyte Transfusion - ethics
/ Erythrocyte Transfusion - methods
/ Ethics
/ Humans
/ Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy
/ Original
/ Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - ethics
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.