Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The experimental design and data interpretation in Unexpected mutations after CRISPR Cas9 editing in vivo by Schaefer et al. are insufficient to support the conclusions drawn by the authors
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The experimental design and data interpretation in Unexpected mutations after CRISPR Cas9 editing in vivo by Schaefer et al. are insufficient to support the conclusions drawn by the authors
Do you wish to request the book?
The experimental design and data interpretation in Unexpected mutations after CRISPR Cas9 editing in vivo by Schaefer et al. are insufficient to support the conclusions drawn by the authors
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Paper
The experimental design and data interpretation in Unexpected mutations after CRISPR Cas9 editing in vivo by Schaefer et al. are insufficient to support the conclusions drawn by the authors
2017
Overview
The recent correspondence to the Editor of Nature Methods by Schaefer et. al. has garnered significant attention since its publication as a result of its strong conclusions contradicting numerous publications in the field using similar analytical approaches and methods. The authors suggest that the CRISPR-Cas9 system is highly mutagenic in genomic regions not expected to be targeted by the gRNA. Based on experimental design and a re-analysis of the primary data, we believe that the conclusions drawn from this study are unsubstantiated by the disclosed experiments as they were designed and carried out. Further, it is impossible to ascribe the observed differences in the subject mice to the effects of CRISPR per se. The genetic differences seen in this comparative analysis were likely present prior to editing with CRISPR.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Subject
