Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Social Equity: A Study of Politics, Management, and the Equal Protection of the Law
by
McCandless, Sean Andrew
in
Public administration
/ Public policy
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Social Equity: A Study of Politics, Management, and the Equal Protection of the Law
by
McCandless, Sean Andrew
in
Public administration
/ Public policy
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Social Equity: A Study of Politics, Management, and the Equal Protection of the Law
Dissertation
Social Equity: A Study of Politics, Management, and the Equal Protection of the Law
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Social equity, a pillar of public administration alongside efficiency, effectiveness, and economy, is one of the least understood and studied concepts in the literature. There is a dearth of research despite the importance of understanding how public administration and public policy differentially affect groups, particularly minorities. To scholars like Gooden (2015a), research is needed on several questions: “What is the extent of inequity”, “Why does inequity persist”, and “How do public agencies achieve accountability for social equity”. However, numerous calls for social equity research have been largely unmet. A social equity issue that calls for more research concerns the extent to which police are fair in their interactions with minorities, especially African Americans. The literature addressing two of Gooden’s questions, namely “What is the extent of inequity” and “Why does inequity persist”, is growing. However, few studies have examined the third question, or how police agencies achieve accountability for social equity and, in turn, how agencies’ actions affect citizens’ perceptions of how socially equitable departments are. As such, this study asks two questions: 1) what political, managerial, and legal factors affect citizen perceptions of social equity in policing; and 2) how do these factors affect citizen perceptions of social equity in policing? To address these questions, a cross-case comparison of 11 purposively selected U.S. cities (“locales”) was conducted. Local newspapers, city council meeting minutes, legislative agenda, police agencies’ websites, and law enforcement statistics were examined to understand each locale’s history of community-police relations and agency practices related to social equity. Next, 55 semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of citizen groups, state- and v local-level political leaders, and police agency representatives to ascertain how agencies achieve accountability for social equity and how these strategies influence citizens’ perceptions of social equity. Data were iteratively coded, and cross-case analysis was performed using meta-matrices. Findings reveal that several factors affect citizens’ perceptions of social equity, namely the extent to which: a) citizen groups, political leaders, and police agencies cooperate to define social equity outcomes; b) these different groups agree on how best to pursue social equity; c) agencies involve community leaders to obtain buy-in when dealing with criminal and social issues popularly related to race; d) there have been recent shootings of unarmed minorities; e) departments foster more one-on-one engagement with citizens; f) departments employ community policing and social equity performance measurement to shape practice; g) agencies try to achieve racial parity; and h) agencies require trainings on community engagement. As citizens feel that agencies more actively involve community groups and employ the strategies above, perceptions of social equity are more positive. A theory of accountability for social equity emerged. This theory is captured in a systems model, which highlights the environmental, input, black box, output, and feedback factors that appear linked to citizen perceptions of social equity. Three broad conclusions emerge: 1) discourses lead to policing practices and perceptions; 2) “fit” (i.e., openness to and feasibility of social equity programs), chiefs’ reinforcement, and officer buy-in affect how departments try to achieve social equity; and 3) there are at least three approaches to accountability for social equity. After the discussion of this theory, limitations and future studies are discussed.
Publisher
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
Subject
ISBN
9781369757828, 1369757824
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.