Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Hierarchical substrates of prediction in visual cortical spiking
by
Gillis, Ryan
, Bawany, Ahad
, Sennesh, Eli
, Ricci, David
, Belski, Hannah
, Ouellette, Ben
, Westerberg, Jacob A
, Ha, Vivian
, Grasso, Conor
, Groblewski, Peter A
, Young, Ahrial
, Cabasco, Hannah
, Loeffler, Henry
, Xiong, Yihan S
, Koch, Christof
, Caldejon, Shiella
, Olsen, Shawn R
, Kiselycznyk, Carly
, Durand, Séverine
, Johnson, Tye
, Hardcastle, Ben
, Lecoq, Jerome A
, Bastos, André M
, Williford, Ali
, Nejat, Hamed
, Han, Warren
, Maier, Alexander
, Peene, Carter R
, Nguyen, Katrina
, Swapp, Jackie
in
Neuroscience
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Hierarchical substrates of prediction in visual cortical spiking
by
Gillis, Ryan
, Bawany, Ahad
, Sennesh, Eli
, Ricci, David
, Belski, Hannah
, Ouellette, Ben
, Westerberg, Jacob A
, Ha, Vivian
, Grasso, Conor
, Groblewski, Peter A
, Young, Ahrial
, Cabasco, Hannah
, Loeffler, Henry
, Xiong, Yihan S
, Koch, Christof
, Caldejon, Shiella
, Olsen, Shawn R
, Kiselycznyk, Carly
, Durand, Séverine
, Johnson, Tye
, Hardcastle, Ben
, Lecoq, Jerome A
, Bastos, André M
, Williford, Ali
, Nejat, Hamed
, Han, Warren
, Maier, Alexander
, Peene, Carter R
, Nguyen, Katrina
, Swapp, Jackie
in
Neuroscience
2025
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Hierarchical substrates of prediction in visual cortical spiking
by
Gillis, Ryan
, Bawany, Ahad
, Sennesh, Eli
, Ricci, David
, Belski, Hannah
, Ouellette, Ben
, Westerberg, Jacob A
, Ha, Vivian
, Grasso, Conor
, Groblewski, Peter A
, Young, Ahrial
, Cabasco, Hannah
, Loeffler, Henry
, Xiong, Yihan S
, Koch, Christof
, Caldejon, Shiella
, Olsen, Shawn R
, Kiselycznyk, Carly
, Durand, Séverine
, Johnson, Tye
, Hardcastle, Ben
, Lecoq, Jerome A
, Bastos, André M
, Williford, Ali
, Nejat, Hamed
, Han, Warren
, Maier, Alexander
, Peene, Carter R
, Nguyen, Katrina
, Swapp, Jackie
in
Neuroscience
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Hierarchical substrates of prediction in visual cortical spiking
Journal Article
Hierarchical substrates of prediction in visual cortical spiking
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Predictive processing models have recently flourished in neuroscience
. Feedforward and feedback modulation are at the heart of these hierarchical predictive processing models. Previous experimental studies using fMRI, EEG/MEG, and LFP
could not reliably resolve feedback modulation from local computations and feedforward outputs. Here, using open-science
, multi-species, multi-area, high-density
, laminar neurophysiology
, we empirically test whether predictive processing is a key component shaping sensation. To isolate sensory information processing and eliminate motor/reward confounders
, we use a no-report task. Our task leveraged so-called global oddballs (GO) as unpredictable, deviant stimuli that circumvent low-level adaptation. We examined their responses relative to local oddballs (LO) that we habituated into highly predictable priors. Four surprising findings in this dataset challenge many existing predictive processing models. First, passively evoked GO responses were exclusive to higher-order, more cognitive areas rather than early-to-mid sensory cortex. Second, interneuron-targeted optogenetics revealed no evidence for a subtractive mechanism in both primates and mice. Third, highly predictable LO responses dominated in over 50% of all neurons, including in higher-order cortex which should have anticipated them, indicating limited evidence for predictive suppression. Lastly, prediction errors followed a feedback, rather than a feedforward signature. These results reveal circuit dynamics that govern the shaping of sensory processing by prediction, which will motivate new, neurally-constrained predictive processing models.
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.