Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
微创治疗老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折伴骨质疏松症的回顾性研究
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
微创治疗老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折伴骨质疏松症的回顾性研究
Do you wish to request the book?
微创治疗老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折伴骨质疏松症的回顾性研究
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
微创治疗老年不稳定股骨转子间骨折伴骨质疏松症的回顾性研究
2017
Overview
目的 探讨微创内固定治疗老年骨质疏松不稳定股骨转子间骨折的方法及疗效。方法 回顾性分析2009年1月-2015年9月采用Intertan或短重建钉(TAN)内固定微创治疗的112例老年性骨质疏松股骨转子间骨折患者的临床资料。所有患者均结合病史、查体及影像学检查进行诊断,按照AO分型,31-A.1型34例,31-A.2型61例,31-A.3型17例。对手术时间、透视时间、术中失血量、住院天数、并发症及髋关节功能评分等进行统计分析。结果 112例患者中78例获随访,随访时间3~27个月(平均15个月),其中Intertan组41例,TAN组37例。Intertan组手术时间、透视时间(分别为58.9±6.9、2.70±0.47min)明显短于TAN组(分别为75.6±5.9、4.40±0.47min),术中出血量(107.6±6.7ml)明显低于TAN组(127.8±6.8ml),髋关节Harris评分优良率(73%)高于TAN组(65%),术后并发症发生率(4.9%)低于TAN组(10.8%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组住院天数、骨折愈合时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论Intertan和TAN两种微创固定方法治疗不稳定股骨转子间骨折均可取得较好的临床疗效,其中Intertan具有操作简单、固定可靠、出血少、髋关节功能恢复好、并发症少等优点,是治疗老年骨质疏松不稳定股骨转子间骨折的良好选择。
Publisher
People's Military Medical Press,310012,杭州 浙江省立同德医院创伤骨科
