Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
From Anecdotes to Real-Life Examples: A Mixed-Methods Survey on Self-Deception
by
Visu-Petra, Laura
, Moldoveanu, Mara Georgiana
, Otgaar, Henry
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
From Anecdotes to Real-Life Examples: A Mixed-Methods Survey on Self-Deception
by
Visu-Petra, Laura
, Moldoveanu, Mara Georgiana
, Otgaar, Henry
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
From Anecdotes to Real-Life Examples: A Mixed-Methods Survey on Self-Deception
Journal Article
From Anecdotes to Real-Life Examples: A Mixed-Methods Survey on Self-Deception
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Self-deception, a motivated process of maintaining false beliefs despite contrary evidence, is often depicted using anecdotes and philosophical hypotheses, with emerging yet scarce empirical data. This study aimed to examine the prevalence and frequency of self-deception in the general population, gather real-life examples, and explore essential elements and characteristics of self-deception (e.g., intentionality, awareness, motivations, contradictory evidence, strategies used to maintain self-deception). Participants (N= 228 university students, Mage = 21.7, SDage = 2.46, 71.9% women; the total number of respondents varied per question) received a mixed-methods survey with open-ended and multiple-choice questions on experiences of self-deception. Dispositional self-deception was also measured using the Self-Deceptive Enhancement Scale of the Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS; Paulhus, 1998). Findings revealed a high prevalence of self-deception (91.3%, n = 200) with high reported frequency (50.5%, n = 122). Participants reported denying and exaggerating information, due primarily to intrapersonal motivations (e.g., increased well-being and self-confidence). Self-deception was maintained by largely ignoring or avoiding contradictory evidence, and new evidence and social feedback led to its retraction. Notably, while dispositional self-deception was lower in our sample than in normative populations, it was negatively associated with the reported frequency of (situational) self-deception. The study discusses the importance of understanding essential elements and characteristics of self-deception in everyday situations and its relevance for legal settings.
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.