Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Jak dwoje staje się jednym? Pojęcie tożsamości u Pawła Florenskiego
by
Rojek, Paweł
in
FILOZOFIA RELIGII
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Religion
/ Special Branches of Philosophy
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Jak dwoje staje się jednym? Pojęcie tożsamości u Pawła Florenskiego
by
Rojek, Paweł
in
FILOZOFIA RELIGII
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Religion
/ Special Branches of Philosophy
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Jak dwoje staje się jednym? Pojęcie tożsamości u Pawła Florenskiego
Journal Article
Jak dwoje staje się jednym? Pojęcie tożsamości u Pawła Florenskiego
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Pavel Florensky attempted to formulate an ontological theory of love. He believed that love is not merely a psychological phenomenon but also implies a kind of real unification. Florensky proposed to understand the latter in terms of consubstantiality. Two numerically distinct subjects might become one in virtue of their numerically identical essence. Besides that Florensky sketched an ontological theory based on the distinction between things and persons. It seems that he held a bundle theory of objects, a trope nominalism for things, and a substrate theory combined with realism for persons. Florensky’s view might be therefore taken as a position in the debate on the principle of the identity of indiscernibles. Finally, I suggest that the serious philosophical and theological problems of Florensky’s ontology of love might be overcome by adding to his theory the patristic distinction between essence and energies.
Publisher
Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II,The Learned Society of the Catholic University of Lublin John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin,John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Faculty of Philosophy
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.