Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
SHAPING THE SAUDI STATE: HUMAN AGENCY'S SHIFTING ROLE IN RENTIER-STATE FORMATION
by
Hertog, Steffen
in
Politics in the Arabian Peninsula
2007
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
SHAPING THE SAUDI STATE: HUMAN AGENCY'S SHIFTING ROLE IN RENTIER-STATE FORMATION
by
Hertog, Steffen
in
Politics in the Arabian Peninsula
2007
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
SHAPING THE SAUDI STATE: HUMAN AGENCY'S SHIFTING ROLE IN RENTIER-STATE FORMATION
Journal Article
SHAPING THE SAUDI STATE: HUMAN AGENCY'S SHIFTING ROLE IN RENTIER-STATE FORMATION
2007
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The article offers a revisionist account of how the modern Saudi state emerged in the 1950s
and 1960s. Differing with structuralist “rentier-state” accounts, I contend that individual agency
has been very important in shaping the Saudi bureaucracy as oil money gave unique, although
temporary, autonomy to princely elites to organize the state around their personal interests.
Emerging institutions functioned as power tokens, leading to a fragmented administrative setup in
which ministries serve as “fiefdoms” and bureaucratic capacities vary strongly from one institution
to another. Through state growth and the “locking in” of distributional commitments, the autonomy
of princely elites to redesign the state has strongly declined over time, meaning that many early
institutional decisions have permanently impacted the shape and capacities of today's Saudi state.
Vis-agrave;-vis rentier theory, I demonstrate that regime autonomy is not constant over time and that the
quality of institutions is historically contingent and not determined by oil, which merely enlarges
the menu of institutional choices available to rentier-state elites.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.