MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Reliability of quantitative multiparameter maps is high for magnetization transfer and proton density but attenuated for R 1 and R 2 in healthy young adults
Reliability of quantitative multiparameter maps is high for magnetization transfer and proton density but attenuated for R 1 and R 2 in healthy young adults
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Reliability of quantitative multiparameter maps is high for magnetization transfer and proton density but attenuated for R 1 and R 2 in healthy young adults
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Reliability of quantitative multiparameter maps is high for magnetization transfer and proton density but attenuated for R 1 and R 2 in healthy young adults
Reliability of quantitative multiparameter maps is high for magnetization transfer and proton density but attenuated for R 1 and R 2 in healthy young adults

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Reliability of quantitative multiparameter maps is high for magnetization transfer and proton density but attenuated for R 1 and R 2 in healthy young adults
Reliability of quantitative multiparameter maps is high for magnetization transfer and proton density but attenuated for R 1 and R 2 in healthy young adults
Journal Article

Reliability of quantitative multiparameter maps is high for magnetization transfer and proton density but attenuated for R 1 and R 2 in healthy young adults

2022
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
We investigate the reliability of individual differences of four quantities measured by magnetic resonance imaging‐based multiparameter mapping (MPM): magnetization transfer saturation (MT), proton density (PD), longitudinal relaxation rate (R 1 ), and effective transverse relaxation rate (R 2 *). Four MPM datasets, two on each of two consecutive days, were acquired in healthy young adults. On Day 1, no repositioning occurred and on Day 2, participants were repositioned between MPM datasets. Using intraclass correlation effect decomposition (ICED), we assessed the contributions of session‐specific, day‐specific, and residual sources of measurement error. For whole‐brain gray and white matter, all four MPM parameters showed high reproducibility and high reliability, as indexed by the coefficient of variation (CoV) and the intraclass correlation (ICC). However, MT, PD, R 1 , and R 2 * differed markedly in the extent to which reliability varied across brain regions. MT and PD showed high reliability in almost all regions. In contrast, R 1 and R 2 * showed low reliability in some regions outside the basal ganglia, such that the sum of the measurement error estimates in our structural equation model was higher than estimates of between‐person differences. In addition, in this sample of healthy young adults, the four MPM parameters showed very little variability over four measurements but differed in how well they could assess between‐person differences. We conclude that R 1 and R 2 * might carry only limited person‐specific information in some regions of the brain in healthy young adults, and, by implication, might be of restricted utility for studying associations to between‐person differences in behavior in those regions.

MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks