Journal Article

Over‐Representation of Extremely Wealthy Neighborhood Social Exposomes for Brain Donors within Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Brain Banks assessed by the Neighborhoods Study

Lingler, Jennifer H, Chamberlain, Luke, Karikari, Thomas K, Bakulski, Kelly M., Lamar, Melissa, Apostolova, Liana G., Whitmer, Rachel A., Sano, Mary, Neugroschl, Judith A., Marsh, Karyn, Rissman, Robert A, Sharrow, Jessica, Abner, Erin L., DeWitt, Amanda, Lockhart, Samuel N., Powell, W. Ryan, Woltjer, Randall, Risacher, Shannon L., O'Connor, Maureen K., Soldan, Anja, Zhu, Carolyn W., Goldstein, Felicia, Barnes, Lisa L., Perrin, Richard J., Fabio, Anthony, Kofler, Julia, Sultzer, David L, Bendlin, Barbara B., Croff, Raina, Miller, Bruce L., Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski, Morris, Jill K, Serrano, Geidy E, Henderson, Victor W., Mahnken, Jonathan D, Brewer, James B., Pettigrew, Corinne, Boone, Brittney Lyons, Raji, Cyrus A., Pierce, Aimee, Reiman, Eric M., Craft, Suzanne, Lanata, Serggio, Cheng, Yixuan, Kind, Amy J.H., Lepping, Rebecca J, Bennett, David A., Chodosh, Joshua, Alosco, Michael L., Paulson, Henry L, Wisniewski, Thomas, Espinoza, Patricia Rodriguez, Saykin, Andrew J., Meyer, Oanh L., Carrion, Carmen, Kucharska‐Newton, Anna M., Bateman, James R., Beach, Thomas G.

2024

Overview

Background Adverse social exposome (indexed by national Area Deprivation Index [ADI] 80‐100 or ‘high ADI’) is linked to structural inequities and increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Twenty percent of the US population resides within high ADI areas, predominantly in inner cities, tribal reservations and rural areas. The percentage of brain donors from high ADI areas within the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) brain bank system is unknown. Objective Determine ADI for brain donors from 21 ADRC sites as part of the on‐going Neighborhoods Study. Methods All brain donors in participating ADRC sites with NACC neuropathology data and personal identifiers for ADI linkage (N = 8,637) were included (Figure 1). Geocoded donor addresses were linked to time‐concordant ADI percentiles for year of death. Results Overall, only 5.6% of ADRC brain donors (N = 488) resided in a high ADI (disadvantaged) neighborhood at death. The remaining donors resided in more advantaged neighborhoods, with nearly 40% of donors living in the wealthiest quintile of neighborhoods, and over 300 brain donors originating from the wealthiest 1% of US neighborhoods (Figure 2). Donors from high ADI (disadvantaged) neighborhoods identified as 87% White (n = 424), 11% Black (55), 1% Multiracial (6) and <1% other/unknown race (3), with 1% Hispanic (5). None identified as American Indian/Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander/Asian. In comparison, donors from low ADI neighborhoods were 94% White (n = 7680), 3% Black (273), 1% Multiracial (75), <1% American Indian/Alaska Native (11), <1% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander/Asian (60), and <1% other/unknown race (50), with 3% Hispanic (230). Sex distribution was similar (54%, 51% female, respectively). Inclusion of high ADI donors varied dramatically across the 21 ADRC brain banks from a low of 0.6% to high of 20% of all a site’s donors (Figure 3). Conclusions ADI was determined for over 8,600 brain donors in the ADRC system, demonstrating a marked over‐representation of donors from very low ADI (extremely wealthy) neighborhoods, in addition to site‐to‐site variability. This is the first time a comprehensive cross‐sectional social exposome assessment of this nature has been performed, opening windows for additional mechanistic study of the social exposome on brain pathology. Life course ADI assessments are on‐going.

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subject: Public Health