Journal Article

Notes from the Editors

2012

Overview

We have readily assumed that, within Muslim countries, fundamentalists will most oppose American influence and policies, but Lisa Blaydes and Drew A. Linzer find a striking and perhaps surprising regularity: Anti-Americanism is most pronounced in the least observant Islamic countries. Moreover, opposition to the United States does not seem to be related to any particular American policies or to American culture generally. Anti-Americanism arises instead, they argue in “Elite Competition, Religiosity, and Anti-Americanism in the Islamic World,” from elite strategy, in which fundamentalist political factions fan anti-American sentiments to compete with more secular groups. That competition is most intense, and hence the anti-American strategy most frequently employed, in Islamic countries in which divisions between secular and religious forces are most pronounced. Employing a mix of statistical and case study methods, Blaydes and Linzer find that, within countries, observant Muslims are likelier to express anti-American sentiments; between countries, competition between secular and religious forces, and not fundamentalism, inspires anti-U.S. sentiment.

• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Subject: Administrative Organization / Anti-Americanism / Authoritarianism / Bureaucracy / Bureaucrats / Case studies / Christianity / Competition / Congressional elections / Democracy / Dictators / Elementary Education / Elites / Ethnicity / Government (Administrative Body) / Islam / Islamic countries / Muslims / Political leadership / Political science / Politics / Presidential elections / Presidents / Protestantism / Religiosity / Secularism / Social Organizations / Voters